1. 16 8月, 2006 2 次提交
  2. 10 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 09 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 08 8月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      [S390] xpram system device class. · 37ab46a3
      Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
      Remove system device class for xpram. It creates the directory hierarchy
      under /sys/devices/system/xpram/xpram0. The xpram0 directory is empty and
      it is always created while xpram1 and following devices are always missing,
      independent if the devices exist or not. Since the xpram devices are
      listed in /proc/partitions and /sys/block/ as slram<x> the system device
      class for xpram is meaningless.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      37ab46a3
  5. 07 8月, 2006 3 次提交
  6. 27 7月, 2006 2 次提交
  7. 18 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 17 7月, 2006 2 次提交
  9. 12 7月, 2006 4 次提交
  10. 11 7月, 2006 3 次提交
  11. 09 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  12. 04 7月, 2006 5 次提交
    • H
      [PATCH] zfcp: fix incorrect usage of fsf_req_list_lock · 38c54ee8
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
        =================================
        [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
        ---------------------------------
        inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
        swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
         (&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock){++..}, at: [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
        {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
          [<000000000005fb0c>] __lock_acquire+0xad8/0xed0
          [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
          [<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68
          [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
          [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430
          [<0000000000219dd4>] tiqdio_thinint_handler+0xd20/0x213c
          [<000000000020229a>] do_adapter_IO+0xb2/0xc0
          [<0000000000206f32>] do_IRQ+0x136/0x16c
          [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c
          [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250
        irq event stamp: 129220
        hardirqs last  enabled at (129220): [<00000000000411e6>] tasklet_hi_action+0x5a/0x19c
        hardirqs last disabled at (129219): [<00000000000411c0>] tasklet_hi_action+0x34/0x19c
        softirqs last  enabled at (129212): [<0000000000040b62>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x180
        softirqs last disabled at (129217): [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0
      
        other info that might help us debug this:
        no locks held by swapper/0.
      
        stack backtrace:
        00000000012bb670 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000012bb780
               00000000012bb6e8 0000000000399122 0000000000399122 0000000000016b0a
               0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000004660e8
               0000000000000000 000000000000000d 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb758
               0000000000368b90 0000000000016b0a 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb730
        Call Trace:
        ([<0000000000016a26>] show_trace+0x76/0xdc)
         [<0000000000016b2c>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0
         [<0000000000016b8a>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c
         [<000000000005e3da>] print_usage_bug+0x27e/0x290
         [<000000000005ea9c>] mark_lock+0x6b0/0x6c0
         [<000000000005f33e>] __lock_acquire+0x30a/0xed0
         [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
         [<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68
         [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
         [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430
         [<0000000000217bd2>] tiqdio_tl+0xd02/0x2120
         [<000000000004123a>] tasklet_hi_action+0xae/0x19c
         [<0000000000040ae4>] __do_softirq+0xbc/0x180
         [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0
         [<0000000000040c38>] irq_exit+0x90/0xa8
         [<0000000000206f40>] do_IRQ+0x144/0x16c
         [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c
         [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250
        ([<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250)
         [<000000000001405a>] rest_init+0x5a/0x68
         [<0000000000536998>] start_kernel+0x39c/0x3dc
         [<0000000000013046>] _stext+0x46/0x1000
      
      Fix incorrect usage of fsf_req_list_lock. It's used in tasklet context
      (irqs on) as well as in irq context. Therefore use the spin_lock_irqsave
      variant to avoid deadlocks.
      Acked-by: NAndreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      38c54ee8
    • H
      [PATCH] zfcp: fix incorrect usage of erp_lock · 9f09c548
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
        =================================
        [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
        ---------------------------------
        inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.
        swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
         (&adapter->erp_lock){+-..}, at: [<000000000026c7f8>] zfcp_erp_async_handler+0x3c/0x70
        {hardirq-on-W} state was registered at:
          [<000000000005f33e>] __lock_acquire+0x30a/0xed0
          [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
          [<000000000035a7ae>] _write_lock+0x4e/0x68
          [<000000000026d822>] zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_generic+0x286/0xd94
          [<000000000026fd72>] zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action+0x91e/0x1a94
          [<0000000000271a3a>] zfcp_erp_thread+0x21a/0x1568
          [<0000000000019096>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
          [<0000000000019090>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
        irq event stamp: 12078
        hardirqs last  enabled at (12077): [<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250
        hardirqs last disabled at (12078): [<0000000000020458>] io_no_vtime+0xc/0x1c
        softirqs last  enabled at (12072): [<0000000000040b62>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x180
        softirqs last disabled at (12059): [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0
      
        other info that might help us debug this:
        no locks held by swapper/0.
      
        stack backtrace:
        00000000012bb648 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000012bb758
               00000000012bb6c0 0000000000399122 0000000000399122 0000000000016b0a
               0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000004660e8
               0000000000000000 000000000000000d 00000000012bb6b8 00000000012bb730
               0000000000368b90 0000000000016b0a 00000000012bb6b8 00000000012bb708
        Call Trace:
        ([<0000000000016a26>] show_trace+0x76/0xdc)
         [<0000000000016b2c>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0
         [<0000000000016b8a>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c
         [<000000000005e3da>] print_usage_bug+0x27e/0x290
         [<000000000005e934>] mark_lock+0x548/0x6c0
         [<000000000005fb0c>] __lock_acquire+0xad8/0xed0
         [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
         [<000000000035a662>] _write_lock_irqsave+0x62/0x80
         [<000000000026c7f8>] zfcp_erp_async_handler+0x3c/0x70
         [<0000000000279178>] zfcp_fsf_req_dispatch+0xd8/0x1fa8
         [<000000000027e538>] zfcp_fsf_req_complete+0x104/0xe4c
         [<0000000000274534>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0xf4/0x178
         [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430
         [<0000000000219dd4>] tiqdio_thinint_handler+0xd20/0x213c
         [<000000000020229a>] do_adapter_IO+0xb2/0xc0
         [<0000000000206f32>] do_IRQ+0x136/0x16c
         [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c
         [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250
        ([<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250)
         [<000000000001405a>] rest_init+0x5a/0x68
         [<0000000000536998>] start_kernel+0x39c/0x3dc
         [<0000000000013046>] _stext+0x46/0x1000
      
      Fix incorrect usage of erp_lock. Using the write_lock() variant is wrong,
      since this might lead to deadlocks.
      Acked-by: NAndreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      9f09c548
    • H
      [PATCH] lockdep: annotate qeth driver · 91ebe2a9
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Annotate the qeth driver which uses a private skb-queue-head that is safely
      used in hardirq context too.
      
      Has no effect on non-lockdep kernels.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      91ebe2a9
    • H
      [PATCH] lockdep: s390 turn validator off in machine-check handler · 8e9ccae6
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Machine checks on s390 are always enabled (except in the machine check handler
      itself).  Therefore use lockdep_off()/on() in the machine check handler to
      avoid deadlocks in the lock validator.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      8e9ccae6
    • H
      [PATCH] lockdep: irqtrace subsystem, s390 support · 1f194a4c
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      irqtrace support for s390.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      1f194a4c
  13. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 29 6月, 2006 13 次提交