1. 29 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  2. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 31 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 26 3月, 2018 6 次提交
  5. 22 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  6. 16 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 17 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) · bc98a42c
      David Howells 提交于
      Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch:
      
      	@@ expression SB; @@
      	-SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      
      to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-A != (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A == (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-!(sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A && (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A && sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A || (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A || sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) != A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) == A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) || A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) || A
      	)
      
      	@@ expression A, B, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B
      	)
      
      to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	)
      
      to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool)
      work correctly.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      bc98a42c
  8. 30 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 18 4月, 2017 3 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: switch to div64_u64 if with a u64 divisor · 42c61ab6
      Liu Bo 提交于
      This is fixing code pieces where we use div_u64 when passing a u64 divisor.
      
      Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      42c61ab6
    • Q
      btrfs: Wait for in-flight bios before freeing target device for raid56 · ae6529c3
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      When raid56 dev-replace is cancelled by running scrub, we will free
      target device without waiting for in-flight bios, causing the following
      NULL pointer deference or general protection failure.
      
       BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000005e0
       IP: generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610
       CPU: 1 PID: 11676 Comm: kworker/u4:14 Tainted: G  O    4.11.0-rc2 #72
       Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-20170228_101828-anatol 04/01/2014
       Workqueue: btrfs-endio-raid56 btrfs_endio_raid56_helper [btrfs]
       task: ffff88002875b4c0 task.stack: ffffc90001334000
       RIP: 0010:generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610
       Call Trace:
        ? generic_make_request+0xc7/0x360
        generic_make_request+0x24/0x360
        ? generic_make_request+0xc7/0x360
        submit_bio+0x64/0x120
        ? page_in_rbio+0x4d/0x80 [btrfs]
        ? rbio_orig_end_io+0x80/0x80 [btrfs]
        finish_rmw+0x3f4/0x540 [btrfs]
        validate_rbio_for_rmw+0x36/0x40 [btrfs]
        raid_rmw_end_io+0x7a/0x90 [btrfs]
        bio_endio+0x56/0x60
        end_workqueue_fn+0x3c/0x40 [btrfs]
        btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0xef/0x620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_endio_raid56_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
        process_one_work+0x2af/0x720
        ? process_one_work+0x22b/0x720
        worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
        kthread+0x10f/0x150
        ? process_one_work+0x720/0x720
        ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
        ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
       RIP: generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610 RSP: ffffc90001337bb8
      
      In btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(), we will call
      btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() to wait bios before destroying the target
      device when scrub is finished normally.
      
      However when dev-replace is aborted, either due to error or cancelled by
      scrub, we didn't wait for bios, this can lead to use-after-free if there
      are bios holding the target device.
      
      Furthermore, for raid56 scrub, at least 2 places are calling
      btrfs_map_sblock() without protection of bio_counter, leading to the
      problem.
      
      This patch fixes the problem:
      1) Wait for bio_counter before freeing target device when canceling
         replace
      2) When calling btrfs_map_sblock() for raid56, use bio_counter to
         protect the call.
      
      Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ae6529c3
    • D
      btrfs: track exclusive filesystem operation in flags · 171938e5
      David Sterba 提交于
      There are several operations, usually started from ioctls, that cannot
      run concurrently. The status is tracked in
      mutually_exclusive_operation_running as an atomic_t. We can easily track
      the status as one of the per-filesystem flag bits with same
      synchronization guarantees.
      
      The conversion replaces:
      
      * atomic_xchg(..., 1)    ->   test_and_set_bit(FLAG, ...)
      * atomic_set(..., 0)     ->   clear_bit(FLAG, ...)
      Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      171938e5
  10. 28 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 06 12月, 2016 3 次提交
  12. 27 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 26 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 04 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 28 4月, 2016 5 次提交
  18. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • Y
      btrfs: Reset IO error counters before start of device replacing · 7ccefb98
      Yauhen Kharuzhy 提交于
      If device replace entry was found on disk at mounting and its num_write_errors
      stats counter has non-NULL value, then replace operation will never be
      finished and -EIO error will be reported by btrfs_scrub_dev() because
      this counter is never reset.
      
       # mount -o degraded /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       # btrfs replace status /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       Started on 25.Mar 07:28:00, canceled on 25.Mar 07:28:01 at 0.0%, 40 write errs, 0 uncorr. read errs
       # btrfs replace start -B 4 /dev/sdg /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       ERROR: ioctl(DEV_REPLACE_START) failed on "/media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/": Input/output error, no error
      
      Reset num_write_errors and num_uncorrectable_read_errors counters in the
      dev_replace structure before start of replacing.
      Signed-off-by: NYauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      7ccefb98
  19. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace · 73beece9
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,
      
      [ 1226.649039] =========================================================
      [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
      [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
      [ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
      [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}
      
      and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
      
      [ 1226.652955]
      other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
        &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock
      
      [ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
      [ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
      [ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
      [ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
      [ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
      to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
      run to this.
      
      The above lock chain comes from
      btrfs_commit_transaction
        ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
          ...
          ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
            ...
            ->__btrfs_cow_block
               ...
               ->find_free_extent
                  ->cache_block_group
                    ->load_free_space_cache
                      ->btrfs_readpages
                        ->submit_one_bio
                          ...
                          ->__btrfs_map_block
                            ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock
      
      However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
      be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
      by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
      to
      
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700
      
      delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
      to a ABBA deadlock.
      
      To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
      things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.
      
      With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73beece9