- 16 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The new TASK_IDLE state (TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | __TASK_NOLOAD) is not much used. One way to make it easier to use is to add wait_event*() family functions that make use of it. This patch adds: wait_event_idle() wait_event_idle_timeout() wait_event_idle_exclusive() wait_event_idle_exclusive_timeout() This set was chosen because lustre needs them before it can discard its own l_wait_event() macro. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NJames Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrick Farrell <paf@cray.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
__poll_t is also used as wait key in some waitqueues. Verify that wait_..._poll() gets __poll_t as key and provide a helper for wakeup functions to get back to that __poll_t value. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Chen 提交于
Now that we have added breaks in the wait queue scan and allow bookmark on scan position, we put this logic in the wake_up_page_bit function. We can have very long page wait list in large system where multiple pages share the same wait list. We break the wake up walk here to allow other cpus a chance to access the list, and not to disable the interrupts when traversing the list for too long. This reduces the interrupt and rescheduling latency, and excessive page wait queue lock hold time. [ v2: Remove bookmark_wake_function ] Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tim Chen 提交于
We encountered workloads that have very long wake up list on large systems. A waker takes a long time to traverse the entire wake list and execute all the wake functions. We saw page wait list that are up to 3700+ entries long in tests of large 4 and 8 socket systems. It took 0.8 sec to traverse such list during wake up. Any other CPU that contends for the list spin lock will spin for a long time. It is a result of the numa balancing migration of hot pages that are shared by many threads. Multiple CPUs waking are queued up behind the lock, and the last one queued has to wait until all CPUs did all the wakeups. The page wait list is traversed with interrupt disabled, which caused various problems. This was the original cause that triggered the NMI watch dog timer in: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9800303/ . Only extending the NMI watch dog timer there helped. This patch bookmarks the waker's scan position in wake list and break the wake up walk, to allow access to the list before the waker resume its walk down the rest of the wait list. It lowers the interrupt and rescheduling latency. This patch also provides a performance boost when combined with the next patch to break up page wakeup list walk. We saw 22% improvement in the will-it-scale file pread2 test on a Xeon Phi system running 256 threads. [ v2: Merged in Linus' changes to remove the bookmark_wake_function, and simply access to flags. ] Reported-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Tested-by: NKan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
These are the few pending fixes I have queued up for v4.13-final. One is a a generic regression fix for recursive loops on kmod and the other one is a trivial print out correction. During the v4.13 development we assumed that recursive kmod loops were no longer possible. Clearly that is not true. The regression fix makes use of a new killable wait. We use a killable wait to be paranoid in how signals might be sent to modprobe and only accept a proper SIGKILL. The signal will only be available to userspace to issue *iff* a thread has already entered a wait state, and that happens only if we've already throttled after 50 kmod threads have been hit. Note that although it may seem excessive to trigger a failure afer 5 seconds if all kmod thread remain busy, prior to the series of changes that went into v4.13 we would actually *always* fatally fail any request which came in if the limit was already reached. The new waiting implemented in v4.13 actually gives us *more* breathing room -- the wait for 5 seconds is a wait for *any* kmod thread to finish. We give up and fail *iff* no kmod thread has finished and they're *all* running straight for 5 consecutive seconds. If 50 kmod threads are running consecutively for 5 seconds something else must be really bad. Recursive loops with kmod are bad but they're also hard to implement properly as a selftest without currently fooling current userspace tools like kmod [1]. For instance kmod will complain when you run depmod if it finds a recursive loop with symbol dependency between modules as such this type of recursive loop cannot go upstream as the modules_install target will fail after running depmod. These tests already exist on userspace kmod upstream though (refer to the testsuite/module-playground/mod-loop-*.c files). The same is not true if request_module() is used though, or worst if aliases are used. Likewise the issue with 64-bit kernels booting 32-bit userspace without a binfmt handler built-in is also currently not detected and proactively avoided by userspace kmod tools, or kconfig for all architectures. Although we could complain in the kernel when some of these individual recursive issues creep up, proactively avoiding these situations in userspace at build time is what we should keep striving for. Lastly, since recursive loops could happen with kmod it may mean recursive loops may also be possible with other kernel usermode helpers, this should be investigated and long term if we can come up with a more sensible generic solution even better! [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git/log/?h=20170809-kmod-for-v4.13-final [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git This patch (of 3): This wait is similar to wait_event_interruptible_timeout() but only accepts SIGKILL interrupt signal. Other signals are ignored. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170809234635.13443-2-mcgrof@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com> Cc: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgetc.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
A couple of kerneldoc comments in <linux/wait.h> had incorrect names for macro parameters, with this unsightly result: ./include/linux/wait.h:555: warning: No description found for parameter 'wq' ./include/linux/wait.h:555: warning: Excess function parameter 'wq_head' description in 'wait_event_interruptible_hrtimeout' ./include/linux/wait.h:759: warning: No description found for parameter 'wq_head' ./include/linux/wait.h:759: warning: Excess function parameter 'wq' description in 'wait_event_killable' Correct the comments and kill the warnings. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724135800.769c4042@lwn.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 20 6月, 2017 9 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
So I've noticed a number of instances where it was not obvious from the code whether ->task_list was for a wait-queue head or a wait-queue entry. Furthermore, there's a number of wait-queue users where the lists are not for 'tasks' but other entities (poll tables, etc.), in which case the 'task_list' name is actively confusing. To clear this all up, name the wait-queue head and entry list structure fields unambiguously: struct wait_queue_head::task_list => ::head struct wait_queue_entry::task_list => ::entry For example, this code: rqw->wait.task_list.next != &wait->task_list ... is was pretty unclear (to me) what it's doing, while now it's written this way: rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry ... which makes it pretty clear that we are iterating a list until we see the head. Other examples are: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->task_list, task_list) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.task_list, task_list) { ... where it's unclear (to me) what we are iterating, and during review it's hard to tell whether it's trying to walk a wait-queue entry (which would be a bug), while now it's written as: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->head, entry) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.head, entry) { Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
The wait_bit*() types and APIs are mixed into wait.h, but they are a pretty orthogonal extension of wait-queues. Furthermore, only about 50 kernel files use these APIs, while over 1000 use the regular wait-queue functionality. So clean up the main wait.h by moving the wait-bit functionality out of it, into a separate .h and .c file: include/linux/wait_bit.h for types and APIs kernel/sched/wait_bit.c for the implementation Update all header dependencies. This reduces the size of wait.h rather significantly, by about 30%. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
So there's over 300 CPP macro line-continuation backslashes in include/linux/wait.h (!!), which are aligned vertically to make the macro maze a bit more navigable. The recent renames and reorganization broke some of them, and instead of re-aligning them in every patch (which would add a lot of stylistic noise to the patches and make them less readable), I just ignored them - and fixed them up in a single go in this patch. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Contrary to kernel tradition, most of the bit-wait function prototypes in <linux/wait.h> don't fully define the parameter names, they only list the types: int out_of_line_wait_on_bit_timeout(void *, int, wait_bit_action_f *, unsigned, unsigned long); ... which is pretty passive-aggressive in terms of informing the reader about what these functions are doing. Fill in the parameter names, such as: int out_of_line_wait_on_bit_timeout(void *word, int, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned int mode, unsigned long timeout); Also turn spurious (and inconsistently utilized) cases of 'unsigned' into 'unsigned int'. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
So wait-bit-queue head variables are often named: struct wait_bit_queue *q ... which is a bit ambiguous and super confusing, because they clearly suggest wait-queue head semantics and behavior (they rhyme with the old wait_queue_t *q naming), while they are extended wait-queue _entries_, not heads! They are misnomers in two ways: - the 'wait_bit_queue' leaves open the question of whether it's an entry or a head - the 'q' parameter and local variable naming falsely implies that it's a 'queue' - while it's an entry. This resulted in sometimes confusing cases such as: finish_wait(wq, &q->wait); where the 'q' is not a wait-queue head, but a wait-bit-queue entry. So improve this all by standardizing wait-bit-queue nomenclature similar to wait-queue head naming: struct wait_bit_queue => struct wait_bit_queue_entry q => wbq_entry Which makes it all a much clearer: struct wait_bit_queue_entry *wbq_entry ... and turns the former confusing piece of code into: finish_wait(wq_head, &wbq_entry->wq_entry; which IMHO makes it apparently clear what we are doing, without having to analyze the context of the code: we are adding a wait-queue entry to a regular wait-queue head, which entry is embedded in a wait-bit-queue entry. I'm not a big fan of acronyms, but repeating wait_bit_queue_entry in field and local variable names is too long, so Hopefully it's clear enough that 'wq_' prefixes stand for wait-queues, while 'wbq_' prefixes stand for wait-bit-queues. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Rename 'struct wait_bit_queue::wait' to ::wq_entry, to more clearly name it as a wait-queue entry. Propagate it to a couple of usage sites where the wait-bit-queue internals are exposed. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
The wait-queue head parameters and variables are named in a couple of ways, we have the following variants currently: wait_queue_head_t *q wait_queue_head_t *wq wait_queue_head_t *head In particular the 'wq' naming is ambiguous in the sense whether it's a wait-queue head or entry name - as entries were often named 'wait'. ( Not to mention the confusion of any readers coming over from workqueue-land. ) Standardize all this around a single, unambiguous parameter and variable name: struct wait_queue_head *wq_head which is easy to grep for and also rhymes nicely with the wait-queue entry naming: struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry Also rename: struct __wait_queue_head => struct wait_queue_head ... and use this struct type to migrate from typedefs usage to 'struct' usage, which is more in line with existing kernel practices. Don't touch any external users and preserve the main wait_queue_head_t typedef. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
So the various wait-queue entry variables in include/linux/wait.h and kernel/sched/wait.c are named in a colorfully inconsistent way: wait_queue_entry_t *wait wait_queue_entry_t *__wait (even in plain C code!) wait_queue_entry_t *q (!) wait_queue_entry_t *new (making anyone who knows C++ cringe) wait_queue_entry_t *old I think part of the reason for the inconsistency is the constant apparent confusion about what a wait queue 'head' versus 'entry' is. ( Some of the documentation talks about a 'wait descriptor', which is the wait-queue entry itself - further adding to the confusion. ) The most common name is 'wait', but that in itself is somewhat ambiguous as well, as it does not really make it clear whether it's a wait-queue entry or head. To improve all this name the wait-queue entry structure parameters and variables consistently and push through this naming into all the wait.h and wait.c code: struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry The 'wq_' prefix makes it easy to grep for, and we also use the opportunity to move away from the typedef to a plain 'struct' naming: in the kernel we typically reserve typedefs for cases where a C structure is really small and somewhat opaque - such as pte_t. wait-queue entries are neither small nor opaque, so use the more standard 'struct xxx_entry' list management code nomenclature instead. ( We don't touch external users, and we preserve the typedef as well for actual wait-queue users, to reduce unnecessary churn. ) Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Rename: wait_queue_t => wait_queue_entry_t 'wait_queue_t' was always a slight misnomer: its name implies that it's a "queue", but in reality it's a queue *entry*. The 'real' queue is the wait queue head, which had to carry the name. Start sorting this out by renaming it to 'wait_queue_entry_t'. This also allows the real structure name 'struct __wait_queue' to lose its double underscore and become 'struct wait_queue_entry', which is the more canonical nomenclature for such data types. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 09 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The scheduler header file split and cleanups ended up exposing a few nasty header file dependencies, and in particular it showed how we in <linux/wait.h> ended up depending on "signal_pending()", which now comes from <linux/sched/signal.h>. That's a very subtle and annoying dependency, which already caused a semantic merge conflict (see commit e58bc927 "Pull overlayfs updates from Miklos Szeredi", which added that fixup in the merge commit). It turns out that we can avoid this dependency _and_ improve code generation by moving the guts of the fairly nasty helper #define __wait_event_interruptible_locked() to out-of-line code. The code that includes the signal_pending() check is all in the slow-path where we actually go to sleep waiting for the event anyway, so using a helper function is the right thing to do. Using a helper function is also what we already did for the non-locked versions, see the "__wait_event*()" macros and the "prepare_to_wait*()" set of helper functions. We might want to try to unify all these macro games, we have a _lot_ of subtly different wait-event loops. But this is the minimal patch to fix the annoying header dependency. Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Add #include <linux/cred.h> dependencies to all .c files rely on sched.h doing that for them. Note that even if the count where we need to add extra headers seems high, it's still a net win, because <linux/sched.h> is included in over 2,200 files ... Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 26 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
ktime is a union because the initial implementation stored the time in scalar nanoseconds on 64 bit machine and in a endianess optimized timespec variant for 32bit machines. The Y2038 cleanup removed the timespec variant and switched everything to scalar nanoseconds. The union remained, but become completely pointless. Get rid of the union and just keep ktime_t as simple typedef of type s64. The conversion was done with coccinelle and some manual mopping up. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
-
- 30 9月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
The partial initialization of wait_queue_t in prepare_to_wait_event() looks ugly. This was done to shrink .text, but we can simply add the new helper which does the full initialization and shrink the compiled code a bit more. And. This way prepare_to_wait_event() can have more users. In particular we are ready to remove the signal_pending_state() checks from wait_bit_action_f helpers and change __wait_on_bit_lock() to use prepare_to_wait_event(). Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906140055.GA6167@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
__wait_on_bit_lock() doesn't need abort_exclusive_wait() too. Right now it can't use prepare_to_wait_event() (see the next change), but it can do the additional finish_wait() if action() fails. abort_exclusive_wait() no longer has callers, remove it. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906140053.GA6164@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
___wait_event() doesn't really need abort_exclusive_wait(), we can simply change prepare_to_wait_event() to remove the waiter from q->task_list if it was interrupted. This simplifies the code/logic, and this way prepare_to_wait_event() can have more users, see the next change. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160908164815.GA18801@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -- include/linux/wait.h | 7 +------ kernel/sched/wait.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Otherwise this logic only works if mode is "compatible" with another exclusive waiter. If some wq has both TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE waiters, abort_exclusive_wait() won't wait an uninterruptible waiter. The main user is __wait_on_bit_lock() and currently it is fine but only because TASK_KILLABLE includes TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and we do not have lock_page_interruptible() yet. Just use TASK_NORMAL and remove the "mode" arg from abort_exclusive_wait(). Yes, this means that (say) wake_up_interruptible() can wake up the non- interruptible waiter(s), but I think this is fine. And in fact I think that abort_exclusive_wait() must die, see the next change. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906140047.GA6157@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 19 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 24 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stafford Horne 提交于
I noticed the comment label 'wait_event' was wrong. Signed-off-by: NStafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456234768-24933-1-git-send-email-shorne@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 14 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Jan Stancek reported that I wrecked things for him by fixing things for Vladimir :/ His report was due to an UNINTERRUPTIBLE wait getting -EINTR, which should not be possible, however my previous patch made this possible by unconditionally checking signal_pending(). We cannot use current->state as was done previously, because the instruction after the store to that variable it can be changed. We must instead pass the initial state along and use that. Fixes: 68985633 ("sched/wait: Fix signal handling in bit wait helpers") Reported-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Reported-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Tested-by: NJan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Tested-by: NVladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Tested-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: hpa@zytor.com Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
The memory barrier in the helper wq_has_sleeper is needed by just about every user of waitqueue_active. This patch generalises it by making it take a wait_queue_head_t directly. The existing helper is renamed to skwq_has_sleeper. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Kosuku reports that there were a fair number of buggy waitqueue_active() users and this function deserves a big comment in order to avoid growing more. Reported-by: NKosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 23 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Arcangeli 提交于
This reverts commit 51360155 and adapts fs/userfaultfd.c to use the old version of that function. It didn't look robust to call __wake_up_common with "nr == 1" when we absolutely require wakeall semantics, but we've full control of what we insert in the two waitqueue heads of the blocked userfaults. No exclusive waitqueue risks to be inserted into those two waitqueue heads so we can as well stick to "nr == 1" of the old code and we can rely purely on the fact no waitqueue inserted in one of the two waitqueue heads we must enforce as wakeall, has wait->flags WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE set. Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Arcangeli 提交于
userfaultfd needs to wake all waitqueues (pass 0 as nr parameter), instead of the current hardcoded 1 (that would wake just the first waitqueue in the head list). Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Acked-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@gmail.com> Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yuanhan Liu 提交于
It's just a variant of wait_event_cmd(), with exclusive flag being set. For cases like RAID5, which puts many processes to sleep until 1/4 resources are free, a wake_up wakes up all processes to run, but there is one process being able to get the resource as it's protected by a spin lock. That ends up introducing heavy lock contentions, and hurts performance badly. Here introduce wait_event_exclusive_cmd to relieve the lock contention naturally by letting wake_up just wake up one process. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> v2: its assumed that wait*() and __wait*() have the same arguments - peterz Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NYuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Palmer Dabbelt 提交于
The implementations of wait_on_bit*() will only work with long-aligned memory on systems that don't support misaligned loads and stores. This patch changes the function prototypes to ensure that the compiler will enforce alignment. Running make defconfig make KFLAGS="-Werror" seems to indicate that, as of c56fb6564dcd ("Fix a misaligned load inside ptrace_attach()"), there are now no users of non-long-aligned calls to wait_on_bit*(). I additionally tried a few "make randconfig" attempts, none of which failed to compile for this reason. Signed-off-by: NPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bobby.prani@gmail.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: richard@nod.at Cc: vdavydov@parallels.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430453997-32459-3-git-send-email-palmer@dabbelt.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
It took me a few tries to figure out what this code did; lets rewrite it into a more regular form. The thing that makes this one 'special' is the BSG_F_BLOCK flag, if that is not set we're not supposed/allowed to block and should spin wait for completion. The (new) io_wait_event() will never see a false condition in case of the spinning and we will therefore not block. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Add a new wait_on_bit_timeout() helper, basically the same as wait_on_bit() except that it also takes a 'timeout' parameter. All the building blocks like bit_wait_timeout() and out_of_line_wait_on_bit_timeout() are already in place so the addition is rather simple. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422616476-2917-2-git-send-email-johan.hedberg@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 03 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
The patch e22b886a ("sched/wait: Add might_sleep() checks") introduced a bug in the raid5 subsystem. The function raid5_quiesce() (and resize_stripes()) uses the 'cmd' part to release and acquire a spinlock (so we call the sleep primitives in atomic context), and therefore we cannot do the might_sleep() check. Remove it. Fixes: e22b886a ("sched/wait: Add might_sleep() checks") Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.02.1502020935580.13510@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 04 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Provide better implementations of wait_event_freezable() APIs. The problem is with freezer_do_not_count(), it hides the thread from the freezer, even though this thread might not actually freeze/sleep at all. Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-d86fz1jmso9wjxa8jfpinp8o@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 28 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Add more might_sleep() checks, suppose someone put a wait_event() like thing in a wait loop.. Can't put might_sleep() in ___wait_event() because there's the locked primitives which call ___wait_event() with locks held. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: ilya.dryomov@inktank.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.119255706@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
There are a few places that call blocking primitives from wait loops, provide infrastructure to support this without the typical task_struct::state collision. We record the wakeup in wait_queue_t::flags which leaves task_struct::state free to be used by others. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: ilya.dryomov@inktank.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.051202318@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
In commit c1221321 sched: Allow wait_on_bit_action() functions to support a timeout I suggested that a "wait_on_bit_timeout()" interface would not meet my need. This isn't true - I was just over-engineering. Including a 'private' field in wait_bit_key instead of a focused "timeout" field was just premature generalization. If some other use is ever found, it can be generalized or added later. So this patch renames "private" to "timeout" with a meaning "stop waiting when "jiffies" reaches or passes "timeout", and adds two of the many possible wait..bit..timeout() interfaces: wait_on_page_bit_killable_timeout(), which is the one I want to use, and out_of_line_wait_on_bit_timeout() which is a reasonably general example. Others can be added as needed. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scot Doyle 提交于
The timeout may elapse without 0 being returned, such as when waiting on an unused queue. Document this possibility. Signed-off-by: NScot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.11.1408241710070.6462@localhost.localdomainSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-