- 21 7月, 2012 9 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Add a big comment explaining how the field works, and use defines instead of magic constants for the values assigned to it. Suggested by Joe Perches. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
In order to allow prefixed routes, we have to adjust how rt_gateway is set and interpreted. The new interpretation is: 1) rt_gateway == 0, destination is on-link, nexthop is iph->daddr 2) rt_gateway != 0, destination requires a nexthop gateway Abstract the fetching of the proper nexthop value using a new inline helper, rt_nexthop(), as suggested by Joe Perches. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: NVijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
They are always used in contexts where they can be reconstituted, or where the finally resolved rt->rt_{src,dst} is semantically equivalent. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
The "noref" argument to ip_route_input_common() is now always ignored because we do not cache routes, and in that case we must always grab a reference to the resulting 'dst'. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
The ipv4 routing cache is non-deterministic, performance wise, and is subject to reasonably easy to launch denial of service attacks. The routing cache works great for well behaved traffic, and the world was a much friendlier place when the tradeoffs that led to the routing cache's design were considered. What it boils down to is that the performance of the routing cache is a product of the traffic patterns seen by a system rather than being a product of the contents of the routing tables. The former of which is controllable by external entitites. Even for "well behaved" legitimate traffic, high volume sites can see hit rates in the routing cache of only ~%10. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Julian Anastasov 提交于
Override the metrics with rt_pmtu Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Julian Anastasov 提交于
Fix again the diff value in rt_bind_exception after collision of two latest patches, my original commit actually fixed the same problem. Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Julian Anastasov 提交于
Use global seqlock for the nh_exceptions. Call fnhe_oldest with the right hash chain. Correct the diff value for dst_set_expires. v2: after suggestions from Eric Dumazet: * get rid of spin lock fnhe_lock, rearrange update_or_create_fnhe * continue daddr search in rt_bind_exception v3: * remove the daddr check before seqlock in rt_bind_exception * restart lookup in rt_bind_exception on detected seqlock change, as suggested by David Miller Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
free_nh_exceptions() should use rcu_dereference_protected(..., 1) since its called after one RCU grace period. Also add some const-ification in recent code. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Need to mask it with (FNHE_HASH_SIZE - 1). Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
In a regime where we have subnetted route entries, we need a way to store persistent storage about destination specific learned values such as redirects and PMTU values. This is implemented here via nexthop exceptions. The initial implementation is a 2048 entry hash table with relaiming starting at chain length 5. A more sophisticated scheme can be devised if that proves necessary. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This will be used so that we can compose a full flow key. Even though we have a route in this context, we need more. In the future the routes will be without destination address, source address, etc. keying. One ipv4 route will cover entire subnets, etc. In this environment we have to have a way to possess persistent storage for redirects and PMTU information. This persistent storage will exist in the FIB tables, and that's why we'll need to be able to rebuild a full lookup flow key here. Using that flow key will do a fib_lookup() and create/update the persistent entry. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
We only use it to fetch the rule's tclassid, so just store the tclassid there instead. This also decreases the size of fib_result by a full 8 bytes on 64-bit. On 32-bits it's a wash. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 7月, 2012 7 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
No longer needed, as the protocol handlers now all properly propagate the redirect back into the routing code. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
All of the redirect acceptance policy is now contained within. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Pass in the SKB rather than just the IP addresses, so that policy and other aspects can reside in ip_rt_redirect() rather then icmp_redirect(). Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 7月, 2012 10 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
No longer used. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Nothing every writes to ipv4 metrics any longer. PMTU is stored in rt->rt_pmtu. Dynamic TCP metrics are stored in a special TCP metrics cache, completely outside of the routes. Therefore ->cow_metrics() can simply nothing more than a WARN_ON trigger so we can catch anyone who tries to add new writes to ipv4 route metrics. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Blackhole routes have a COW metrics operation that returns NULL always, therefore this dst_copy_metrics() call did absolutely nothing. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Rather than at every struct rtable creation. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Maintaining this in the inetpeer entries was not the right way to do this at all. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Nobody provides non-zero values any longer. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
No longer needed. TCP writes metrics, but now in it's own special cache that does not dirty the route metrics. Therefore there is no longer any reason to pre-cow metrics in this way. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Only use it in the absolutely required cases: 1) COW'ing metrics 2) ipv4 PMTU 3) ipv4 redirects Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
With help from Lin Ming. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
We don't maintain it dynamically any longer, so reporting it would be extremely misleading. Report zero instead. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 7月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Nobody reads it any longer. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Causes the handler to use the daddr in the ipv4/ipv6 header when the route gateway is unspecified (local subnet). Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Soon routes will not have a cached neigh attached, nor will we be able to necessarily go directly to a neigh from an arbitrary route. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Do not use the dst cached neigh, we'll be getting rid of that. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
We already set it several lines above. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Checking for in_dev being NULL is pointless. In fact, all of our callers have in_dev precomputed already, so just pass it in and remove the NULL checking. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-