Use the new behaviour of {flock,posix}_file_lock(F_UNLCK) to determine if
we held a lock, and only send the RPC request to the server if this was the
case.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Currently it is possible for a task to remove its locks at the same time as
the NLM recovery thread is trying to recover them. This quickly leads to an
Oops.
Protect the locks using an rw semaphore while they are being recovered.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Add a helper function to simplify the freeing of NLM client requests.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The struct file_lock does not carry a properly initialised lock,
so don't copy it as if it were.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

NLM_LCK_DENIED is a valid error return for an NLM_CANCEL call by the
client.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The patch "stop abusing file_lock_list introduces a couple of bugs since
the locks may be copied and need to be removed from the lists when they are
destroyed.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Currently lockd directly access the file_lock_list from fs/locks.c.
It does so to mark locks granted or reclaimable.  This is very
suboptimal, because a) lockd needs to poke into locks.c internals, and
b) it needs to iterate over all locks in the system for marking locks
granted or reclaimable.

This patch adds lists for granted and reclaimable locks to the nlm_host
structure instead, and adds locks to those.

nlmclnt_lock:
	now adds the lock to h_granted instead of setting the
	NFS_LCK_GRANTED, still O(1)

nlmclnt_mark_reclaim:
	goes away completely, replaced by a list_splice_init.
	Complexity reduced from O(locks in the system) to O(1)

reclaimer:
	iterates over h_reclaim now, complexity reduced from
	O(locks in the system) to O(locks per nlm_host)
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Instead we use the nlm_lockowner->pid.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Currently, nlm_alloc_call tests for a signal before it even tries to
allocate memory.
Fix it so that it tries at least once.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

In theory, NLM specs assure us that the server will only reply LCK_GRANTED or
LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD to our NLM_UNLOCK request.

In practice, we should not assume this to be the case, and the code will
currently Oops if we do.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

 If the server returns NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS, we currently retry the
 entire NLM_CANCEL request. This may end up looping forever unless the
 server changes its mind (why would it do that, though?).

 Ensure that we limit the number of retries (to 3).

 See bug# 5957 in bugzilla.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

 The OpenGroup docs state that the arguments "block", "exclusive" and
 "alock" must exactly match the arguments for the lock call that we are
 trying to cancel.
 Currently, "block" is always set to false, which is wrong.

 See bug# 5956 on bugzilla.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

 Clean up: Every ULP that uses the in-kernel RPC client, except the NLM
 client, sets cl_chatty.  There's no reason why NLM shouldn't set it, so
 just get rid of cl_chatty and always be verbose.

 Test-plan:
 Compile with CONFIG_NFS enabled.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

 Shrink the RPC task structure. Instead of storing separate pointers
 for task->tk_exit and task->tk_release, put them in a structure.

 Also pass the user data pointer as a parameter instead of passing it via
 task->tk_calldata. This enables us to nest callbacks.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

This is the fs/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch.

Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in fs/.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Use schedule_timeout_{,un}interruptible() instead of
set_current_state()/schedule_timeout() to reduce kernel size.  Also use helper
functions to convert between human time units and jiffies rather than constant
HZ division to avoid rounding errors.
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1. Establish a simple API for process freezing defined in linux/include/sched.h:

   frozen(process)		Check for frozen process
   freezing(process)		Check if a process is being frozen
   freeze(process)		Tell a process to freeze (go to refrigerator)
   thaw_process(process)	Restart process
   frozen_process(process)	Process is frozen now

2. Remove all references to PF_FREEZE and PF_FROZEN from all
   kernel sources except sched.h

3. Fix numerous locations where try_to_freeze is manually done by a driver

4. Remove the argument that is no longer necessary from two function calls.

5. Some whitespace cleanup

6. Clear potential race in refrigerator (provides an open window of PF_FREEZE
   cleared before setting PF_FROZEN, recalc_sigpending does not check
   PF_FROZEN).

This patch does not address the problem of freeze_processes() violating the rule
that a task may only modify its own flags by setting PF_FREEZE. This is not clean
in an SMP environment. freeze(process) is therefore not SMP safe!
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

 If the lock blocks, the server may send us a GRANTED message that
 races with the reply to our LOCK request. Make sure that we catch
 the GRANTED by queueing up our request on the nlm_blocked list
 before we send off the first LOCK rpc call.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!