Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 3 年多

通知 13
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 05 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 04 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 29 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 01 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 29 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 25 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • D
      ext4: update EOFBLOCKS flag on fallocate properly · a4e5d88b
      由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于 
      EOFBLOCK_FL should be updated if called w/o FALLOCATE_FL_KEEP_SIZE
Currently it happens only if new extent was allocated.

TESTCASE:
fallocate test_file -n -l4096
fallocate test_file -l4096
Last fallocate cmd has updated size, but keept EOFBLOCK_FL set. And
fsck will complain about that.

Also remove ping pong in ext4_fallocate() in case of new extents,
where ext4_ext_map_blocks() clear EOFBLOCKS bit, and later
ext4_falloc_update_inode() restore it again.
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a4e5d88b
  15. 09 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  17. 10 9月, 2011 15 次提交
  19. 04 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: improve handling of conflicting mount options · 56889787
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      If the user explicitly specifies conflicting mount options for
delalloc or dioread_nolock and data=journal, fail the mount, instead
of printing a warning and continuing (since many user's won't look at
dmesg and notice the warning).

Also, print a single warning that data=journal implies that delayed
allocation is not on by default (since it's not supported), and
furthermore that O_DIRECT is not supported.  Improve the text in
Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt so this is clear there as well.

Similarly, if the dioread_nolock mount option is specified when the
file system block size != PAGE_SIZE, fail the mount instead of
printing a warning message and ignoring the mount option.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      56889787
  21. 03 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      ext4: Add new ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers routines · 4e96b2db
      由 Allison Henderson 提交于 
      This patch adds two new routines: ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers
and ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers_no_lock.

The ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers routine is a wrapper
function to ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers_no_lock.
The wrapper function locks the page and passes it to
ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers_no_lock.
Calling functions that already have the page locked can call
ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers_no_lock directly.

The ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers_no_lock function
zeros a specified range in a page, and unmaps the
corresponding buffer heads.  Only block aligned regions of the
page will have their buffer heads unmapped.  Unblock aligned regions
will be mapped if needed so that they can be updated with the
partial zero out.  This function is meant to
be used to update a page and its buffer heads to be zeroed
and unmapped when the corresponding blocks have been released
or will be released.

This routine is used in the following scenarios:
* A hole is punched and the non page aligned regions
  of the head and tail of the hole need to be discarded

* The file is truncated and the partial page beyond EOF needs
  to be discarded

* The end of a hole is in the same page as EOF.  After the
  page is flushed, the partial page beyond EOF needs to be
  discarded.

* A write operation begins or ends inside a hole and the partial
  page appearing before or after the write needs to be discarded

* A write operation extends EOF and the partial page beyond EOF
  needs to be discarded

This function takes a flag EXT4_DISCARD_PARTIAL_PG_ZERO_UNMAPPED
which is used when a write operation begins or ends in a hole.
When the EXT4_DISCARD_PARTIAL_PG_ZERO_UNMAPPED flag is used, only
buffer heads that are already unmapped will have the corresponding
regions of the page zeroed.
Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      4e96b2db
  23. 31 8月, 2011 2 次提交
    • T
      ext2,ext3,ext4: don't inherit APPEND_FL or IMMUTABLE_FL for new inodes · 1cd9f097
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      This doesn't make much sense, and it exposes a bug in the kernel where
attempts to create a new file in an append-only directory using
O_CREAT will fail (but still leave a zero-length file).  This was
discovered when xfstests #79 was generalized so it could run on all
file systems.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc:stable@kernel.org
      1cd9f097
    • J
      ext4: remove i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode to fix lockdep complaining · 8c0bec21
      由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于 
      The i_mutex lock and flush_completed_IO() added by commit 2581fdc8
in ext4_evict_inode() causes lockdep complaining about potential
deadlock in several places.  In most/all of these LOCKDEP complaints
it looks like it's a false positive, since many of the potential
circular locking cases can't take place by the time the
ext4_evict_inode() is called; but since at the very least it may mask
real problems, we need to address this.

This change removes the flush_completed_IO() and i_mutex lock in
ext4_evict_inode().  Instead, we take a different approach to resolve
the software lockup that commit 2581fdc8 intends to fix.  Rather
than having ext4-dio-unwritten thread wait for grabing the i_mutex
lock of an inode, we use mutex_trylock() instead, and simply requeue
the work item if we fail to grab the inode's i_mutex lock.

This should speed up work queue processing in general and also
prevents the following deadlock scenario: During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B.
Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero.  However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue.  As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock.  Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      8c0bec21
  25. 01 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 27 7月, 2011 4 次提交
  29. 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers · 02c24a82
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      02c24a82
  31. 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Speed up FITRIM by recording flags in ext4_group_info · 3d56b8d2
      由 Tao Ma 提交于 
      In ext4, when FITRIM is called every time, we iterate all the
groups and do trim one by one. It is a bit time wasting if the
group has been trimmed and there is no change since the last
trim.

So this patch adds a new flag in ext4_group_info->bb_state to
indicate that the group has been trimmed, and it will be cleared
if some blocks is freed(in release_blocks_on_commit). Another
trim_minlen is added in ext4_sb_info to record the last minlen
we use to trim the volume, so that if the caller provide a small
one, we will go on the trim regardless of the bb_state.

A simple test with my intel x25m ssd:
df -h shows:
/dev/sdb1              40G   21G   17G  56% /mnt/ext4
Block size:               4096

run the FITRIM with the following parameter:
range.start = 0;
range.len = UINT64_MAX;
range.minlen = 1048576;

without the patch:
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m5.505s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m1.224s
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m5.359s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m1.178s
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m5.228s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m1.151s

with the patch:
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m5.625s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m1.269s
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m0.002s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.001s
[root@boyu-tm linux-2.6]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m0.002s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.001s

A big improvement for the 2nd and 3rd run.

Even after I delete some big image files, it is still much
faster than iterating the whole disk.

[root@boyu-tm test]# time ./ftrim /mnt/ext4/a
real	0m1.217s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.196s

Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      3d56b8d2