Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 8月, 2012 7 次提交
  3. 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 26 7月, 2012 3 次提交
  7. 24 7月, 2012 7 次提交
  9. 06 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 03 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 09 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      sched/fair: fix lots of kernel-doc warnings · cd96891d
      由 Randy Dunlap 提交于 
      Fix lots of new kernel-doc warnings in kernel/sched/fair.c:

  Warning(kernel/sched/fair.c:3625): No description found for parameter 'env'
  Warning(kernel/sched/fair.c:3625): Excess function parameter 'sd' description in 'update_sg_lb_stats'
  Warning(kernel/sched/fair.c:3735): No description found for parameter 'env'
  Warning(kernel/sched/fair.c:3735): Excess function parameter 'sd' description in 'update_sd_pick_busiest'
  Warning(kernel/sched/fair.c:3735): Excess function parameter 'this_cpu' description in 'update_sd_pick_busiest'
  .. more warnings
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd96891d
  15. 06 6月, 2012 6 次提交
  17. 30 5月, 2012 9 次提交
  19. 23 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler" · ab0cce56
      由 Jiri Olsa 提交于 
      This reverts commit cb04ff9a ("sched, perf: Use a single
callback into the scheduler").

Before this change was introduced, the process switch worked
like this (wrt. to perf event schedule):

     schedule (prev, next)
       - schedule out all perf events for prev
       - switch to next
       - schedule in all perf events for current (next)

After the commit, the process switch looks like:

     schedule (prev, next)
       - schedule out all perf events for prev
       - schedule in all perf events for (next)
       - switch to next

The problem is, that after we schedule perf events in, the pmu
is enabled and we can receive events even before we make the
switch to next - so "current" still being prev process (event
SAMPLE data are filled based on the value of the "current"
process).

Thats exactly what we see for test__PERF_RECORD test. We receive
SAMPLES with PID of the process that our tracee is scheduled
from.

Discussed with Peter Zijlstra:

 > Bah!, yeah I guess reverting is the right thing for now. Sad
 > though.
 >
 > So by having the two hooks we have a black-spot between them
 > where we receive no events at all, this black-spot covers the
 > hand-over of current and we thus don't receive the 'wrong'
 > events.
 >
 > I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and
 > clean up the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120523111302.GC1638@m.brq.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ab0cce56
  21. 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 17 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      sched: Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants and dysfunctional knobs · 8e7fbcbc
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      It's been broken forever (i.e. it's not scheduling in a power
aware fashion), as reported by Suresh and others sending
patches, and nobody cares enough to fix it properly ...
so remove it to make space free for something better.

There's various problems with the code as it stands today, first
and foremost the user interface which is bound to topology
levels and has multiple values per level. This results in a
state explosion which the administrator or distro needs to
master and almost nobody does.

Furthermore large configuration state spaces aren't good, it
means the thing doesn't just work right because it's either
under so many impossibe to meet constraints, or even if
there's an achievable state workloads have to be aware of
it precisely and can never meet it for dynamic workloads.

So pushing this kind of decision to user-space was a bad idea
even with a single knob - it's exponentially worse with knobs
on every node of the topology.

There is a proposal to replace the user interface with a single
3 state knob:

 sched_balance_policy := { performance, power, auto }

where 'auto' would be the preferred default which looks at things
like Battery/AC mode and possible cpufreq state or whatever the hw
exposes to show us power use expectations - but there's been no
progress on it in the past many months.

Aside from that, the actual implementation of the various knobs
is known to be broken. There have been sporadic attempts at
fixing things but these always stop short of reaching a mergable
state.

Therefore this wholesale removal with the hopes of spurring
people who care to come forward once again and work on a
coherent replacement.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1326104915.2442.53.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      8e7fbcbc
  25. 14 5月, 2012 1 次提交