Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 8月, 2014 9 次提交
  3. 06 8月, 2014 3 次提交
    • D
      sparc64: Fix up merge thinko. · 5b6ff9df
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5b6ff9df
    • T
      x86: MCE: Add raw_lock conversion again · ed5c41d3
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Commit ea431643 ("x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs") breaks RT by
the completely unrelated conversion of the cmci_discover_lock to a
regular (non raw) spinlock.  This lock was annotated in commit
59d958d2 ("locking, x86: mce: Annotate cmci_discover_lock as raw")
with a proper explanation why.

The argument for converting the lock back to a regular spinlock was:

 - it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
   disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.

Which is complete nonsense.  The raw_spinlock is disabling preemption in
the same way as a regular spinlock.  In mainline spinlock maps to
raw_spinlock, in RT spinlock becomes a "sleeping" lock.

raw_spinlock has on RT exactly the same semantics as in mainline.  And
because this lock is taken in non preemptible context it must be raw on
RT.

Undo the locking brainfart.
Reported-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ed5c41d3
    • T
      random: introduce getrandom(2) system call · c6e9d6f3
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The getrandom(2) system call was requested by the LibreSSL Portable
developers.  It is analoguous to the getentropy(2) system call in
OpenBSD.

The rationale of this system call is to provide resiliance against
file descriptor exhaustion attacks, where the attacker consumes all
available file descriptors, forcing the use of the fallback code where
/dev/[u]random is not available.  Since the fallback code is often not
well-tested, it is better to eliminate this potential failure mode
entirely.

The other feature provided by this new system call is the ability to
request randomness from the /dev/urandom entropy pool, but to block
until at least 128 bits of entropy has been accumulated in the
/dev/urandom entropy pool.  Historically, the emphasis in the
/dev/urandom development has been to ensure that urandom pool is
initialized as quickly as possible after system boot, and preferably
before the init scripts start execution.

This is because changing /dev/urandom reads to block represents an
interface change that could potentially break userspace which is not
acceptable.  In practice, on most x86 desktop and server systems, in
general the entropy pool can be initialized before it is needed (and
in modern kernels, we will printk a warning message if not).  However,
on an embedded system, this may not be the case.  And so with this new
interface, we can provide the functionality of blocking until the
urandom pool has been initialized.  Any userspace program which uses
this new functionality must take care to assure that if it is used
during the boot process, that it will not cause the init scripts or
other portions of the system startup to hang indefinitely.

SYNOPSIS
	#include <linux/random.h>

	int getrandom(void *buf, size_t buflen, unsigned int flags);

DESCRIPTION
	The system call getrandom() fills the buffer pointed to by buf
	with up to buflen random bytes which can be used to seed user
	space random number generators (i.e., DRBG's) or for other
	cryptographic uses.  It should not be used for Monte Carlo
	simulations or other programs/algorithms which are doing
	probabilistic sampling.

	If the GRND_RANDOM flags bit is set, then draw from the
	/dev/random pool instead of the /dev/urandom pool.  The
	/dev/random pool is limited based on the entropy that can be
	obtained from environmental noise, so if there is insufficient
	entropy, the requested number of bytes may not be returned.
	If there is no entropy available at all, getrandom(2) will
	either block, or return an error with errno set to EAGAIN if
	the GRND_NONBLOCK bit is set in flags.

	If the GRND_RANDOM bit is not set, then the /dev/urandom pool
	will be used.  Unlike using read(2) to fetch data from
	/dev/urandom, if the urandom pool has not been sufficiently
	initialized, getrandom(2) will block (or return -1 with the
	errno set to EAGAIN if the GRND_NONBLOCK bit is set in flags).

	The getentropy(2) system call in OpenBSD can be emulated using
	the following function:

            int getentropy(void *buf, size_t buflen)
            {
                    int     ret;

                    if (buflen > 256)
                            goto failure;
                    ret = getrandom(buf, buflen, 0);
                    if (ret < 0)
                            return ret;
                    if (ret == buflen)
                            return 0;
            failure:
                    errno = EIO;
                    return -1;
            }

RETURN VALUE
       On success, the number of bytes that was filled in the buf is
       returned.  This may not be all the bytes requested by the
       caller via buflen if insufficient entropy was present in the
       /dev/random pool, or if the system call was interrupted by a
       signal.

       On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.

ERRORS
	EINVAL		An invalid flag was passed to getrandom(2)

	EFAULT		buf is outside the accessible address space.

	EAGAIN		The requested entropy was not available, and
			getentropy(2) would have blocked if the
			GRND_NONBLOCK flag was not set.

	EINTR		While blocked waiting for entropy, the call was
			interrupted by a signal handler; see the description
			of how interrupted read(2) calls on "slow" devices
			are handled with and without the SA_RESTART flag
			in the signal(7) man page.

NOTES
	For small requests (buflen <= 256) getrandom(2) will not
	return EINTR when reading from the urandom pool once the
	entropy pool has been initialized, and it will return all of
	the bytes that have been requested.  This is the recommended
	way to use getrandom(2), and is designed for compatibility
	with OpenBSD's getentropy() system call.

	However, if you are using GRND_RANDOM, then getrandom(2) may
	block until the entropy accounting determines that sufficient
	environmental noise has been gathered such that getrandom(2)
	will be operating as a NRBG instead of a DRBG for those people
	who are working in the NIST SP 800-90 regime.  Since it may
	block for a long time, these guarantees do *not* apply.  The
	user may want to interrupt a hanging process using a signal,
	so blocking until all of the requested bytes are returned
	would be unfriendly.

	For this reason, the user of getrandom(2) MUST always check
	the return value, in case it returns some error, or if fewer
	bytes than requested was returned.  In the case of
	!GRND_RANDOM and small request, the latter should never
	happen, but the careful userspace code (and all crypto code
	should be careful) should check for this anyway!

	Finally, unless you are doing long-term key generation (and
	perhaps not even then), you probably shouldn't be using
	GRND_RANDOM.  The cryptographic algorithms used for
	/dev/urandom are quite conservative, and so should be
	sufficient for all purposes.  The disadvantage of GRND_RANDOM
	is that it can block, and the increased complexity required to
	deal with partially fulfilled getrandom(2) requests.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
      c6e9d6f3
  5. 05 8月, 2014 5 次提交
    • D
      sparc: Add "install" target · c78f77e2
      由 David L Stevens 提交于 
      This patches adds an "install" target to install kernel builds for SPARC,
modeled after the i386 script.
Signed-off-by: NDavid L Stevens <david.stevens@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c78f77e2
    • A
      arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c: drop stray break operator · 093758e3
      由 Andrey Utkin 提交于 
      This commit is a guesswork, but it seems to make sense to drop this
break, as otherwise the following line is never executed and becomes
dead code. And that following line actually saves the result of
local calculation by the pointer given in function argument. So the
proposed change makes sense if this code in the whole makes sense (but I
am unable to analyze it in the whole).

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81641Reported-by: NDavid Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      093758e3
    • S
      sparc64: ldc_connect() should not return EINVAL when handshake is in progress. · 4ec1b010
      由 Sowmini Varadhan 提交于 
      The LDC handshake could have been asynchronously triggered
after ldc_bind() enables the ldc_rx() receive interrupt-handler
(and thus intercepts incoming control packets)
and before vio_port_up() calls ldc_connect(). If that is the case,
ldc_connect() should return 0 and let the state-machine
progress.
Signed-off-by: NSowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NKarl Volz <karl.volz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4ec1b010
    • D
      sparc64: Guard against flushing openfirmware mappings. · 4ca9a237
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Based almost entirely upon a patch by Christopher Alexander Tobias
Schulze.

In commit db64fe02 ("mm: rewrite vmap
layer") lazy VMAP tlb flushing was added to the vmalloc layer.  This
causes problems on sparc64.

Sparc64 has two VMAP mapped regions and they are not contiguous with
eachother.  First we have the malloc mapping area, then another
unrelated region, then the vmalloc region.

This "another unrelated region" is where the firmware is mapped.

If the lazy TLB flushing logic in the vmalloc code triggers after
we've had both a module unload and a vfree or similar, it will pass an
address range that goes from somewhere inside the malloc region to
somewhere inside the vmalloc region, and thus covering the
openfirmware area entirely.

The sparc64 kernel learns about openfirmware's dynamic mappings in
this region early in the boot, and then services TLB misses in this
area.  But openfirmware has some locked TLB entries which are not
mentioned in those dynamic mappings and we should thus not disturb
them.

These huge lazy TLB flush ranges causes those openfirmware locked TLB
entries to be removed, resulting in all kinds of problems including
hard hangs and crashes during reboot/reset.

Besides causing problems like this, such huge TLB flush ranges are
also incredibly inefficient.  A plea has been made with the author of
the VMAP lazy TLB flushing code, but for now we'll put a safety guard
into our flush_tlb_kernel_range() implementation.

Since the implementation has become non-trivial, stop defining it as a
macro and instead make it a function in a C source file.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4ca9a237
    • D
      sparc64: Do not insert non-valid PTEs into the TSB hash table. · 18f38132
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      The assumption was that update_mmu_cache() (and the equivalent for PMDs) would
only be called when the PTE being installed will be accessible by the user.

This is not true for code paths originating from remove_migration_pte().

There are dire consequences for placing a non-valid PTE into the TSB.  The TLB
miss frramework assumes thatwhen a TSB entry matches we can just load it into
the TLB and return from the TLB miss trap.

So if a non-valid PTE is in there, we will deadlock taking the TLB miss over
and over, never satisfying the miss.

Just exit early from update_mmu_cache() and friends in this situation.

Based upon a report and patch from Christopher Alexander Tobias Schulze.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      18f38132
  7. 03 8月, 2014 3 次提交
    • D
      x86/pmc_atom: Silence shift wrapping warnings in pmc_sleep_tmr_show() · 4c51cb00
      由 Dan Carpenter 提交于 
      I don't know if we really need 64 bits here but these variables are
declared as u64 and it can't hurt to cast this so we prevent any shift
wrapping.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NAubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140801082715.GE28869@mwandaSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      4c51cb00
    • A
      net: filter: split 'struct sk_filter' into socket and bpf parts · 7ae457c1
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      clean up names related to socket filtering and bpf in the following way:
- everything that deals with sockets keeps 'sk_*' prefix
- everything that is pure BPF is changed to 'bpf_*' prefix

split 'struct sk_filter' into
struct sk_filter {
	atomic_t        refcnt;
	struct rcu_head rcu;
	struct bpf_prog *prog;
};
and
struct bpf_prog {
        u32                     jited:1,
                                len:31;
        struct sock_fprog_kern  *orig_prog;
        unsigned int            (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
                                            const struct bpf_insn *filter);
        union {
                struct sock_filter      insns[0];
                struct bpf_insn         insnsi[0];
                struct work_struct      work;
        };
};
so that 'struct bpf_prog' can be used independent of sockets and cleans up
'unattached' bpf use cases

split SK_RUN_FILTER macro into:
    SK_RUN_FILTER to be used with 'struct sk_filter *' and
    BPF_PROG_RUN to be used with 'struct bpf_prog *'

__sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *) gains
__bpf_prog_release(struct bpf_prog *) helper function

also perform related renames for the functions that work
with 'struct bpf_prog *', since they're on the same lines:

sk_filter_size -> bpf_prog_size
sk_filter_select_runtime -> bpf_prog_select_runtime
sk_filter_free -> bpf_prog_free
sk_unattached_filter_create -> bpf_prog_create
sk_unattached_filter_destroy -> bpf_prog_destroy
sk_store_orig_filter -> bpf_prog_store_orig_filter
sk_release_orig_filter -> bpf_release_orig_filter
__sk_migrate_filter -> bpf_migrate_filter
__sk_prepare_filter -> bpf_prepare_filter

API for attaching classic BPF to a socket stays the same:
sk_attach_filter(prog, struct sock *)/sk_detach_filter(struct sock *)
and SK_RUN_FILTER(struct sk_filter *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by sockets, tun, af_packet

API for 'unattached' BPF programs becomes:
bpf_prog_create(struct bpf_prog **)/bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *)
and BPF_PROG_RUN(struct bpf_prog *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by isdn, ppp, team, seccomp, ptp, xt_bpf, cls_bpf, test_bpf
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7ae457c1
    • A
      net: filter: rename sk_convert_filter() -> bpf_convert_filter() · 8fb575ca
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      to indicate that this function is converting classic BPF into eBPF
and not related to sockets
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8fb575ca
  9. 02 8月, 2014 9 次提交
  11. 01 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  13. 31 7月, 2014 9 次提交
    • D
      x86/mm: Set TLB flush tunable to sane value (33) · a5102476
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      This has been run through Intel's LKP tests across a wide range
of modern sytems and workloads and it wasn't shown to make a
measurable performance difference positive or negative.

Now that we have some shiny new tracepoints, we can actually
figure out what the heck is going on.

During a kernel compile, 60% of the flush_tlb_mm_range() calls
are for a single page.  It breaks down like this:

 size   percent  percent<=
  V        V        V
GLOBAL:   2.20%   2.20% avg cycles:  2283
     1:  56.92%  59.12% avg cycles:  1276
     2:  13.78%  72.90% avg cycles:  1505
     3:   8.26%  81.16% avg cycles:  1880
     4:   7.41%  88.58% avg cycles:  2447
     5:   1.73%  90.31% avg cycles:  2358
     6:   1.32%  91.63% avg cycles:  2563
     7:   1.14%  92.77% avg cycles:  2862
     8:   0.62%  93.39% avg cycles:  3542
     9:   0.08%  93.47% avg cycles:  3289
    10:   0.43%  93.90% avg cycles:  3570
    11:   0.20%  94.10% avg cycles:  3767
    12:   0.08%  94.18% avg cycles:  3996
    13:   0.03%  94.20% avg cycles:  4077
    14:   0.02%  94.23% avg cycles:  4836
    15:   0.04%  94.26% avg cycles:  5699
    16:   0.06%  94.32% avg cycles:  5041
    17:   0.57%  94.89% avg cycles:  5473
    18:   0.02%  94.91% avg cycles:  5396
    19:   0.03%  94.95% avg cycles:  5296
    20:   0.02%  94.96% avg cycles:  6749
    21:   0.18%  95.14% avg cycles:  6225
    22:   0.01%  95.15% avg cycles:  6393
    23:   0.01%  95.16% avg cycles:  6861
    24:   0.12%  95.28% avg cycles:  6912
    25:   0.05%  95.32% avg cycles:  7190
    26:   0.01%  95.33% avg cycles:  7793
    27:   0.01%  95.34% avg cycles:  7833
    28:   0.01%  95.35% avg cycles:  8253
    29:   0.08%  95.42% avg cycles:  8024
    30:   0.03%  95.45% avg cycles:  9670
    31:   0.01%  95.46% avg cycles:  8949
    32:   0.01%  95.46% avg cycles:  9350
    33:   3.11%  98.57% avg cycles:  8534
    34:   0.02%  98.60% avg cycles: 10977
    35:   0.02%  98.62% avg cycles: 11400

We get in to dimishing returns pretty quickly.  On pre-IvyBridge
CPUs, we used to set the limit at 8 pages, and it was set at 128
on IvyBrige.  That 128 number looks pretty silly considering that
less than 0.5% of the flushes are that large.

The previous code tried to size this number based on the size of
the TLB.  Good idea, but it's error-prone, needs maintenance
(which it didn't get up to now), and probably would not matter in
practice much.

Settting it to 33 means that we cover the mallopt
M_TRIM_THRESHOLD, which is the most universally common size to do
flushes.

That's the short version.  Here's the long one for why I chose 33:

1. These numbers have a constant bias in the timestamps from the
   tracing.  Probably counts for a couple hundred cycles in each of
   these tests, but it should be fairly _even_ across all of them.
   The smallest delta between the tracepoints I have ever seen is
   335 cycles.  This is one reason the cycles/page cost goes down in
   general as the flushes get larger.  The true cost is nearer to
   100 cycles.
2. A full flush is more expensive than a single invlpg, but not
   by much (single percentages).
3. A dtlb miss is 17.1ns (~45 cycles) and a itlb miss is 13.0ns
   (~34 cycles).  At those rates, refilling the 512-entry dTLB takes
   22,000 cycles.
4. 22,000 cycles is approximately the equivalent of doing 85
   invlpg operations.  But, the odds are that the TLB can
   actually be filled up faster than that because TLB misses that
   are close in time also tend to leverage the same caches.
6. ~98% of flushes are <=33 pages.  There are a lot of flushes of
   33 pages, probably because libc's M_TRIM_THRESHOLD is set to
   128k (32 pages)
7. I've found no consistent data to support changing the IvyBridge
   vs. SandyBridge tunable by a factor of 16

I used the performance counters on this hardware (IvyBridge i5-3320M)
to figure out the tlb miss costs:

ocperf.py stat -e dtlb_load_misses.walk_duration,dtlb_load_misses.walk_completed,dtlb_store_misses.walk_duration,dtlb_store_misses.walk_completed,itlb_misses.walk_duration,itlb_misses.walk_completed,itlb.itlb_flush

     7,720,030,970      dtlb_load_misses_walk_duration                                    [57.13%]
       169,856,353      dtlb_load_misses_walk_completed                                    [57.15%]
       708,832,859      dtlb_store_misses_walk_duration                                    [57.17%]
        19,346,823      dtlb_store_misses_walk_completed                                    [57.17%]
     2,779,687,402      itlb_misses_walk_duration                                    [57.15%]
        82,241,148      itlb_misses_walk_completed                                    [57.13%]
           770,717      itlb_itlb_flush                                              [57.11%]

Show that a dtlb miss is 17.1ns (~45 cycles) and a itlb miss is 13.0ns
(~34 cycles).  At those rates, refilling the 512-entry dTLB takes
22,000 cycles.  On a SandyBridge system with more cores and larger
caches, those are dtlb=13.4ns and itlb=9.5ns.

cat perf.stat.txt | perl -pe 's/,//g'
	| awk '/itlb_misses_walk_duration/ { icyc+=$1 }
		/itlb_misses_walk_completed/ { imiss+=$1 }
		/dtlb_.*_walk_duration/ { dcyc+=$1 }
		/dtlb_.*.*completed/ { dmiss+=$1 }
		END {print "itlb cyc/miss: ", icyc/imiss, " dtlb cyc/miss: ", dcyc/dmiss, "   -----    ", icyc,imiss, dcyc,dmiss }

On Westmere CPUs, the counters to use are: itlb_flush,itlb_misses.walk_cycles,itlb_misses.any,dtlb_misses.walk_cycles,dtlb_misses.any

The assumptions that this code went in under:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/119 say that a flush and a refill are
about 100ns.  Being generous, that is over by a factor of 6 on the
refill side, although it is fairly close on the cost of an invlpg.
An increase of a single invlpg operation seems to lengthen the flush
range operation by about 200 cycles.  Here is one example of the data
collected for flushing 10 and 11 pages (full data are below):

    10:   0.43%  93.90% avg cycles:  3570 cycles/page:  357 samples: 4714
    11:   0.20%  94.10% avg cycles:  3767 cycles/page:  342 samples: 2145

How to generate this table:

	echo 10000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
	echo x86-tsc > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_clock
	echo 'reason != 0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/filter
	echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/enable

Pipe the trace output in to this script:

	http://sr71.net/~dave/intel/201402-tlb/trace-time-diff-process.pl.txt

Note that these data were gathered with the invlpg threshold set to
150 pages.  Only data points with >=50 of samples were printed:

Flush    % of     %<=
in       flush    this
pages      es     size
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -1:   2.20%   2.20% avg cycles:  2283 cycles/page: xxxx samples: 23960
     1:  56.92%  59.12% avg cycles:  1276 cycles/page: 1276 samples: 620895
     2:  13.78%  72.90% avg cycles:  1505 cycles/page:  752 samples: 150335
     3:   8.26%  81.16% avg cycles:  1880 cycles/page:  626 samples: 90131
     4:   7.41%  88.58% avg cycles:  2447 cycles/page:  611 samples: 80877
     5:   1.73%  90.31% avg cycles:  2358 cycles/page:  471 samples: 18885
     6:   1.32%  91.63% avg cycles:  2563 cycles/page:  427 samples: 14397
     7:   1.14%  92.77% avg cycles:  2862 cycles/page:  408 samples: 12441
     8:   0.62%  93.39% avg cycles:  3542 cycles/page:  442 samples: 6721
     9:   0.08%  93.47% avg cycles:  3289 cycles/page:  365 samples: 917
    10:   0.43%  93.90% avg cycles:  3570 cycles/page:  357 samples: 4714
    11:   0.20%  94.10% avg cycles:  3767 cycles/page:  342 samples: 2145
    12:   0.08%  94.18% avg cycles:  3996 cycles/page:  333 samples: 864
    13:   0.03%  94.20% avg cycles:  4077 cycles/page:  313 samples: 289
    14:   0.02%  94.23% avg cycles:  4836 cycles/page:  345 samples: 236
    15:   0.04%  94.26% avg cycles:  5699 cycles/page:  379 samples: 390
    16:   0.06%  94.32% avg cycles:  5041 cycles/page:  315 samples: 643
    17:   0.57%  94.89% avg cycles:  5473 cycles/page:  321 samples: 6229
    18:   0.02%  94.91% avg cycles:  5396 cycles/page:  299 samples: 224
    19:   0.03%  94.95% avg cycles:  5296 cycles/page:  278 samples: 367
    20:   0.02%  94.96% avg cycles:  6749 cycles/page:  337 samples: 185
    21:   0.18%  95.14% avg cycles:  6225 cycles/page:  296 samples: 1964
    22:   0.01%  95.15% avg cycles:  6393 cycles/page:  290 samples: 83
    23:   0.01%  95.16% avg cycles:  6861 cycles/page:  298 samples: 61
    24:   0.12%  95.28% avg cycles:  6912 cycles/page:  288 samples: 1307
    25:   0.05%  95.32% avg cycles:  7190 cycles/page:  287 samples: 533
    26:   0.01%  95.33% avg cycles:  7793 cycles/page:  299 samples: 94
    27:   0.01%  95.34% avg cycles:  7833 cycles/page:  290 samples: 66
    28:   0.01%  95.35% avg cycles:  8253 cycles/page:  294 samples: 73
    29:   0.08%  95.42% avg cycles:  8024 cycles/page:  276 samples: 846
    30:   0.03%  95.45% avg cycles:  9670 cycles/page:  322 samples: 296
    31:   0.01%  95.46% avg cycles:  8949 cycles/page:  288 samples: 79
    32:   0.01%  95.46% avg cycles:  9350 cycles/page:  292 samples: 60
    33:   3.11%  98.57% avg cycles:  8534 cycles/page:  258 samples: 33936
    34:   0.02%  98.60% avg cycles: 10977 cycles/page:  322 samples: 268
    35:   0.02%  98.62% avg cycles: 11400 cycles/page:  325 samples: 177
    36:   0.01%  98.63% avg cycles: 11504 cycles/page:  319 samples: 161
    37:   0.02%  98.65% avg cycles: 11596 cycles/page:  313 samples: 182
    38:   0.02%  98.66% avg cycles: 11850 cycles/page:  311 samples: 195
    39:   0.01%  98.68% avg cycles: 12158 cycles/page:  311 samples: 128
    40:   0.01%  98.68% avg cycles: 11626 cycles/page:  290 samples: 78
    41:   0.04%  98.73% avg cycles: 11435 cycles/page:  278 samples: 477
    42:   0.01%  98.73% avg cycles: 12571 cycles/page:  299 samples: 74
    43:   0.01%  98.74% avg cycles: 12562 cycles/page:  292 samples: 78
    44:   0.01%  98.75% avg cycles: 12991 cycles/page:  295 samples: 108
    45:   0.01%  98.76% avg cycles: 13169 cycles/page:  292 samples: 78
    46:   0.02%  98.78% avg cycles: 12891 cycles/page:  280 samples: 261
    47:   0.01%  98.79% avg cycles: 13099 cycles/page:  278 samples: 67
    48:   0.01%  98.80% avg cycles: 13851 cycles/page:  288 samples: 77
    49:   0.01%  98.80% avg cycles: 13749 cycles/page:  280 samples: 66
    50:   0.01%  98.81% avg cycles: 13949 cycles/page:  278 samples: 73
    52:   0.00%  98.82% avg cycles: 14243 cycles/page:  273 samples: 52
    54:   0.01%  98.83% avg cycles: 15312 cycles/page:  283 samples: 87
    55:   0.01%  98.84% avg cycles: 15197 cycles/page:  276 samples: 109
    56:   0.02%  98.86% avg cycles: 15234 cycles/page:  272 samples: 208
    57:   0.00%  98.86% avg cycles: 14888 cycles/page:  261 samples: 53
    58:   0.01%  98.87% avg cycles: 15037 cycles/page:  259 samples: 59
    59:   0.01%  98.87% avg cycles: 15752 cycles/page:  266 samples: 63
    62:   0.00%  98.89% avg cycles: 16222 cycles/page:  261 samples: 54
    64:   0.02%  98.91% avg cycles: 17179 cycles/page:  268 samples: 248
    65:   0.12%  99.03% avg cycles: 18762 cycles/page:  288 samples: 1324
    85:   0.00%  99.10% avg cycles: 21649 cycles/page:  254 samples: 50
   127:   0.01%  99.18% avg cycles: 32397 cycles/page:  255 samples: 75
   128:   0.13%  99.31% avg cycles: 31711 cycles/page:  247 samples: 1466
   129:   0.18%  99.49% avg cycles: 33017 cycles/page:  255 samples: 1927
   181:   0.33%  99.84% avg cycles:  2489 cycles/page:   13 samples: 3547
   256:   0.05%  99.91% avg cycles:  2305 cycles/page:    9 samples: 550
   512:   0.03%  99.95% avg cycles:  2133 cycles/page:    4 samples: 304
  1512:   0.01%  99.99% avg cycles:  3038 cycles/page:    2 samples: 65

Here are the tlb counters during a 10-second slice of a kernel compile
for a SandyBridge system.  It's better than IvyBridge, but probably
due to the larger caches since this was one of the 'X' extreme parts.

    10,873,007,282      dtlb_load_misses_walk_duration
       250,711,333      dtlb_load_misses_walk_completed
     1,212,395,865      dtlb_store_misses_walk_duration
        31,615,772      dtlb_store_misses_walk_completed
     5,091,010,274      itlb_misses_walk_duration
       163,193,511      itlb_misses_walk_completed
         1,321,980      itlb_itlb_flush

      10.008045158 seconds time elapsed

# cat perf.stat.1392743721.txt | perl -pe 's/,//g' | awk '/itlb_misses_walk_duration/ { icyc+=$1 } /itlb_misses_walk_completed/ { imiss+=$1 } /dtlb_.*_walk_duration/ { dcyc+=$1 } /dtlb_.*.*completed/ { dmiss+=$1 } END {print "itlb cyc/miss: ", icyc/imiss/3.3, " dtlb cyc/miss: ", dcyc/dmiss/3.3, "   -----    ", icyc,imiss, dcyc,dmiss }'
itlb ns/miss:  9.45338  dtlb ns/miss:  12.9716
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154103.10C1115E@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      a5102476
    • D
      x86/mm: New tunable for single vs full TLB flush · 2d040a1c
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      Most of the logic here is in the documentation file.  Please take
a look at it.

I know we've come full-circle here back to a tunable, but this
new one is *WAY* simpler.  I challenge anyone to describe in one
sentence how the old one worked.  Here's the way the new one
works:

	If we are flushing more pages than the ceiling, we use
	the full flush, otherwise we use per-page flushes.
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154101.12B52CAF@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      2d040a1c
    • D
      x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes · d17d8f9d
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes
are being attempted.  Right now, we can try to use the vm
counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the
hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually
_requested_.

This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we
might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones
that we have very little control over (the ones at context
switch).
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      d17d8f9d
    • D
      x86/mm: Unify remote INVLPG code · a23421f1
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      There are currently three paths through the remote flush code:

1. full invalidation
2. single page invalidation using invlpg
3. ranged invalidation using invlpg

This takes 2 and 3 and combines them in to a single path by
making the single-page one just be the start and end be start
plus a single page.  This makes placement of our tracepoint easier.
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154058.E0F90408@viggo.jf.intel.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      a23421f1
    • D
      x86/mm: Fix missed global TLB flush stat · 9dfa6dee
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      If we take the

	if (end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL || vmflag & VM_HUGETLB) {
		local_flush_tlb();
		goto out;
	}

path out of flush_tlb_mm_range(), we will have flushed the tlb,
but not incremented NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ALL.  This unifies the
way out of the function so that we always take a single path when
doing a full tlb flush.
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154056.FF763B76@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      9dfa6dee
    • D
      x86/mm: Rip out complicated, out-of-date, buggy TLB flushing · e9f4e0a9
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      I think the flush_tlb_mm_range() code that tries to tune the
flush sizes based on the CPU needs to get ripped out for
several reasons:

1. It is obviously buggy.  It uses mm->total_vm to judge the
   task's footprint in the TLB.  It should certainly be using
   some measure of RSS, *NOT* ->total_vm since only resident
   memory can populate the TLB.
2. Haswell, and several other CPUs are missing from the
   intel_tlb_flushall_shift_set() function.  Thus, it has been
   demonstrated to bitrot quickly in practice.
3. It is plain wrong in my vm:
	[    0.037444] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 0, 2MB 0, 4MB 0
	[    0.037444] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 0, 2MB 0, 4MB 0
	[    0.037444] tlb_flushall_shift: 6
   Which leads to it to never use invlpg.
4. The assumptions about TLB refill costs are wrong:
	http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337782555-8088-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
    (more on this in later patches)
5. I can not reproduce the original data: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/59
   I believe the sample times were too short.  Running the
   benchmark in a loop yields times that vary quite a bit.

Note that this leaves us with a static ceiling of 1 page.  This
is a conservative, dumb setting, and will be revised in a later
patch.

This also removes the code which attempts to predict whether we
are flushing data or instructions.  We expect instruction flushes
to be relatively rare and not worth tuning for explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154055.ABC88E89@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      e9f4e0a9
    • D
      x86/mm: Clean up the TLB flushing code · 4995ab9c
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      The

	if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)

line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels.  This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions.  It also gives us a unified
exit point for each path through this function.  We need this in
a minute for our tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154054.44F1CDDC@viggo.jf.intel.comAcked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      4995ab9c
    • M
      x86/kvm: Resolve shadow warnings in macro expansion · 42cbc04f
      由 Mark D Rustad 提交于 
      Resolve shadow warnings that appear in W=2 builds. Instead of
using ret to hold the return pointer, save the length in a new
variable saved_len and compute the pointer on exit. This also
resolves a very technical error, in that ret was declared as
a const char *, when it really was a char * const.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      42cbc04f
    • W
      Revert "arm64: dmi: Add SMBIOS/DMI support" · 94156675
      由 Will Deacon 提交于 
      This reverts commit a28e3f4b.

Ard and Yi Li report that this patch is broken by design, so revert it
and let them sort it out for 3.18 instead.
Reported-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      94156675