- 23 2月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... always can be found in nameidata now. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and clean the main loop a bit Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Based on parts from Anatol's patch (the rest is the next commit). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 21 12月, 2012 12 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...as always, rename is the messiest of the bunch. We have to track whether to retry or not via a separate flag since the error handling is already quite complex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...so we can pass in LOOKUP_REVAL. For now, nothing does yet. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Where we can pass in LOOKUP_DIRECTORY or LOOKUP_REVAL. Any other flags passed in here are currently ignored. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The code that relied on that flag was ripped out of btrfs quite some time ago, and never added back. Josef indicated that he was going to take a different approach to the problem in btrfs, and that we could just eliminate this flag. Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When path_init is called with a valid dfd, that code checks permissions on the open directory fd and returns an error if the check fails. This permission check is redundant, however. Both callers of path_init immediately call link_path_walk afterward. The first thing that link_path_walk does for pathnames that do not consist only of slashes is to check for exec permissions at the starting point of the path walk. And this check in path_init() is on the path taken only when *name != '/' && *name != '\0'. In most cases, these checks are very quick, but when the dfd is for a file on a NFS mount with the actimeo=0, each permission check goes out onto the wire. The result is 2 identical ACCESS calls. Given that these codepaths are fairly "hot", I think it makes sense to eliminate the permission check in path_init and simply assume that the caller will eventually check the permissions before proceeding. Reported-by: NDave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 27 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
In commit 800179c9 ("This adds symlink and hardlink restrictions to the Linux VFS"), the new link protections were enabled by default, in the hope that no actual application would care, despite it being technically against legacy UNIX (and documented POSIX) behavior. However, it does turn out to break some applications. It's rare, and it's unfortunate, but it's unacceptable to break existing systems, so we'll have to default to legacy behavior. In particular, it has broken the way AFD distributes files, see http://www.dwd.de/AFD/ along with some legacy scripts. Distributions can end up setting this at initrd time or in system scripts: if you have security problems due to link attacks during your early boot sequence, you have bigger problems than some kernel sysctl setting. Do: echo 1 > /proc/sys/fs/protected_symlinks echo 1 > /proc/sys/fs/protected_hardlinks to re-enable the link protections. Alternatively, we may at some point introduce a kernel config option that sets these kinds of "more secure but not traditional" behavioural options automatically. Reported-by: NNick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com> Reported-by: NHolger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.6 Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 10月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In the common case where a name is much smaller than PATH_MAX, an extra allocation for struct filename is unnecessary. Before allocating a separate one, try to embed the struct filename inside the buffer first. If it turns out that that's not long enough, then fall back to allocating a separate struct filename and redoing the copy. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Keep a pointer to the audit_names "slot" in struct filename. Have all of the audit_inode callers pass a struct filename ponter to audit_inode instead of a string pointer. If the aname field is already populated, then we can skip walking the list altogether and just use it directly. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...and fix up the callers. For do_file_open_root, just declare a struct filename on the stack and fill out the .name field. For do_filp_open, make it also take a struct filename pointer, and fix up its callers to call it appropriately. For filp_open, add a variant that takes a struct filename pointer and turn filp_open into a wrapper around it. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...and make the user_path callers use that variant instead. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, if we call getname() on a userland string more than once, we'll get multiple copies of the string and multiple audit_names records. Add a function that will allow the audit_names code to satisfy getname requests using info from the audit_names list, avoiding a new allocation and audit_names records. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
getname() is intended to copy pathname strings from userspace into a kernel buffer. The result is just a string in kernel space. It would however be quite helpful to be able to attach some ancillary info to the string. For instance, we could attach some audit-related info to reduce the amount of audit-related processing needed. When auditing is enabled, we could also call getname() on the string more than once and not need to recopy it from userspace. This patchset converts the getname()/putname() interfaces to return a struct instead of a string. For now, the struct just tracks the string in kernel space and the original userland pointer for it. Later, we'll add other information to the struct as it becomes convenient. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 10月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
I see no callers in module code. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In order to accomodate retrying path-based syscalls, we need to add a new "type" argument to audit_inode_child. This will tell us whether we're looking for a child entry that represents a create or a delete. If we find a parent, don't automatically assume that we need to create a new entry. Instead, use the information we have to try to find an existing entry first. Update it if one is found and create a new one if not. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, this gets set mostly by happenstance when we call into audit_inode_child. While that might be a little more efficient, it seems wrong. If the syscall ends up failing before audit_inode_child ever gets called, then you'll have an audit_names record that shows the full path but has the parent inode info attached. Fix this by passing in a parent flag when we call audit_inode that gets set to the value of LOOKUP_PARENT. We can then fix up the pathname for the audit entry correctly from the get-go. While we're at it, clean up the no-op macro for audit_inode in the !CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Most of the callers get called with an inode and dentry in the reverse order. The compiler then has to reshuffle the arg registers and/or stack in order to pass them on to audit_inode_child. Reverse those arguments for a micro-optimization. Reported-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
As best I can tell, whenever retval == 0, nd->path.dentry and nd->inode are also non-NULL. Eliminate those checks and the superfluous audit_context check. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
The follow_link() function always initializes its *p argument, or returns an error, but when building with 'gcc -s', the compiler gets confused by the __always_inline attribute to the function and can no longer detect where the cookie was initialized. The solution is to always initialize the pointer from follow_link, even in the error path. When building with -O2, this has zero impact on generated code and adds a single instruction in the error path for a -Os build on ARM. Without this patch, building with gcc-4.6 through gcc-4.8 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE results in: fs/namei.c: In function 'link_path_walk': fs/namei.c:649:24: warning: 'cookie' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] fs/namei.c:1544:9: note: 'cookie' was declared here fs/namei.c: In function 'path_lookupat': fs/namei.c:649:24: warning: 'cookie' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] fs/namei.c:1934:10: note: 'cookie' was declared here fs/namei.c: In function 'path_openat': fs/namei.c:649:24: warning: 'cookie' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] fs/namei.c:2899:9: note: 'cookie' was declared here Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 10 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sasha Levin 提交于
Commit "fs: add link restriction audit reporting" has added auditing of failed attempts to follow symlinks. Unfortunately, the auditing was being done after the struct path structure was released earlier. Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 27 9月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
get_write_access() is needed for nfsd, not binfmt_aout (the latter has no business doing anything of that kind, of course) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 22 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc warnings in fs/namei.c: Warning(fs/namei.c:360): No description found for parameter 'inode' Warning(fs/namei.c:672): No description found for parameter 'nd' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
If ->atomic_open() returns -ENOENT, we take care to return the create error (e.g., EACCES), if any. Do the same when ->atomic_open() returns 1 and provides a negative dentry. This fixes a regression where an unprivileged open O_CREAT fails with ENOENT instead of EACCES, introduced with the new atomic_open code. It is tested by the open/08.t test in the pjd posix test suite, and was observed on top of fuse (backed by ceph-fuse). Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 15 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Pass the umask-ed create mode to may_o_create() instead of the original one. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Tested-by: NRichard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Don't mask S_ISREG off the create mode before passing to ->atomic_open(). Other methods (->create, ->mknod) also get the complete file mode and filesystems expect it. Reported-by: NSteve <steveamigauk@yahoo.co.uk> Reported-by: NRichard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Tested-by: NRichard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-