- 28 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Bottomley 提交于
In order to use the new execute_in_process_context() API, you have to provide it with the work storage, which I do in SCSI in scsi_device and scsi_target, but which also means that we can no longer queue up the target reaps, so instead I moved the target to a state model which allows target_alloc to detect if we've received a dying target and wait for it to be gone. Hopefully, this should also solve the target namespace race. Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Bottomley 提交于
We have several points in the SCSI stack (primarily for our device functions) where we need to guarantee process context, but (given the place where the last reference was released) we cannot guarantee this. This API gets around the issue by executing the function directly if the caller has process context, but scheduling a workqueue to execute in process context if the caller doesn't have it. Unfortunately, it requires memory allocation in interrupt context, but it's better than what we have previously. The true solution will require a bit of re-engineering, so isn't appropriate for 2.6.16. Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
When James Smart fixed the issue of the userspace scan atributes crashing the system with the FC transport class he added a patch to let the transport class check if the parent is valid for a given transport class. When adding support for the integrated raid of fusion sas devices we ran into a problem with that, as it didn't allow adding virtual raid volumes without the transport class knowing about it. So this patch adds a user_scan attribute instead, that takes over from scsi_scan_host_selected if the transport class sets it and thus lets the transport class control the user-initiated scanning. As this plugs the hole about user-initiated scanning the target_parent hook goes away and we rely on callers of the scanning routines to do something sensible. For SAS this meant I had to switch from a spinlock to a mutex to synchronize the topology linked lists, in FC they were completely unsynchronized which seems wrong. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Bottomley 提交于
Here's a tiny update that means we print the correct ASCII type information Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
a) TYPE_SDAD renamed to TYPE_RBC and taken to scsi.h b) in sbp2.c remapping of TYPE_RPB to TYPE_DISK turned off c) relevant places in midlayer and sd.c taught to accept TYPE_RBC d) sd.c::sd_read_cache_type() looks into page 6 when dealing with TYPE_RBC - these guys have writeback cache flag there and are not guaranteed to have page 8 at all. e) sd_read_cache_type() got an extra sanity check - it checks that it got the page it asked for before using its contents. And screams if mismatch had happened. Rationale: there are broken devices out there that are "helpful" enough to go for "I don't have a page you've asked for, here, have another one". For example, PL3507 had been caught doing just that... f) sbp2 sets sdev->use_10_for_rw and sdev->use_10_for_ms instead of bothering to remap READ6/WRITE6/MOD_SENSE, so most of the conversions in there are gone now. Incidentally, I wonder if USB storage devices that have no mode page 8 are simply RBC ones. I haven't touched that, but it might be interesting to check... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gerd Knorr 提交于
This patch adds a device driver for scsi media changer devices. Signed-off-by: NGerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Garzik 提交于
Authors: Brett Russ <russb@emc.com> John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Andy Warner <andyw@pobox.com>
-
- 19 4月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
We have a DID_IMM_RETRY to require a retry at once, but we could do with a DID_REQUEUE to instruct the mid-layer to treat this command in the same manner as QUEUE_FULL or BUSY (i.e. halt the submission until another command returns ... or the queue pressure builds if there are no outstanding commands). Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
Adapted from a patch in SuSE's kernel SRPM. Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
We have a DID_IMM_RETRY to require a retry at once, but we could do with a DID_REQUEUE to instruct the mid-layer to treat this command in the same manner as QUEUE_FULL or BUSY (i.e. halt the submission until another command returns ... or the queue pressure builds if there are no outstanding commands). Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
Adapted from a patch in SuSE's kernel SRPM. Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-