- 28 12月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
fix off by one error in max call depth check and add a test Fixes: f4d7e40a ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Instead of computing max stack depth for current call chain during the main verifier pass track stack depth of each function independently and after do_check() is done do another pass over all instructions analyzing depth of all possible call stacks. Fixes: f4d7e40a ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 24 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gianluca Borello 提交于
Commit cc2b14d5 ("bpf: teach verifier to recognize zero initialized stack") introduced a very relaxed check when comparing stacks of different states, effectively returning a positive result in many cases where it shouldn't. This can create problems in cases such as this following C pseudocode: long var; long *x = bpf_map_lookup(...); if (!x) return; if (*x != 0xbeef) var = 0; else var = 1; /* This is the key part, calling a helper causes an explored state * to be saved with the information that "var" is on the stack as * STACK_ZERO, since the helper is first met by the verifier after * the "var = 0" assignment. This state will however be wrongly used * also for the "var = 1" case, so the verifier assumes "var" is always * 0 and will replace the NULL assignment with nops, because the * search pruning prevents it from exploring the faulty branch. */ bpf_ktime_get_ns(); if (var) *(long *)0 = 0xbeef; Fix the issue by making sure that the stack is fully explored before returning a positive comparison result. Also attach a couple tests that highlight the bad behavior. In the first test, without this fix instructions 16 and 17 are replaced with nops instead of being rejected by the verifier. The second test, instead, allows a program to make a potentially illegal read from the stack. Fixes: cc2b14d5 ("bpf: teach verifier to recognize zero initialized stack") Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 21 12月, 2017 11 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Currently a dump of an xlated prog (post verifier stage) doesn't correlate used helpers as well as maps. The prog info lists involved map ids, however there's no correlation of where in the program they are used as of today. Likewise, bpftool does not correlate helper calls with the target functions. The latter can be done w/o any kernel changes through kallsyms, and also has the advantage that this works with inlined helpers and BPF calls. Example, via interpreter: # tc filter show dev foo ingress filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 handle 0x1 foo.o:[ingress] \ direct-action not_in_hw id 1 tag c74773051b364165 <-- prog id:1 * Output before patch (calls/maps remain unclear): # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 <-- dump prog id:1 0: (b7) r1 = 2 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1 2: (bf) r2 = r10 3: (07) r2 += -4 4: (18) r1 = 0xffff95c47a8d4800 6: (85) call unknown#73040 7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+18 8: (bf) r2 = r10 9: (07) r2 += -4 10: (bf) r1 = r0 11: (85) call unknown#73040 12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23 [...] * Output after patch: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 0: (b7) r1 = 2 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1 2: (bf) r2 = r10 3: (07) r2 += -4 4: (18) r1 = map[id:2] <-- map id:2 6: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#73424 <-- helper call 7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+18 8: (bf) r2 = r10 9: (07) r2 += -4 10: (bf) r1 = r0 11: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#73424 12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+23 [...] # bpftool map show id 2 <-- show/dump/etc map id:2 2: hash_of_maps flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 3 memlock 4096B Example, JITed, same prog: # tc filter show dev foo ingress filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 filter protocol all pref 49152 bpf chain 0 handle 0x1 foo.o:[ingress] \ direct-action not_in_hw id 3 tag c74773051b364165 jited # bpftool prog show id 3 3: sched_cls tag c74773051b364165 loaded_at Dec 19/13:48 uid 0 xlated 384B jited 257B memlock 4096B map_ids 2 # bpftool prog dump xlated id 3 0: (b7) r1 = 2 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1 2: (bf) r2 = r10 3: (07) r2 += -4 4: (18) r1 = map[id:2] <-- map id:2 6: (85) call __htab_map_lookup_elem#77408 <-+ inlined rewrite 7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 | 8: (07) r0 += 56 | 9: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) <-+ 10: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+24 11: (bf) r2 = r10 12: (07) r2 += -4 [...] Example, same prog, but kallsyms disabled (in that case we are also not allowed to pass any relative offsets, etc, so prog becomes pointer sanitized on dump): # sysctl kernel.kptr_restrict=2 kernel.kptr_restrict = 2 # bpftool prog dump xlated id 3 0: (b7) r1 = 2 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1 2: (bf) r2 = r10 3: (07) r2 += -4 4: (18) r1 = map[id:2] 6: (85) call bpf_unspec#0 7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 [...] Example, BPF calls via interpreter: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 0: (85) call pc+2#__bpf_prog_run_args32 1: (b7) r0 = 1 2: (95) exit 3: (b7) r0 = 2 4: (95) exit Example, BPF calls via JIT: # sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable=1 net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1 # sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms=1 net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms = 1 # bpftool prog dump xlated id 1 0: (85) call pc+2#bpf_prog_3b185187f1855c4c_F 1: (b7) r0 = 1 2: (95) exit 3: (b7) r0 = 2 4: (95) exit And finally, an example for tail calls that is now working as well wrt correlation: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 2 [...] 10: (b7) r2 = 8 11: (85) call bpf_trace_printk#-41312 12: (bf) r1 = r6 13: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 15: (b7) r3 = 0 16: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 17: (b7) r1 = 42 18: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +46) = r1 19: (b7) r0 = 0 20: (95) exit # bpftool map show id 1 1: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 1 memlock 4096B Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> -
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Right now kallsyms handling is not working with JITed subprogs. The reason is that when in 1c2a088a ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs") in jit_subprogs() they are passed to bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(), then their prog type is 0, which BPF core will think it's a cBPF program as only cBPF programs have a 0 type. Thus, they need to inherit the type from the main prog. Once that is fixed, they are indeed added to the BPF kallsyms infra, but their tag is 0. Therefore, since intention is to add them as bpf_prog_F_<tag>, we need to pass them to bpf_prog_calc_tag() first. And once this is resolved, there is a use-after-free on prog cleanup: we remove the kallsyms entry from the main prog, later walk all subprogs and call bpf_jit_free() on them. However, the kallsyms linkage was never released on them. Thus, do that for all subprogs right in __bpf_prog_put() when refcount hits 0. Fixes: 1c2a088a ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Do not allow root to convert valid pointers into unknown scalars. In particular disallow: ptr &= reg ptr <<= reg ptr += ptr and explicitly allow: ptr -= ptr since pkt_end - pkt == length 1. This minimizes amount of address leaks root can do. In the future may need to further tighten the leaks with kptr_restrict. 2. If program has such pointer math it's likely a user mistake and when verifier complains about it right away instead of many instructions later on invalid memory access it's easier for users to fix their progs. 3. when register holding a pointer cannot change to scalar it allows JITs to optimize better. Like 32-bit archs could use single register for pointers instead of a pair required to hold 64-bit scalars. 4. reduces architecture dependent behavior. Since code: r1 = r10; r1 &= 0xff; if (r1 ...) will behave differently arm64 vs x64 and offloaded vs native. A significant chunk of ptr mangling was allowed by commit f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") yet some of it was allowed even earlier. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
There were various issues related to the limited size of integers used in the verifier: - `off + size` overflow in __check_map_access() - `off + reg->off` overflow in check_mem_access() - `off + reg->var_off.value` overflow or 32-bit truncation of `reg->var_off.value` in check_mem_access() - 32-bit truncation in check_stack_boundary() Make sure that any integer math cannot overflow by not allowing pointer math with large values. Also reduce the scope of "scalar op scalar" tracking. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
This could be made safe by passing through a reference to env and checking for env->allow_ptr_leaks, but it would only work one way and is probably not worth the hassle - not doing it will not directly lead to program rejection. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
Force strict alignment checks for stack pointers because the tracking of stack spills relies on it; unaligned stack accesses can lead to corruption of spilled registers, which is exploitable. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
Prevent indirect stack accesses at non-constant addresses, which would permit reading and corrupting spilled pointers. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
32-bit ALU ops operate on 32-bit values and have 32-bit outputs. Adjust the verifier accordingly. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
Properly handle register truncation to a smaller size. The old code first mirrors the clearing of the high 32 bits in the bitwise tristate representation, which is correct. But then, it computes the new arithmetic bounds as the intersection between the old arithmetic bounds and the bounds resulting from the bitwise tristate representation. Therefore, when coerce_reg_to_32() is called on a number with bounds [0xffff'fff8, 0x1'0000'0007], the verifier computes [0xffff'fff8, 0xffff'ffff] as bounds of the truncated number. This is incorrect: The truncated number could also be in the range [0, 7], and no meaningful arithmetic bounds can be computed in that case apart from the obvious [0, 0xffff'ffff]. Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set. Debian assigned CVE-2017-16996 for this issue. v2: - flip the mask during arithmetic bounds calculation (Ben Hutchings) v3: - add CVE number (Ben Hutchings) Fixes: b03c9f9f ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
Distinguish between BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit) and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit); only perform sign extension in the first case. Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set. Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue. v3: - add CVE number (Ben Hutchings) Fixes: 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Edward Cree 提交于
Incorrect signed bounds were being computed. If the old upper signed bound was positive and the old lower signed bound was negative, this could cause the new upper signed bound to be too low, leading to security issues. Fixes: b03c9f9f ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values") Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [jannh@google.com: changed description to reflect bug impact] Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 19 12月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Yonghong Song 提交于
The tools/testing/selftests/bpf test program test_dev_cgroup fails with the following error when compiled with llvm 6.0. (I did not try with earlier versions.) libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG --- libbpf: 0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +4) 1: (b7) r0 = 0 2: (55) if r2 != 0x1 goto pc+8 R0=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv1 R10=fp0 3: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0) invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=2 ... The culprit is the following statement in dev_cgroup.c: short type = ctx->access_type & 0xFFFF; This code is typical as the ctx->access_type is assigned as below in kernel/bpf/cgroup.c: struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx ctx = { .access_type = (access << 16) | dev_type, .major = major, .minor = minor, }; The compiler converts it to u16 access while the verifier cgroup_dev_is_valid_access rejects any non u32 access. This patch permits the field access_type to be accessible with type u16 and u8 as well. Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Tested-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> -
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Function skip_callee is local to the source and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static. Also return NULL rather than 0. Cleans up two sparse warnings: symbol 'skip_callee' was not declared. Should it be static? Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in error message text. Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 18 12月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs, blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid this race condition. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
though bpf_call is still the same call instruction and calling convention 'bpf to bpf' and 'bpf to helper' is the same the interpreter has to oparate on 'struct bpf_insn *'. To distinguish these two cases add a kernel internal opcode and mark call insns with it. This opcode is seen by interpreter only. JITs will never see it. Also add tiny bit of debug code to aid interpreter debugging. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
programs with function calls are often passing various pointers via stack. When all calls are inlined llvm flattens stack accesses and optimizes away extra branches. When functions are not inlined it becomes the job of the verifier to recognize zero initialized stack to avoid exploring paths that program will not take. The following program would fail otherwise: ptr = &buffer_on_stack; *ptr = 0; ... func_call(.., ptr, ...) { if (..) *ptr = bpf_map_lookup(); } ... if (*ptr != 0) { // Access (*ptr)->field is valid. // Without stack_zero tracking such (*ptr)->field access // will be rejected } since stack slots are no longer uniform invalid | spill | misc add liveness marking to all slots, but do it in 8 byte chunks. So if nothing was read or written in [fp-16, fp-9] range it will be marked as LIVE_NONE. If any byte in that range was read, it will be marked LIVE_READ and stacksafe() check will perform byte-by-byte verification. If all bytes in the range were written the slot will be marked as LIVE_WRITTEN. This significantly speeds up state equality comparison and reduces total number of states processed. before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2051 2003 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3287 3164 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1080 1080 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 24980 12361 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 34308 16605 bpf_netdev.o 15404 10962 bpf_overlay.o 7191 6679 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> -
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function. To recognize such set of bpf functions the verifier does: 1. runs control flow analysis to detect function boundaries 2. proceeds with verification of all functions starting from main(root) function It recognizes that the stack of the caller can be accessed by the callee (if the caller passed a pointer to its stack to the callee) and the callee can store map_value and other pointers into the stack of the caller. 3. keeps track of the stack_depth of each function to make sure that total stack depth is still less than 512 bytes 4. disallows pointers to the callee stack to be stored into the caller stack, since they will be invalid as soon as the callee returns 5. to reuse all of the existing state_pruning logic each function call is considered to be independent call from the verifier point of view. The verifier pretends to inline all function calls it sees are being called. It stores the callsite instruction index as part of the state to make sure that two calls to the same callee from two different places in the caller will be different from state pruning point of view 6. more safety checks are added to liveness analysis Implementation details: . struct bpf_verifier_state is now consists of all stack frames that led to this function . struct bpf_func_state represent one stack frame. It consists of registers in the given frame and its stack . propagate_liveness() logic had a premature optimization where mark_reg_read() and mark_stack_slot_read() were manually inlined with loop iterating over parents for each register or stack slot. Undo this optimization to reuse more complex mark_*_read() logic . skip_callee() logic is not necessary from safety point of view, but without it mark_*_read() markings become too conservative, since after returning from the funciton call a read of r6-r9 will incorrectly propagate the read marks into callee causing inefficient pruning later . mark_*_read() logic is now aware of control flow which makes it more complex. In the future the plan is to rewrite liveness to be hierarchical. So that liveness can be done within basic block only and control flow will be responsible for propagation of liveness information along cfg and between calls. . tail_calls and ld_abs insns are not allowed in the programs with bpf-to-bpf calls . returning stack pointers to the caller or storing them into stack frame of the caller is not allowed Testing: . no difference in cilium processed_insn numbers . large number of tests follows in next patches Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function. Since the beginning of bpf all bpf programs were represented as a single function and program authors were forced to use always_inline for all functions in their C code. That was causing llvm to unnecessary inflate the code size and forcing developers to move code to header files with little code reuse. With a bit of additional complexity teach verifier to recognize arbitrary function calls from one bpf function to another as long as all of functions are presented to the verifier as a single bpf program. New program layout: r6 = r1 // some code .. r1 = .. // arg1 r2 = .. // arg2 call pc+1 // function call pc-relative exit .. = r1 // access arg1 .. = r2 // access arg2 .. call pc+20 // second level of function call ... It allows for better optimized code and finally allows to introduce the core bpf libraries that can be reused in different projects, since programs are no longer limited by single elf file. With function calls bpf can be compiled into multiple .o files. This patch is the first step. It detects programs that contain multiple functions and checks that calls between them are valid. It splits the sequence of bpf instructions (one program) into a set of bpf functions that call each other. Calls to only known functions are allowed. In the future the verifier may allow calls to unresolved functions and will do dynamic linking. This logic supports statically linked bpf functions only. Such function boundary detection could have been done as part of control flow graph building in check_cfg(), but it's cleaner to separate function boundary detection vs control flow checks within a subprogram (function) into logically indepedent steps. Follow up patches may split check_cfg() further, but not check_subprogs(). Only allow bpf-to-bpf calls for root only and for non-hw-offloaded programs. These restrictions can be relaxed in the future. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 16 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Some JITs don't cache skb context on stack in prologue, so when LD_ABS/IND is used and helper calls yield bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() as true, then they temporarily save/restore skb pointer. However, the assumption that skb always has to be in r1 is a bit of a gamble. Right now it turned out to be true for all helpers listed in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(), but lets enforce that from verifier side, so that we make this a guarantee and bail out if the func proto is misconfigured in future helpers. In case of BPF helper calls from cBPF, bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() is completely unrelevant here (since cBPF is context read-only) and therefore always false. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 13 12月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
While using large percpu maps, htab_map_alloc() can hold cpu for hundreds of ms. This patch adds cond_resched() calls to percpu alloc/free call sites, all running in process context. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Error injection is sloppy and very ad-hoc. BPF could fill this niche perfectly with it's kprobe functionality. We could make sure errors are only triggered in specific call chains that we care about with very specific situations. Accomplish this with the bpf_override_funciton helper. This will modify the probe'd callers return value to the specified value and set the PC to an override function that simply returns, bypassing the originally probed function. This gives us a nice clean way to implement systematic error injection for all of our code paths. Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 Yonghong Song 提交于
Commit e87c6bc3 ("bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments for a single perf event") added support to attach multiple bpf programs to a single perf event. Although this provides flexibility, users may want to know what other bpf programs attached to the same tp interface. Besides getting visibility for the underlying bpf system, such information may also help consolidate multiple bpf programs, understand potential performance issues due to a large array, and debug (e.g., one bpf program which overwrites return code may impact subsequent program results). Commit 2541517c ("tracing, perf: Implement BPF programs attached to kprobes") utilized the existing perf ioctl interface and added the command PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF to attach a bpf program to a tracepoint. This patch adds a new ioctl command, given a perf event fd, to query the bpf program array attached to the same perf tracepoint event. The new uapi ioctl command: PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF The new uapi/linux/perf_event.h structure: struct perf_event_query_bpf { __u32 ids_len; __u32 prog_cnt; __u32 ids[0]; }; User space provides buffer "ids" for kernel to copy to. When returning from the kernel, the number of available programs in the array is set in "prog_cnt". The usage: struct perf_event_query_bpf *query = malloc(sizeof(*query) + sizeof(u32) * ids_len); query.ids_len = ids_len; err = ioctl(pmu_efd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF, query); if (err == 0) { /* query.prog_cnt is the number of available progs, * number of progs in ids: (ids_len == 0) ? 0 : query.prog_cnt */ } else if (errno == ENOSPC) { /* query.ids_len number of progs copied, * query.prog_cnt is the number of available progs */ } else { /* other errors */ } Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 01 12月, 2017 7 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
don't pass large struct bpf_reg_state by value. Instead pass it by pointer. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
verifier knows how to trim paths that are known not to be taken at run-time when register containing run-time constant is compared with another constant. It was done only for JEQ comparison. Extend it to include JNE as well. More cases can be added in the future. before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2270 2051 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3682 3287 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1110 1080 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 27876 24980 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 38780 34308 bpf_netdev.o 16937 15404 bpf_overlay.o 7929 7191 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> -
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
registers with pointers filled from stack were missing live_written marks which caused liveness propagation to unnecessary mark more registers as live_read and miss state pruning opportunities later on. before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2285 2270 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3723 3682 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1110 1110 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 27954 27876 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 38954 38780 bpf_netdev.o 16943 16937 bpf_overlay.o 7929 7929 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> -
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
when verifier hits an internal bug don't mark register R10==FP as uninit, since it's read only register and it's not technically correct to let verifier run further, since it may assume that R10 has valid auxiliary state. While developing subsequent patches this issue was discovered, though the code eventually changed that aux reg state doesn't have pointers any more it is still safer to avoid clearing readonly register. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
let verifier print register and stack liveness information into verifier log Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
fix incorrect stack state prints in print_verifier_state() Fixes: 638f5b90 ("bpf: reduce verifier memory consumption") Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Yonghong Song 提交于
cgropu+bpf prog array has a maximum number of 64 programs. Let us apply the same limit here. Fixes: e87c6bc3 ("bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments for a single perf event") Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 28 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
I forgot to add a license on kernel/bpf/offload.c. Luckily I'm still the only author so make it explicitly GPLv2. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NSimon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 23 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
when the verifier detects that register contains a runtime constant and it's compared with another constant it will prune exploration of the branch that is guaranteed not to be taken at runtime. This is all correct, but malicious program may be constructed in such a way that it always has a constant comparison and the other branch is never taken under any conditions. In this case such path through the program will not be explored by the verifier. It won't be taken at run-time either, but since all instructions are JITed the malicious program may cause JITs to complain about using reserved fields, etc. To fix the issue we have to track the instructions explored by the verifier and sanitize instructions that are dead at run time with NOPs. We cannot reject such dead code, since llvm generates it for valid C code, since it doesn't do as much data flow analysis as the verifier does. Fixes: 17a52670 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Gianluca Borello 提交于
With the current ARG_PTR_TO_MEM/ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM semantics, an helper argument can be NULL when the next argument type is ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO and the verifier can prove the value of this next argument is 0. However, most helpers are just interested in handling <!NULL, 0>, so forcing them to deal with <NULL, 0> makes the implementation of those helpers more complicated for no apparent benefits, requiring them to explicitly handle those corner cases with checks that bpf programs could start relying upon, preventing the possibility of removing them later. Solve this by making ARG_PTR_TO_MEM/ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM never accept NULL even when ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO is set, and introduce a new argument type ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to explicitly deal with the NULL case. Currently, the only helper that needs this is bpf_csum_diff_proto(), so change arg1 and arg3 to this new type as well. Also add a new battery of tests that explicitly test the !ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL combination: all the current ones testing the various <NULL, 0> variations are focused on bpf_csum_diff, so cover also other helpers. Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 21 11月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
This reverts commit bd601b6a ("bpf: report offload info to user space"). The ifindex by itself is not sufficient, we should provide information on which network namespace this ifindex belongs to. After considering some options we concluded that it's best to just remove this API for now, and rework it in -next. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
We are currently destroying the device offload state when device moves to another net namespace. This doesn't break with current NFP code, because offload state is not used on program removal, but it's not correct behaviour. Ignore the device unregister notifications on namespace move. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
bpf_prog_get_type() is identical to bpf_prog_get_type_dev(), with false passed as attach_drv. Instead of keeping it as an exported symbol turn it into static inline wrapper. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-