1. 07 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  2. 04 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  3. 03 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 07 11月, 2008 2 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: don't give up looking for space so easily in __jbd2_log_wait_for_space · 8c3f25d8
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Commit 23f8b79e introducd a regression because it assumed that if
      there were no transactions ready to be checkpointed, that no progress
      could be made on making space available in the journal, and so the
      journal should be aborted.  This assumption is false; it could be the
      case that simply calling jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() will recover the
      necessary space, or, for small journals, the currently committing
      transaction could be responsible for chewing up the required space in
      the log, so we need to wait for the currently committing transaction
      to finish before trying to force a checkpoint operation.
      
      This patch fixes a bug reported by Mihai Harpau at:
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469582
      
      This patch fixes a bug reported by François Valenduc at:
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11840Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
      Cc: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
      8c3f25d8
    • T
      jbd: don't give up looking for space so easily in __log_wait_for_space · e219cca0
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Commit be07c4ed introducd a regression because it assumed that if
      there were no transactions ready to be checkpointed, that no progress
      could be made on making space available in the journal, and so the
      journal should be aborted.  This assumption is false; it could be the
      case that simply calling cleanup_journal_tail() will recover the
      necessary space, or, for small journals, the currently committing
      transaction could be responsible for chewing up the required space in
      the log, so we need to wait for the currently committing transaction
      to finish before trying to force a checkpoint operation.
      
      This patch fixes the bug reported by Meelis Roos at:
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
      Cc: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
      e219cca0
  5. 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      saner FASYNC handling on file close · 233e70f4
      Al Viro 提交于
      As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
      need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
      creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.
      
      So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
      file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set.  And lose that
      crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
      don't have to bother anymore.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      233e70f4
  6. 31 10月, 2008 5 次提交
  7. 29 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 28 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  9. 29 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 28 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 27 10月, 2008 3 次提交
  12. 26 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  13. 24 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  14. 23 10月, 2008 13 次提交