- 07 3月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This follows the way of handling other flashes and cleans code a bit. As next task we will want to move flash code to ChipCommon driver as: 1) Flash controllers are accesible using ChipCommon registers 2) This code isn't MIPS specific This change prepares bcma for that. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Most of info stored in this struct wasn't really used anywhere as we put all that data in platform data & resource as well. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 06 2月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
It seems 14e4:4365 pattern is too generic as there are two devices: 1) 14e4:4365 1028:0016 with SoftMAC BCM43142 chipset 2) 14e4:4365 14e4:4365 with FullMAC BCM4366 chipset The later one was found in D-Link DIR-885L router and we want to let brcmfmac handle it. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
It's another SoC with 32 GPIOs and simplified watchdog handling. It was tested on D-Link DIR-885L. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
UART is connected to and controlled over ChipCommon core. It doesn't have much to do with MIPS core (where we initialize it currently) except just existing on embedded systemms. There isn't point of such cross-core initialization (and we needed #ifdef anyway) so just handle it in ChipCommon. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
On recent Broadcom chipsets PMU is present as separated core and it can't be accessed using ChipCommon anymore as it fails with e.g.: [ 0.000577] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf1000604 Solve it by using a new (PMU) core pointer set to ChipCommon or PMU depending on the hardware capabilities. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
PMU (Power Management Unit) seems to be a separated piece of hardware, just accessed using ChipCommon core registers. In recent Broadcom chipsets PMU is not bounded to CC but available as separated core. To make code cleaner & easier to review (for a correct R/W access) use clearer names. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Both cores are another exceptions. They are not accessed in a standard way and to they don't need or have wrapping addresses. This fixes bus scanning after finding such core. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Add missing defines and print proper names. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
It's a Macronix 32 MiB flash found on board with BCM47189 SoC. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on container_of(). Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Acked-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 31 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
So far we were using fs_initcall. It was (and still is) needed because struct bus_type has to be registered early. However main bus initialization has to happen later as it requires SPROM which depends on NVRAM which depends on mtd. Solve it by using fs_initcall only for bus_register call and module_init for the rest. It affects bcma only when built-in obviously. This was tested with BCM4706 and BCM5357C0 (BCM47XX), BCM4708A0 (ARCH_BCM_5301X) and BCM43225 (PCIe card with bcma as module). Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 19 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The name .dev in a struct is normally reserved for a struct device that is let us say a superclass to the thing described by the struct. struct gpio_chip stands out by confusingly using a struct device *dev to point to the parent device (such as a platform_device) that represents the hardware. As we want to give gpio_chip:s real devices, this is not working. We need to rename this member to parent. This was done by two coccinelle scripts, I guess it is possible to combine them into one, but I don't know such stuff. They look like this: @@ struct gpio_chip *var; @@ -var->dev +var->parent and: @@ struct gpio_chip var; @@ -var.dev +var.parent and: @@ struct bgpio_chip *var; @@ -var->gc.dev +var->gc.parent Plus a few instances of bgpio that I couldn't figure out how to teach Coccinelle to rewrite. This patch hits all over the place, but I *strongly* prefer this solution to any piecemal approaches that just exercise patch mechanics all over the place. It mainly hits drivers/gpio and drivers/pinctrl which is my own backyard anyway. Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> Acked-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Acked-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: NJacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hauke Mehrtens 提交于
of_default_bus_match_table was not exported earlier, so it could only be accessed by code compiled into the kernel. A new function of_platform_default_populate() was added which uses of_default_bus_match_table and this function is also exported. This way it is possible to create a bus with the content of of_default_bus_match_table and we can remove the hacks from bcma. Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This switches the BCMA GPIO driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP to handle its interrupts instead of rolling its own copy of the irqdomain handling etc. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 11 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hauke Mehrtens 提交于
bus->host_pdev is part of a union so bus->host_pdev != NULL is probably also true for PCIe devices, because there it accesses bus->host_pci. If we access the dev member at the offset defined in struct platform_device in struct pci_dev instead we probably get something else. This patch adds a new function which returns the host dev struct and NULL if we do not have a host dev. When this gets registered on MIPS brcm47xx we do not have a host dev in some situations. This function could also be used in other places. This problem was introduced in this commit: commit cae761b5 Author: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Date: Sun Jun 28 17:17:13 2015 +0200 bcma: populate bus DT subnodes as platform_device-s Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 26 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hauke Mehrtens 提交于
Currently of_default_bus_match_table is not exported so we can only use this feature when bcma is build into the kernel. This patch removes support for child buses when bcma is build as a module as a temporary fix for a build problem introduces in this commit: commit cae761b5 Author: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Date: Sun Jun 28 17:17:13 2015 +0200 bcma: populate bus DT subnodes as platform_device-s Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Fixes: cae761b5 ("bcma: populate bus DT subnodes as platform_device-s") Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Our bus should allow defining children nodes as we may want to specify devices attached to the bus. This is required e.g. to specify NAND or ChipCommon cores and use bus's address and IRQ mappings. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This extension of BCMA_DRIVER_PCI has no reason to depend on BCMA_HOST_PCI. User may just want to have PCI device attached to SoC registered without enabling any extra client mode code. This can be useful when having non-bcma PCI device attached or when using other PCI driver. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 09 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Felix Fietkau 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Felix Fietkau 提交于
On some BCM5301x ARM devices, user space still needs to control some system GPIO pins for which no driver exists. This is a lot easier to do with a predictable GPIO base. Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 01 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
There are two reasons for having this header in the common place: 1) Simplifying drivers that read NVRAM entries. We will be able to safely call bcm47xx_nvram_* functions without #ifdef-s. 2) Getting NVRAM driver out of MIPS arch code. This is needed to support BCM5301X arch which also requires this NVRAM driver. Patch for that will follow once we get is reviewed. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Acked-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: linux-soc@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/8619/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 20 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Some BCM47XX SoC routers have LEDs connected to extra PCIe bcma buses. Handling them in arch code requires predictable GPIO numbers. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 13 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This reverts commit b09f5ec1. Now that we have fully working BCMA_DRIVER_PCI symbol (in can be safely disabled), there is no risk bcma will try to use PCI code without PCI available. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
It isn't required for bcma bus on SoCs, so provide some empty functions and allow disabling it. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This function isn't really related to any bus core. It touches PCI device config registers only, so move it to the (PCI) host file. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 05 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Driver for PCIe core requires PCI to be enabled, however we shouldn't require it for the whole bus. Someone may be not interested in extra PCI devices and what's more there are SoCs without any PCI at all (like BCM5356C0, BCM5357*, BCM47186B0). For more details see Kconfig "help". Please note this patch doesn't allow disabling PCI drivers yet, as it requires more work on calls to bcma_core_pci_* functions. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
These functions are not exported nor used anywhere, so there is no reason to put them in public headers. Also drop unused bcma_chipco_(suspend|resume). Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Chen Gang 提交于
bcma also needs PCI, just like IOMEM and DMA, so let it depend on PCI, or will cause building break for allmodconfig under c6x: CC [M] drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.o drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c: In function 'bcma_core_pcie2_up': drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c:196:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcie_set_readrq' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] err = pcie_set_readrq(dev, pcie2->reqsize); ^ Signed-off-by: NChen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 03 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Just like on BCM47XX arch, BCM5301X also has ChipCommon with IRQ for GPIOs. Now we have interrupts working on BCM5301X we can finally make use of it. This has been successfully tested on 5 different devices (Buffalo, Luxul, Netgear). Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
kbuild found out that commit 804e27de ("bcma: support bringing up bus hosted on PCIe Gen 2") broke the build on m68k: drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c: In function 'bcma_core_pcie2_up': >> drivers/bcma/driver_pcie2.c:196:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcie_set_readrq' [-Werror\ =implicit-function-declaration] err = pcie_set_readrq(dev, pcie2->reqsize); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 02 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
It doesn't operate on PCI core, but PCI host device, so there is no point of passing core related struct. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Bringing PCIe hosted bus up requires operating on host-related core. Since we plan to support PCIe Gen 2 devices we should provide a helper picking the correct one (PCIE or PCIE2). Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 29 1月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This is stil incomplete, so we don't add PCI IDs of new devices yet. Purpose of this patch is to allow testing & adjusting rest of the code. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
There are some PCIe core fixes that need to be applied before accessing SPROM, otherwise reading it may fail. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
This allows us to drop some #ifdef magic (mess). Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Extracting values from it is still unsupported, but at least we'll display some meaningful error now. Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Rafał Miłecki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-