- 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 8 次提交
-
-
由 Hideo Aoki 提交于
This patch introduces new memory accounting functions for each network protocol. Most of them are renamed from memory accounting functions for stream protocols. At the same time, some stream memory accounting functions are removed since other functions do same thing. Renaming: sk_stream_free_skb() -> sk_wmem_free_skb() __sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> __sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_schedule -> __sk_mem_schedule() sk_stream_pages() -> sk_mem_pages() sk_stream_rmem_schedule() -> sk_rmem_schedule() sk_stream_wmem_schedule() -> sk_wmem_schedule() sk_charge_skb() -> sk_mem_charge() Removeing sk_stream_rfree(): consolidates into sock_rfree() sk_stream_set_owner_r(): consolidates into skb_set_owner_r() sk_stream_mem_schedule() The following functions are added. sk_has_account(): check if the protocol supports accounting sk_mem_uncharge(): do the opposite of sk_mem_charge() In addition, to achieve consolidation, updating sk_wmem_queued is removed from sk_mem_charge(). Next, to consolidate memory accounting functions, this patch adds memory accounting calls to network core functions. Moreover, present memory accounting call is renamed to new accounting call. Finally we replace present memory accounting calls with new interface in TCP and SCTP. Signed-off-by: NTakahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHideo Aoki <haoki@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP spec has a special case for processing ABORTs: F4) ... One special consideration is that ABORT Chunks arriving destined to the IP address being deleted MUST be ignored (see Section 5.3.1 for further details). Check if the address we received on is in the DEL state, and if so, ignore the ABORT. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the INIT/INIT-ACK exchange. Allow processing of this parameter during the INIT/INIT-ACK. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk may be a wildcard address. In this case special processing is required. For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is added. In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source address is marked as primary. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The crc32c library used an identical table and algorithm as SCTP. Switch to using the library instead of carrying our own table. Using crypto layer proved to have too much overhead compared to using the library directly. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The even should be called SCTP_AUTHENTICATION_INDICATION. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
During accept/migrate the code attempts to copy the addresses from the parent endpoint to the new endpoint. However, if the parent was bound to a wildcard address, then we end up pointlessly copying all of the current addresses on the system. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH requires selection of CRYPTO, HMAC and SHA1 since SHA1 is a MUST requirement for AUTH. We also support SHA256, but that's optional, so fix the code to treat it as such. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 10 11月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH and future ADD-IP updates have a requirement to do additional verification of parameters and an ability to ABORT the association if verification fails. So, introduce additional return code so that we can clear signal a required action. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Convert the custom hash list traversals to use hlist functions. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch adds a tunable that will allow ADD_IP to work without AUTH for backward compatibility. The default value is off since the default value for ADD_IP is off as well. People who need to use ADD-IP with older implementations take risks of connection hijacking and should consider upgrading or turning this tunable on. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
After learning more about rcu, it looks like the ADD-IP hadling doesn't need to call call_rcu_bh. All the rcu critical sections use rcu_read_lock, so using call_rcu_bh is wrong here. Now, restore the local_bh_disable() code blocks and use normal call_rcu() calls. Also restore the missing return statement. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Commit d0ce9291 broke several retransmit cases including fast retransmit. The reason is that we should only delay by rto while doing retranmists as a result of a timeout. Retransmit as a result of path mtu discover, fast retransmit, or other evernts that should trigger immidiate retransmissions got broken. Also, since rto is doubled prior to marking of packets elegable for retransmission, we never marked correct chunks anyway. The fix is provide a reason for a given retransmission so that we can mark chunks appropriately and to save the old rto value to do comparisons against. All regressions tests passed with this code. Spotted by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch makes three needlessly global functions static. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
sctp_update_copy_cksum() is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 10 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Add port randomization rather than a simple fixed rover for use with SCTP. This makes it act similar to TCP, UDP, DCCP when allocating ports. No longer need port_alloc_lock as well (suggestion by Brian Haley). Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP spec requires AUTH. It is, in fact, dangerous without AUTH. So, disable ADD-IP functionality if the peer claims to support ADD-IP, but not AUTH. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Add SCTP-AUTH API. The API implemented here was agreed to between implementors at the 9th SCTP Interop. It will be documented in the next revision of the SCTP socket API spec. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch implements the receive path needed to process authenticated chunks. Add ability to process the AUTH chunk and handle edge cases for authenticated COOKIE-ECHO as well. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2: Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has been requested by the peer. The other chunks MAY be sent authenticated or not. If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of them MUST be selected for authentication. To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these chunks after an AUTH chunk. This means that a sender MUST bundle chunks in order to authenticate them. If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key. If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts. In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with parameters from the original INIT chunk. Also, after restart, we need to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the association shared keys. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch implements the internals operations of the AUTH, such as key computation and storage. It also adds necessary variables to the SCTP data structures. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7 of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC). The parameter is encoded as: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | .... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension uses. Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability (FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK). When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new chunks need to be added to this parameter. Parameter processing would be modified to negotiate support for these new features. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
sctp_addto_param() can become static. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
This patch introduces autotuning to the sctp buffer management code similar to the TCP. The buffer space can be grown if the advertised receive window still has room. This might happen if small message sizes are used, which is common in telecom environmens. New tunables are introduced that provide limits to buffer growth and memory pressure is entered if to much buffer spaces is used. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It gets pointer to fastcall function, expects a pointer to normal one and calls the sucker. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 9月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If ADDIP is enabled, when an ASCONF chunk is received with ASCONF paramter length set to zero, this will cause infinite loop. By the way, if an malformed ASCONF chunk is received, will cause processing to access memory without verifying. This is because of not check the validity of parameters in ASCONF chunk. This patch fixed this. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
While processing OOTB chunks as well as chunks with an invalid length of 0, it was possible to SCTP to get wedged inside an infinite loop because we didn't catch the condition correctly, or didn't mark the packet for discard correctly. This work is based on original findings and work by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Since the sctp_sockaddr_entry is now RCU enabled as part of the patch to synchronize sctp_localaddr_list, it makes sense to change all handling of these entries to RCU. This includes the sctp_bind_addrs structure and it's list of bound addresses. This list is currently protected by an external rw_lock and that looks like an overkill. There are only 2 writers to the list: bind()/bindx() calls, and BH processing of ASCONF-ACK chunks. These are already seriealized via the socket lock, so they will not step on each other. These are also relatively rare, so we should be good with RCU. The readers are varied and they are easily converted to RCU. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSridhar Samdurala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
sctp_localaddr_list is modified dynamically via NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_DOWN events, but there is not synchronization between writer (even handler) and readers. As a result, the readers can access an entry that has been freed and crash the sytem. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSridhar Samdurala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad format. The chunk is like this: ABORT chunk Chunk type: ABORT (6) Chunk flags: 0x00 Chunk length: 72 (*1) Protocol violation cause Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d) Cause length: 62 (*2) Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062... Cause padding: 0000 [Needless] 00030010 Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the extend 4 bytes. ((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4 Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When we recieve a FWD-TSN (meaning the peer has abandoned the data), we need to clean up any partially received messages that may be hanging out on the re-assembly or re-ordering queues. This is a MUST requirement that was not properly done before. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com.>
-