“15cea99306ae14ce5f7c3d3989bcc17202e2b0be”上不存在“drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c”
- 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Salter 提交于
commit a610d6e6: pull clearing RESTORE_SIGMASK into block_sigmask() left behind a compiler warning: arch/c6x/kernel/signal.c:252:6: warning: unused variable 'ret' This patch cleans up the warning by removing the unused variable. Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Does block_sigmask() + tracehook_signal_handler(); called when sigframe has been successfully built. All architectures converted to it; block_sigmask() itself is gone now (merged into this one). I'm still not too happy with the signature, but that's a separate story (IMO we need a structure that would contain signal number + siginfo + k_sigaction, so that get_signal_to_deliver() would fill one, signal_delivered(), handle_signal() and probably setup...frame() - take one). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
Only 3 out of 63 do not. Renamed the current variant to __set_current_blocked(), added set_current_blocked() that will exclude unblockable signals, switched open-coded instances to it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
replace boilerplate "should we use ->saved_sigmask or ->blocked?" with calls of obvious inlined helper... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> -
由 Al Viro 提交于
first fruits of ..._restore_sigmask() helpers: now we can take boilerplate "signal didn't have a handler, clear RESTORE_SIGMASK and restore the blocked mask from ->saved_mask" into a common helper. Open-coded instances switched... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 22 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is pending in the shared queue. Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0 ("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from happening again. Acked-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com> Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aurelien Jacquiot 提交于
Original port to early 2.6 kernel using TI COFF toolchain. Brought up to date by Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-