Update numaq such that it calls numa_add_memblk() and sets
numa_nodes_parsed instead of directly diddling with NUMA states.  The
original get_memcfg_numaq() is renamed to numaq_numa_init() and new
get_memcfg_numaq() is created in numa_32.c.

The shim numa_add_memblk() implementation handles node_start/end_pfn[]
and node_set_online() for nodes with memory.  The new
get_memcfg_numaq() exactly the same with get_memcfg_from_srat() other
than calling the numaq init function.  Things get_memcfgs_numaq() do
are not strictly necessary for numaq but added for consistency and to
help unifying NUMA init handling.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>

The PCI initialization in pci_subsys_init() is a mess. pci_numaq_init,
pci_acpi_init, pci_visws_init and pci_legacy_init are called and each
implementation checks and eventually modifies the global variable
pcibios_scanned.

x86_init functions allow us to do this more elegant. The pci.init
function pointer is preset to pci_legacy_init. numaq, acpi and visws
can modify the pointer in their early setup functions. The functions
return 0 when they did the full initialization including bus scan. A
non zero return value indicates that pci_legacy_init needs to be
called either because the selected function failed or wants the
generic bus scan in pci_legacy_init to happen (e.g. visws).
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07559FB80CFE@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NJacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

The XQUAD stuff is part of the NUMAQ architecture, so move it there.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1265380629-3212-2-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Also move xquad_portio over to where it's allocated.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

This patch is the result of an automatic script that consolidates the
format of all the headers in include/asm-x86/.

The format:

1. No leading underscore. Names with leading underscores are reserved.
2. Pathname components are separated by two underscores. So we can
   distinguish between mm_types.h and mm/types.h.
3. Everything except letters and numbers are turned into single
   underscores.
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>

got this on a test-system:

 calling  numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39
 NUMAQ: disabling TSC
 initcall numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39 returned 0 after 0 msecs

that's because we should not be using arch_initcall to call numaq_tsc_disable.

need to call it in setup_arch before time_init()/tsc_init()
and call it in init_intel() to make the cpu feature bits right.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

... so it could fall back to normal numa and we'd reduce the impact of the
NUMAQ subarch.

NUMAQ depends on GENERICARCH
also decouple genericarch numa from acpi.
also make it fall back to bigsmp if apicid > 8.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

so we could fall back to one node numa.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the
header install make rules
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!