1. 06 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • K
      drm/i915: Correct eDP panel power sequencing delay computations · f01eca2e
      Keith Packard 提交于
      Store the panel power sequencing delays in the dp private structure,
      rather than the global device structure. Who knows, maybe we'll get
      more than one eDP device in the future.
      
      From the eDP spec, we need the following numbers:
      
       T1 + T3	Power on to Aux Channel operation (panel_power_up_delay)
      
      		This marks how long it takes the panel to boot up and
      		get ready to receive aux channel communications.
      
       T8		Video signal to backlight on (backlight_on_delay)
      
      		Once a valid video signal is being sent to the device,
      		it can take a while before the panel is actuall
      		showing useful data. This delay allows the panel
      		to get something reasonable up before the backlight
      		is turned on.
      
       T9		Backlight off to video off (backlight_off_delay)
      
      		Turning the backlight off can take a moment, so
      		this delay makes sure there is still valid video
      		data on the screen.
      
       T10		Video off to power off (panel_power_down_delay)
      
      		Presumably this delay allows the panel to perform
      		an orderly shutdown of the display.
      
       T11 + T12	Power off to power on (panel_power_cycle_delay)
      
      		So, once you turn the panel off, you have to wait a
      		while before you can turn it back on. This delay is
      		usually the longest in the entire sequence.
      
      Neither the VBIOS source code nor the hardware documentation has a
      clear mapping between the delay values they provide and those required
      by the eDP spec. The VBIOS code actually uses two different labels for
      the delay values in the five words of the relevant VBT table.
      
      **** MORE LATER ***
      
      Look at both the current hardware register settings and the VBT
      specified panel power sequencing timings. Use the maximum of the two
      delays, to make sure things work reliably. If there is no VBT data,
      then those values will be initialized to zero, so we'll just use the
      values as programmed in the hardware. Note that the BIOS just fetches
      delays from the VBT table to place in the hardware registers, so we
      should get the same values from both places, except for rounding.
      
      VBT doesn't provide any values for T1 or T2, so we'll always just use
      the hardware value for that.
      
      The panel power up delay is thus T1 + T2 + T3, which should be
      sufficient in all cases.
      
      The panel power down delay is T1 + T2 + T12, using T1+T2 as a proxy
      for T11, which isn't available anywhere.
      
      For the backlight delays, the eDP spec says T6 + T8 is the delay from the
      end of link training to backlight on and T9 is the delay from
      backlight off until video off. The hardware provides a 'backlight on'
      delay, which I'm taking to be T6 + T8 while the VBT provides something
      called 'T7', which I'm assuming is s
      
      On the macbook air I'm testing with, this yields a power-up delay of
      over 200ms and a power-down delay of over 600ms. It all works now, but
      we're frobbing these power controls several times during mode setting,
      making the whole process take an awfully long time.
      Signed-off-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
      f01eca2e
  2. 16 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 30 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 19 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 14 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  6. 09 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 30 6月, 2011 3 次提交
  9. 27 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 10 6月, 2011 3 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  12. 18 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 14 5月, 2011 9 次提交
  14. 11 5月, 2011 6 次提交
  15. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 24 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • C
      Revert "drm/i915: Don't save/restore hardware status page address register" · f0c86024
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      This reverts commit a7a75c8f.
      
      There are two different variations on how Intel hardware addresses the
      "Hardware Status Page". One as a location in physical memory and the
      other as an offset into the virtual memory of the GPU, used in more
      recent chipsets. (The HWS itself is a cacheable region of memory which
      the GPU can write to without requiring CPU synchronisation, used for
      updating various details of hardware state, such as the position of
      the GPU head in the ringbuffer, the last breadcrumb seqno, etc).
      
      These two types of addresses were updated in different locations of code
      - one inline with the ringbuffer initialisation, and the other during
      device initialisation. (The HWS page is logically associated with
      the rings, and there is one HWS page per ring.) During resume, only the
      ringbuffers were being re-initialised along with the virtual HWS page,
      leaving the older physical address HWS untouched. This then caused a
      hang on the older gen3/4 (915GM, 945GM, 965GM) the first time we tried
      to synchronise the GPU as the breadcrumbs were never being updated.
      Reported-and-tested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Reported-by: NJan Niehusmann <jan@gondor.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NJustin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NMichael "brot" Groh <brot@minad.de>
      Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NZhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
      f0c86024
    • C
      Revert "drm/i915: Don't save/restore hardware status page address register" · 968b503e
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      This reverts commit a7a75c8f.
      
      There are two different variations on how Intel hardware addresses the
      "Hardware Status Page". One as a location in physical memory and the
      other as an offset into the virtual memory of the GPU, used in more
      recent chipsets. (The HWS itself is a cacheable region of memory which
      the GPU can write to without requiring CPU synchronisation, used for
      updating various details of hardware state, such as the position of
      the GPU head in the ringbuffer, the last breadcrumb seqno, etc).
      
      These two types of addresses were updated in different locations of code
      - one inline with the ringbuffer initialisation, and the other during
      device initialisation. (The HWS page is logically associated with
      the rings, and there is one HWS page per ring.) During resume, only the
      ringbuffers were being re-initialised along with the virtual HWS page,
      leaving the older physical address HWS untouched. This then caused a
      hang on the older gen3/4 (915GM, 945GM, 965GM) the first time we tried
      to synchronise the GPU as the breadcrumbs were never being updated.
      Reported-and-tested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Reported-by: NJan Niehusmann <jan@gondor.com>
      Reported-by: NJustin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NMichael "brot" Groh <brot@minad.de>
      Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      968b503e
  17. 07 3月, 2011 1 次提交