Choose between atomic or non atomic connector dpms helper. If tda998x
is connected to a drm driver that does not support atomic modeset
calling drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms() causes a crash when the
connectors atomic state is not initialized. The patch implements a
driver specific connector dpms helper that calls
drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms() if driver supports DRIVER_ATOMIC
and otherwise it calls the legacy drm_helper_connector_dpms().

Fixes commit 9736e988 ("drm/i2c: tda998x: Add support for atomic
modesetting").
Signed-off-by: NJyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This partially reverts commit d56f57ac ("drm/gma500: Move to private
save/restore hooks") which removed these lines by mistake.
Reported-by: NSebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Tested-by: NSebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Currently host1x-instanciated devices have their dma_ops left to NULL,
which makes any DMA operation (like buffer import) on ARM64 fallback
to the dummy_dma_ops and fail with an error.

This patch calls of_dma_configure() with the host1x node when creating
such a device, so the proper DMA operations are set.
Suggested-by: NThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

The default DMA mask covers a 32 bits address range, but host1x devices
can address a larger range on TK1 and TX1. Set the DMA mask to the range
addressable when we use the IOMMU to prevent the use of bounce buffers.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

In amdgpu_connector_hotplug(), we need to start DP link
training only after we have received DPCD. The function
amdgpu_atombios_dp_get_dpcd() returns non-zero value only
when an error condition is met, otherwise returns zero.
So in case the function encounters an error, we need to
skip rest of the code and return from amdgpu_connector_hotplug()
immediately. Only when we are successfull in reading DPCD
pin, we should carry on with turning-on the monitor.
Signed-off-by: NArindam Nath <arindam.nath@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

This code path is not currently enabled now that we properly
respect the vce pg flags, so uncomment the actual pg calls
so the code is as it should be we are eventually able to
enable vce pg.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

If we don't disable it when vce is not in use, we use extra power
if vce pg is disabled.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

I missed this when cleaning up the vce pg handling.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Select between me and pfp properly.
Signed-off-by: NChunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We never ported that back to CIK, so we could run into VM faults here.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

with this event, powerplay can adjust current power state if needed.
Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This is needed to init the dynamic states without a display.  To be
used in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

On CI, we need to see if the number of crtcs changes to determine
whether or not we need to upload the mclk table again.  In practice
we don't currently upload the mclk table again after the initial load.
The only reason you would would be to add new states, e.g., for
arbitrary mclk setting which is not currently supported.
Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

On CI, we need to see if the number of crtcs changes to determine
whether or not we need to upload the mclk table again.  In practice
we don't currently upload the mclk table again after the initial load.
The only reason you would would be to add new states, e.g., for
arbitrary mclk setting which is not currently supported.
Acked-by: NJordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

commit 09731280
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 17 14:17:42 2016 +0200

    drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled

left the rpm wakelock assertions unbalanced if CONFIG_PM was disabled as
intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use() would return true without incrementing
the local bookkeeping required for the assertions.

Fixes: 09731280 ("drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1456434628-22574-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 135dc79e)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

During system suspend we need to first disable power wells then
unitialize the display core. In case power well support is disabled we
did this in the wrong order, so fix this up.

Fixes: d314cd43 ("drm/i915: fix handling of the disable_power_well module option")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
CC: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1456778945-5411-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 2622d79b)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

During DRAM initialization on certain ASpeed devices, an incorrect
bit (bit 10) was checked in the "SDRAM Bus Width Status" register
to determine DRAM width.

Query bit 6 instead in accordance with the Aspeed AST2050 datasheet v1.05.
Signed-off-by: NTimothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

commit 09731280
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 17 14:17:42 2016 +0200

    drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled

left the rpm wakelock assertions unbalanced if CONFIG_PM was disabled as
intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use() would return true without incrementing
the local bookkeeping required for the assertions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This can happen under some annoying circumstances, and is a quick fix
until more substantial changes can be made.

Fixed eDP mode changes on (at least) the Lenovo P50.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The error cleanup paths aren't quite correct and will crash upon
deferred probe.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
Reviewed-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

That should make user space bugs more obvious.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The event_data passed from pem_fini was not cleared upon initialization.
This caused NULL checks to pass and cast_const_phw_tonga_power_state to
attempt to dereference an invalid pointer. Clear the event_data in
pem_init and pem_fini before calling pem_handle_event.
Reviewed-by: NRex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NBradley Pankow <btpankow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

It has been observed that sometimes disabling the dc6 fails
and dc6 state pops back up, brief moment after disabling. This
has to be dmc save/restore timing issue or other bug in the
way dc states are handled.

Try to work around this issue as we don't have firmware fix
yet available. Verify that the value we wrote for the dmc sticks,
and also enforce it by rewriting it, if it didn't.

v2: Zero rereads on rewrite for extra paranoia (Imre)

Testcase: kms_flip/basic-flip-vs-dpms
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93768
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455811089-27884-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 779cb5d3)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The DMC can incorrectly run off and allow DC states on it's own. We
don't know the root-cause for this yet but this patch makes it more
visible.
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455808874-22089-2-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 832dba88)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

set_power_state defaults to no displays, so we need to update
the display configuration after setting up the powerstate on the
first call. In most cases this is not an issue since ends up
getting called multiple times at any given modeset and the proper
order is achieved in the display changed handling at the top of
the function.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NJordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

set_power_state defaults to no displays, so we need to update
the display configuration after setting up the powerstate on the
first call. In most cases this is not an issue since ends up
getting called multiple times at any given modeset and the proper
order is achieved in the display changed handling at the top of
the function.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NJordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

I.e., doesn't make sense to change power states or check the
temperature when the asic is powered off.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Looks like a copy paste typo when we added powerplay
support.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Looks like a copy/paste typo.
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Noticed-by: NDavid Panariti <David.Panariti@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Spotted-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93441
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455719489-3008-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 4d800030)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-13-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ecb24482)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-12-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 5b092174)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-11-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 3f3f42b8)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-10-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 6fa9a5ec)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.

While at it also add the missing reference around the HW access in
i915_interrupt_info().

v2:
- update the commit message mentioning that this also fixes the
  HW access in the interrupt info debugfs entry (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-9-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit e129649b)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-8-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit e27daab4)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-7-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 1c8fdda1)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-6-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 4feed0eb)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 6392f847)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The assumption when adding the intel_display_power_is_enabled() checks
was that if it returns success the power can't be turned off afterwards
during the HW access, which is guaranteed by modeset locks. This isn't
always true, so make sure we hold a dedicated reference for the time of
the access.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455296121-4742-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 12fda387)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>