- 13 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 13 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Lutomirski 提交于
If an attacker can cause a controlled kernel stack overflow, overwriting the restart block is a very juicy exploit target. This is because the restart_block is held in the same memory allocation as the kernel stack. Moving the restart block to struct task_struct prevents this exploit by making the restart_block harder to locate. Note that there are other fields in thread_info that are also easy targets, at least on some architectures. It's also a decent simplification, since the restart code is more or less identical on all architectures. [james.hogan@imgtec.com: metag: align thread_info::supervisor_stack] Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NJames Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Use sigsp() instead of the open coded variant. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 09 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Use the more generic functions get_signal() signal_setup_done() for signal delivery. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
由 Jonas Bonn 提交于
The mainline signal handling code for OpenRISC has been buggy since day one with respect to syscall restart. This patch significantly reworks the signal handling code: i) Move the "work pending" loop to C code (borrowed from ARM arch) ii) Allow a tracer to muck about with the IP and skip syscall restart in that case (again, borrowed from ARM) iii) Make signal handling WRT syscall restart actually work v) Make the signal handling code look more like that of other architectures so that it's easier for others to follow Reported-by: NAnders Nystrom <anders@southpole.se> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
- 04 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 29 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
do_sigaltstack() expects _userland_ address, TYVM... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 02 6月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Does block_sigmask() + tracehook_signal_handler(); called when sigframe has been successfully built. All architectures converted to it; block_sigmask() itself is gone now (merged into this one). I'm still not too happy with the signature, but that's a separate story (IMO we need a structure that would contain signal number + siginfo + k_sigaction, so that get_signal_to_deliver() would fill one, signal_delivered(), handle_signal() and probably setup...frame() - take one). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
Only 3 out of 63 do not. Renamed the current variant to __set_current_blocked(), added set_current_blocked() that will exclude unblockable signals, switched open-coded instances to it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
... not if sigframe couldn't have been built. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
replace boilerplate "should we use ->saved_sigmask or ->blocked?" with calls of obvious inlined helper... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
first fruits of ..._restore_sigmask() helpers: now we can take boilerplate "signal didn't have a handler, clear RESTORE_SIGMASK and restore the blocked mask from ->saved_mask" into a common helper. Open-coded instances switched... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonas Bonn 提交于
The pt_regs struct had both a 'syscallno' field and an 'orig_gpr11' field and it wasn't really clear how these were supposed to be used. This patch removes the syscallno field altogether and makes orig_gpr11 work more like other architectures: keep track of syscall number in progress or hold -1 for non-syscall exceptions. Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
- 17 2月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is pending in the shared queue. Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0 ("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from happening again. Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
setup_rt_frame() needs to return an indication of whether it succeeded or failed in setting up the signal stack frame. If setup_rt_frame() fails then we must not modify current->blocked. Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if SA_ONESHOT is set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again in handle_signal(). Furthermore, because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy of sighand->action[]) instead of sighand->action[] the original code actually had no effect on signal delivery. Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it. This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to modify sighand->action[] directly. As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal delivery. Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
-
- 05 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonas Bonn 提交于
As it was decided not to export struct pt_regs to userspace, struct sigcontext shouldn't be using it either. The pt_regs struct for OpenRISC is kernel internal and the layout of the registers may change in the future. The struct user_regs_struct is what is guaranteed to remain stable, so struct sigcontext may use that instead. This patch removes the usage of struct pt_regs in struct sigcontext and makes according changes in signal.c to get the register layout right. The usp field is removed from the sigcontext structure as this information is already contained in the user_regs_struct. Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Reviewed-by: NEmilio Cota <cota@braap.org>
-
- 23 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonas Bonn 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-