Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 3 年多

通知 13
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 5月, 2009 10 次提交
  3. 15 5月, 2009 3 次提交
    • B
      powerpc: Fix PCI ROM access · ad892a63
      由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于 
      A couple of issues crept in since about 2.6.27 related to accessing PCI
device ROMs on various powerpc machines.

First, historically, we don't allocate the ROM resource in the resource
tree. I'm not entirely certain of why, I susepct they often contained
garbage on x86 but it's hard to tell. This causes the current generic
code to always call pci_assign_resource() when trying to access the said
ROM from sysfs, which will try to re-assign some new address regardless
of what the ROM BAR was already set to at boot time. This can be a
problem on hypervisor platforms like pSeries where we aren't supposed
to move PCI devices around (and in fact probably can't).

Second, our code that generates the PCI tree from the OF device-tree
(instead of doing config space probing) which we mostly use on pseries
at the moment, didn't set the (new) flag IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN on any
resource. That means that any attempt at re-assigning such a resource
with pci_assign_resource() would fail due to resource_alignment()
returning 0.

This fixes this by doing these two things:

 - The code that calculates resource flags based on the OF device-node
is improved to set IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN on any valid BAR, and while at
it also set IORESOURCE_READONLY for ROMs since we were lacking that too

 - We now allocate ROM resources as part of the resource tree. However
to limit the chances of nasty conflicts due to busted firmwares, we
only do it on the second pass of our two-passes allocation scheme,
so that all valid and enabled BARs get precedence.

This brings pSeries back the ability to access PCI ROMs via sysfs (and
thus initialize various video cards from X etc...).
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      ad892a63
    • B
      powerpc/pseries: Really fix the oprofile CPU type on pseries · b173f03d
      由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于 
      My previous pach for fixing the oprofile CPU type got somewhat mismerged
(by my fault) when it collided with another related patch. This should
finally (fingers crossed) fix the whole thing.

We make sure we keep the -old- oprofile type and CPU type whenever
one of them was specified in the first pass through the function.
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      b173f03d
    • B
      powerpc: Allow mem=x cmdline to work with 4G+ · 49a84965
      由 Becky Bruce 提交于 
      We're currently choking on mem=4g (and above) due to memory_limit
being specified as an unsigned long. Make memory_limit
phys_addr_t to fix this.
Signed-off-by: NBecky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      49a84965
  5. 01 5月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 29 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 27 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 23 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 22 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 21 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 07 4月, 2009 12 次提交
  21. 03 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  23. 02 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  25. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner · 99b76233
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
in module refcount underflow.

We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
and ->data.

But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
some thoughts.

->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
protection.

rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
We definitely don't want such modular code.

Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.

So, let's nuke it.

Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      99b76233
  27. 27 3月, 2009 2 次提交
    • B
      powerpc: Fix bugs introduced by sysfs changes · ec78c8ac
      由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于 
      Rusty's patch to change our sysfs access to various registers
to use smp_call_function_single() introduced a whole bunch of
warnings. This fixes them. This version also fixes an actual
bug in here where it did mtspr instead of mfspr when reading
the files
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      ec78c8ac
    • J
      powerpc: Sanitize stack pointer in signal handling code · efbda860
      由 Josh Boyer 提交于 
      On powerpc64 machines running 32-bit userspace, we can get garbage bits in the
stack pointer passed into the kernel.  Most places handle this correctly, but
the signal handling code uses the passed value directly for allocating signal
stack frames.

This fixes the issue by introducing a get_clean_sp function that returns a
sanitized stack pointer.  For 32-bit tasks on a 64-bit kernel, the stack
pointer is masked correctly.  In all other cases, the stack pointer is simply
returned.

Additionally, we pass an 'is_32' parameter to get_sigframe now in order to
get the properly sanitized stack.  The callers are know to be 32 or 64-bit
statically.
Signed-off-by: NJosh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      efbda860