Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 27 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • V
      inotify: clean up inotify_read and fix locking problems · 3632dee2
      由 Vegard Nossum 提交于 
      If userspace supplies an invalid pointer to a read() of an inotify
instance, the inotify device's event list mutex is unlocked twice.
This causes an unbalance which effectively leaves the data structure
unprotected, and we can trigger oopses by accessing the inotify
instance from different tasks concurrently.

The best fix (contributed largely by Linus) is a total rewrite
of the function in question:

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The thing to notice is that:
>
>  - locking is done in just one place, and there is no question about it
>   not having an unlock.
>
>  - that whole double-while(1)-loop thing is gone.
>
>  - use multiple functions to make nesting and error handling sane
>
>  - do error testing after doing the things you always need to do, ie do
>   this:
>
>        mutex_lock(..)
>        ret = function_call();
>        mutex_unlock(..)
>
>        .. test ret here ..
>
>   instead of doing conditional exits with unlocking or freeing.
>
> So if the code is written in this way, it may still be buggy, but at least
> it's not buggy because of subtle "forgot to unlock" or "forgot to free"
> issues.
>
> This _always_ unlocks if it locked, and it always frees if it got a
> non-error kevent.

Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3632dee2
  5. 26 1月, 2009 5 次提交
  7. 22 1月, 2009 33 次提交