Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 4 年多

通知 15
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 01 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: check our parent dir when doing a compare send · ebdad913
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      When doing a send with a parent subvol we will check to see if the file we are
acting on is being overwritten and move it if we think it may be needed further
down the line during the send.  We check this by checking its directory and
making sure it existed in the parent and making sure the file existed in the
parent.  The problem with this check is that if we create a directory and a file
in that directory, and then snapshot, and then remove and re-create that same
directory and file with different inode numbers and then try to snapshot and
send with the original parent we will try and save the original file inside of
that directory.  This is a problem because during the receive we move the
directory out of the way because it is a completely new inode, which makes us
unable to find the old file inside of the directory when we try to move that out
of the way for the overwrite.  We fix this by checking the parent directory of
the inode we think we are overwriting.  If the parent directory generation in
the send root != the parent directory generation in the parent root then we know
it is a completely new directory and we need not bother with moving the file out
of the way because it would have been completely destroyed.  This fixes bz
60673.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      ebdad913
  3. 14 6月, 2013 4 次提交
  5. 07 5月, 2013 4 次提交
    • E
      btrfs: make static code static & remove dead code · 48a3b636
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.

removed functions:

btrfs_iref_to_path()
__btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item()
find_eb_for_page()
btrfs_find_block_group()
range_straddles_pages()
extent_range_uptodate()
btrfs_file_extent_length()
btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid()
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush()

btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging.
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are
left for symmetry.

ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      48a3b636
    • T
      Btrfs: fix error handling in btrfs_ioctl_send() · ecc7ada7
      由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于 
      fget() returns NULL if error. So, we should check NULL or not.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      ecc7ada7
    • T
      Btrfs: remove unused variable in __process_changed_new_xattr() · ba1eeaac
      由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于 
      Variable 'p' is not used any more. So, remove it.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      ba1eeaac
    • S
      Btrfs: allow omitting stream header and end-cmd for btrfs send · c2c71324
      由 Stefan Behrens 提交于 
      Two new flags are added to allow omitting the stream header and the
end command for btrfs send streams. This is used in cases where you
send multiple snapshots back-to-back in one stream.

This used to be encoded like this (with 2 snapshots in this example):
<stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> +
<stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + EOF

The new format (if the two new flags are used) is this one:
<stream header> + <sequence of commands> +
                  <sequence of commands> + <end cmd>

Note that the currently existing receivers treat <end cmd> only as
an indication that a new <stream header> is following. This means,
you can just skip the sequence <end cmd> <stream header> without
loosing compatibility. As long as an EOF is following, the currently
existing receivers handle the new format (if the two new flags are
used) exactly as the old one.

So what is the benefit of this change? The goal is to be able to use
a single stream (one TCP connection) to multiplex a request/response
handshake plus Btrfs send streams, all in the same stream. In this
case you cannot evaluate an EOF condition as an end of the Btrfs send
stream. You need something else, and the <end cmd> is just perfect
for this purpose.

The summary is:
The format change is driven by the need to send several Btrfs send
streams over a single TCP connections, with the ability for a repeated
request/response handshake in the middle. And this format change does
not break any existing tool, it is completely compatible.

You could compare the old behaviour of the Btrfs send stream to the
one of ftp where you need a seperate request/response channel and
newly opened data transfer channels for each file, while the new
behaviour is more like http using a single stream for everything.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      c2c71324
  7. 28 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 21 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 17 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 26 10月, 2012 3 次提交
  19. 04 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 02 10月, 2012 21 次提交