Moving plat/omap-secure.h locally to mach-omap2/
as part of single zImage work
Signed-off-by: NLokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

memblock_steal tries to reserve physical memory during boot.
When the requested size is not aligned on the section size
then, the remaining memory available for lowmem becomes
unaligned on the section boundary. There is a issue with this,
which is discussed in the thread below.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/28/112

The final conclusion from the thread seems to
be align the memblock_steal calls on the SECTION boundary.
The issue comes out when LPAE is enabled, where the
section size is 2MB.

Boot tested this on OMAP5 evm with and without LPAE.
Signed-off-by: NR Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

This can be local to mach-omap2.
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Several C files in arch/arm/mach-omap* and arch/arm/plat-omap declare
functions that are used by other files, but don't include the header
file where the prototype is declared.  This results in the following
warnings from sparse:

    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:114:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_pending' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:186:13: warning: symbol 'omap2_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:191:13: warning: symbol 'omap3_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:196:13: warning: symbol 'ti81xx_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:233:39: warning: symbol 'omap2_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:242:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:265:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:291:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_prepare_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:306:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_resume_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:312:39: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:59:12: warning: symbol 'omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-display.c:133:13: warning: symbol 'zoom_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:73:13: warning: symbol 'omap_init_consistent_dma_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_flags' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:179:13: warning: symbol 'omap1_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap1/reset.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'omap1_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fix by including the appropriate header files.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy <svadivu@ti.com>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Several platforms are now using the memblock_alloc+memblock_free+
memblock_remove trick to obtain memory which won't be mapped in the
kernel's page tables.  Most platforms do this (correctly) in the
->reserve callback.  However, OMAP has started to call these functions
outside of this callback, and this is extremely unsafe - memory will
not be unmapped, and could well be given out after memblock is no
longer responsible for its management.

So, provide arm_memblock_steal() to perform this function, and ensure
that it panic()s if it is used inappropriately.  Convert everyone
over, including OMAP.

As a result, OMAP with OMAP4_ERRATA_I688 enabled will panic on boot
with this change.  Mark this option as BROKEN and make it depend on
BROKEN.  OMAP needs to be fixed, or 137d105d (ARM: OMAP4: Fix
errata i688 with MPU interconnect barriers.) reverted until such
time it can be fixed correctly.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Allocate the memory to save secure ram context which needs
to be done when MPU is hitting OFF mode.

The ROM code expects a physical address to this memory
and hence use memblock APIs to reserve this memory as part
of .reserve() callback. Maximum size as per secure RAM requirements
is allocated.

To keep omap1 build working, omap-secure.h file is created
under plat-omap directory.
Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-by: NVishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

On OMAP secure/emulation devices, certain APIs are exported by secure
code. Add an infrastructure so that relevant operations on secure
devices can be implemented using it.

While at this, rename omap44xx-smc.S to omap-smc.S since the common APIs
can be used on other OMAP's too.
Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-by: NVishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>