- 10 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Williams 提交于
Given we have uninitialized list_heads being passed to list_add() it will always be the case that those uninitialized values randomly trigger the poison value. Especially since a list_add() operation will seed the stack with the poison value for later stack allocations to trip over. For example, see these two false positive reports: list_add attempted on force-poisoned entry WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:34 [..] NIP [c00000000043c390] __list_add+0xb0/0x150 LR [c00000000043c38c] __list_add+0xac/0x150 Call Trace: __list_add+0xac/0x150 (unreliable) __down+0x4c/0xf8 down+0x68/0x70 xfs_buf_lock+0x4c/0x150 [xfs] list_add attempted on force-poisoned entry(0000000000000500), new->next == d0000000059ecdb0, new->prev == 0000000000000500 WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:33 [..] NIP [c00000000042db78] __list_add+0xa8/0x140 LR [c00000000042db74] __list_add+0xa4/0x140 Call Trace: __list_add+0xa4/0x140 (unreliable) rwsem_down_read_failed+0x6c/0x1a0 down_read+0x58/0x60 xfs_log_commit_cil+0x7c/0x600 [xfs] Fixes: commit 5c2c2587 ("mm, dax, pmem: introduce {get|put}_dev_pagemap() for dax-gup") Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reported-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Williams 提交于
get_dev_page() enables paths like get_user_pages() to pin a dynamically mapped pfn-range (devm_memremap_pages()) while the resulting struct page objects are in use. Unlike get_page() it may fail if the device is, or is in the process of being, disabled. While the initial lookup of the range may be an expensive list walk, the result is cached to speed up subsequent lookups which are likely to be in the same mapped range. devm_memremap_pages() now requires a reference counter to be specified at init time. For pmem this means moving request_queue allocation into pmem_alloc() so the existing queue usage counter can track "device pages". ZONE_DEVICE pages always have an elevated count and will never be on an lru reclaim list. That space in 'struct page' can be redirected for other uses, but for safety introduce a poison value that will always trip __list_add() to assert. This allows half of the struct list_head storage to be reclaimed with some assurance to back up the assumption that the page count never goes to zero and a list_add() is never attempted. Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Tested-by: NLogan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Code that does lockless emptiness testing of non-RCU lists is relying on the list-addition code to write the list head's ->next pointer atomically. This commit therefore adds WRITE_ONCE() to list-addition pointer stores that could affect the head's ->next pointer. Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Although the C language allows you to break strings across lines, doing this makes it hard for people to find the Linux kernel code corresponding to a given console message. This commit therefore fixes broken strings throughout RCU's source code. Suggested-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Metcalf 提交于
We were bitten by this at one point and added an additional sanity test for DEBUG_LIST. You can't validly add a list_head to a list where either prev or next is the same as the thing you're adding. Signed-off-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
* Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers just like __list_add does. * Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking at deletion time. Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up, but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something ever does corrupt those lists. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 08 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
For files only using THIS_MODULE and/or EXPORT_SYMBOL, map them onto including export.h -- or if the file isn't even using those, then just delete the include. Fix up any implicit include dependencies that were being masked by module.h along the way. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
With bug.h currently living right in linux/kernel.h there are files that use BUG_ON and friends but are not including the header explicitly. Fix them up so we can remove the presence in kernel.h file. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 29 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
A pending header cleanup will cause this to show up as: lib/average.c:38: error: 'TAINT_WARN' undeclared (first use in this function) lib/list_debug.c:24: error: 'TAINT_WARN' undeclared (first use in this function) and TAINT_WARN comes from include/linux/kernel.h file. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
When list debugging is enabled, we aim to readably show list corruption errors, and the basic list_add/list_del operations end up having extra debugging code in them to do some basic validation of the list entries. However, "list_del_init()" and "list_move[_tail]()" ended up avoiding the debug code due to how they were written. This fixes that. So the _next_ time we have list_move() problems with stale list entries, we'll hopefully have an easier time finding them.. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Baruch Siach 提交于
Use the magic LIST_POISON* values to detect an incorrect use of list_del on a deleted entry. This DEBUG_LIST specific warning is easier to understand than the generic Oops message caused by LIST_POISON dereference. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 7月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects corruption. By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly losing some bug reports. Changing this to a WARN() should mean we at the least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Remove the conditional surrounding the definition of list_add() from list.h since, if you define CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST, the definition you will subsequently pick up from lib/list_debug.c will be absolutely identical, at which point you can remove that redundant definition from list_debug.c as well. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Print the other (hopefully) known good pointer when list_head debugging too, which may yield additional clues. Also fix for 80-columns to win akpm brownie points. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
These two BUG_ON()s are redundant and undesired: we're checking for this condition further on in the function, only better. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 30 9月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Manfred Spraul 提交于
A list_del() debugging check. Has been in -mm for years. Dave moved list_del() out-of-line in the debug case, so this is now suitable for mainline. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-