For now, all services use svc_xprt_do_enqueue, but once we add
workqueue-based service support, we'll need to do something different.
Signed-off-by: NShirley Ma <shirley.ma@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NShirley Ma <shirley.ma@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The BKL is completely out of the picture in the lockd and sunrpc code
these days. Update the antiquated comments that refer to it.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

...move the WARN_ON_ONCE inside the following if block since they use
the same condition.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

These were useful when I was tracking down a race condition between
svc_xprt_do_enqueue and svc_get_next_xprt.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Testing has shown that the pool->sp_lock can be a bottleneck on a busy
server. Every time data is received on a socket, the server must take
that lock in order to dequeue a thread from the sp_threads list.

Address this problem by eliminating the sp_threads list (which contains
threads that are currently idle) and replacing it with a RQ_BUSY flag in
svc_rqst. This allows us to walk the sp_all_threads list under the
rcu_read_lock and find a suitable thread for the xprt by doing a
test_and_set_bit.

Note that we do still have a potential atomicity problem however with
this approach.  We don't want svc_xprt_do_enqueue to set the
rqst->rq_xprt pointer unless a test_and_set_bit of RQ_BUSY returned
zero (which indicates that the thread was idle). But, by the time we
check that, the bit could be flipped by a waking thread.

To address this, we acquire a new per-rqst spinlock (rq_lock) and take
that before doing the test_and_set_bit. If that returns false, then we
can set rq_xprt and drop the spinlock. Then, when the thread wakes up,
it must set the bit under the same spinlock and can trust that if it was
already set then the rq_xprt is also properly set.

With this scheme, the case where we have an idle thread no longer needs
to take the highly contended pool->sp_lock at all, and that removes the
bottleneck.

That still leaves one issue: What of the case where we walk the whole
sp_all_threads list and don't find an idle thread? Because the search is
lockess, it's possible for the queueing to race with a thread that is
going to sleep. To address that, we queue the xprt and then search again.

If we find an idle thread at that point, we can't attach the xprt to it
directly since that might race with a different thread waking up and
finding it.  All we can do is wake the idle thread back up and let it
attempt to find the now-queued xprt.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NChris Worley <chris.worley@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

In a later patch, we'll be removing some spinlocking around the socket
and thread queueing code in order to fix some contention problems. At
that point, the stats counters will no longer be protected by the
sp_lock.

Change the counters to atomic_long_t fields, except for the
"sockets_queued" counter which will still be manipulated under a
spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: NChris Worley <chris.worley@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The way that svc_wake_up works is a bit inefficient. It walks all of the
available pools for a service and either wakes up a task in each one or
sets the SP_TASK_PENDING flag in each one.

When svc_wake_up is called, there is no need to wake up more than one
thread to do this work. In practice, only lockd currently uses this
function and it's single threaded anyway. Thus, this just boils down to
doing a wake up of a thread in pool 0 or setting a single flag.

Eliminate the for loop in this function and change it to just operate on
pool 0. Also update the comments that sit above it and get rid of some
code that has been commented out for years now.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

In a later patch, we'll want to be able to handle this flag without
holding the sp_lock. Change this field to an unsigned long flags
field, and declare a new flag in it that can be managed with atomic
bitops.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

In a later patch, we're going to need some atomic bit flags. Since that
field will need to be an unsigned long, we mitigate that space
consumption by migrating some other bitflags to the new field. Start
with the rq_secure flag.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

All it does is indicate whether a xprt has already been deleted from
a list or not, which is unnecessary since we use list_del_init and it's
always set and checked under the sv_lock anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

...just around svc_send, svc_recv and svc_process for now.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

current_task appears to be x86-only, oops.

Let's just delete this check entirely:

Any developer that adds a new user without setting rq_task will get a
crash the first time they test it.  I also don't think there are
normally any important locks held here, and I can't see any other reason
why killing a server thread would bring the whole box down.

So the effort to fail gracefully here looks like overkill.
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Fixes: 983c6844 "SUNRPC: get rid of the request wait queue"
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Just move the transport locking out of the spin lock protected area
altogether.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We should definitely not be exiting svc_get_next_xprt() with the
thread enqueued. Fix this by ensuring that we fall through to
the dequeue.
Also move the test itself outside the spin lock protected section.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We're always _only_ waking up tasks from within the sp_threads list, so
we know that they are enqueued and alive. The rq_wait waitqueue is just
a distraction with extra atomic semantics.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We already determined that there was enough wspace when we
called svc_xprt_enqueue.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Ensure that all calls to svc_xprt_enqueue() except svc_xprt_received()
check the value of XPT_BUSY, before attempting to grab spinlocks etc.
This is to avoid situations such as the following "perf" trace,
which shows heavy contention on the pool spinlock:

    54.15%            nfsd  [kernel.kallsyms]        [k] _raw_spin_lock_bh
                      |
                      --- _raw_spin_lock_bh
                         |
                         |--71.43%-- svc_xprt_enqueue
                         |          |
                         |          |--50.31%-- svc_reserve
                         |          |
                         |          |--31.35%-- svc_xprt_received
                         |          |
                         |          |--18.34%-- svc_tcp_data_ready
...
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

After this we can handle for example getattr of very large ACLs.

Read, readdir, readlink are still special cases with their own limits.

Also we can't handle a new operation starting close to the end of a
page.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

If the accept() call fails, we need to put the module reference.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

An NFS/RDMA client's source port is meaningless for RDMA transports.
The transport layer typically sets the source port value on the
connection to a random ephemeral port.

Currently, NFS server administrators must specify the "insecure"
export option to enable clients to access exports via RDMA.

But this means NFS clients can access such an export via IP using an
ephemeral port, which may not be desirable.

This patch eliminates the need to specify the "insecure" export
option to allow NFS/RDMA clients access to an export.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Mark functions as static in net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c because they are not
used outside this file.

This eliminates the following warning in net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:574:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_alloc_arg’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:615:18: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_get_next_xprt’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:694:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_add_new_temp_xprt’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: NRashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Mark functions as static in net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c because they are not
used outside this file.

This eliminates the following warning in net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:574:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_alloc_arg’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:615:18: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_get_next_xprt’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:694:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘svc_add_new_temp_xprt’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: NRashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Rewrite server shutdown to remove the assumption that there are no
longer any threads running (no longer true, for example, when shutting
down the service in one network namespace while it's still running in
others).

Do that by doing what we'd do in normal circumstances: just CLOSE each
socket, then enqueue it.

Since there may not be threads to handle the resulting queued xprts,
also run a simplified version of the svc_recv() loop run by a server to
clean up any closed xprts afterwards.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Tested-by: NJason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Tested-by: NPaweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>
Acked-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list.  Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.

I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Tested-by: NJason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Tested-by: NPaweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

There is a race in enqueueing thread to a pool and
waking up a thread.
lockd doesn't wake up on reception of lock granted callback
if svc_wake_up() is called before lockd's thread is added
to a pool.
Signed-off-by: NAndriy Skulysh <Andriy_Skulysh@xyratex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace two bounds checking BUG_ON() calls with WARN_ON_ONCE() and resetting
the requested size to RPCSVC_MAXPAGES.
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace BUG_ON() with a WARN_ON_ONCE() and early return.
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Move initialization of newly accepted socket into a helper.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Matter of taste, I suppose, but svc_recv breaks up naturally into:

	allocate pages and setup arg
	dequeue (wait for, if necessary) next socket
	do something with that socket

And I find it easier to read when it doesn't go on for pages and pages.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Note this isn't used outside svc_xprt.c.

May as well move it so we don't need a declaration while we're here.

Also remove an outdated comment.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The only errors returned from xpo_recvfrom have been -EAGAIN and
-EAFNOSUPPORT.  The latter was removed by a previous patch.  That leaves
only -EAGAIN, which is treated just like 0 by the caller (svc_recv).

So, just ditch -EAGAIN and return 0 instead.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

There's some duplicate code here.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Whenever we clear XPT_BUSY we should call svc_xprt_enqueue().  Without
that we may fail to notice any events (such as new connections) that
arrived while XPT_BUSY was set.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Server threads are not running at this point, but svc_age_temp_xprts
still may be, so we need this locking.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The rpc server tries to ensure that there will be room to send a reply
before it receives a request.

It does this by tracking, in xpt_reserved, an upper bound on the total
size of the replies that is has already committed to for the socket.

Currently it is adding in the estimate for a new reply *before* it
checks whether there is space available.  If it finds that there is not
space, it then subtracts the estimate back out.

This may lead the subsequent svc_xprt_enqueue to decide that there is
space after all.

The results is a svc_recv() that will repeatedly return -EAGAIN, causing
server threads to loop without doing any actual work.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Tested-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>