Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 3 年多

通知 13
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • K
      sched: Fix sched-domain avg_load calculation · b0432d8f
      由 Ken Chen 提交于 
      In function find_busiest_group(), the sched-domain avg_load isn't
calculated at all if there is a group imbalance within the domain. This
will cause erroneous imbalance calculation.

The reason is that calculate_imbalance() sees sds->avg_load = 0 and it
will dump entire sds->max_load into imbalance variable, which is used
later on to migrate entire load from busiest CPU to the puller CPU.

This has two really bad effect:

1. stampede of task migration, and they won't be able to break out
   of the bad state because of positive feedback loop: large load
   delta -> heavier load migration -> larger imbalance and the cycle
   goes on.

2. severe imbalance in CPU queue depth.  This causes really long
   scheduling latency blip which affects badly on application that
   has tight latency requirement.

The fix is to have kernel calculate domain avg_load in both cases. This
will ensure that imbalance calculation is always sensible and the target
is usually half way between busiest and puller CPU.
Signed-off-by: NKen Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110408002322.3A0D812217F@elm.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b0432d8f
  3. 05 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 31 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  7. 04 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2011 3 次提交
    • P
      sched: Fix the group_imb logic · 866ab43e
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      On a 2*6*2 machine something like:

 taskset -c 3-11 bash -c 'for ((i=0;i<9;i++)) do while :; do :; done & done'

_should_ result in 9 busy CPUs, each running 1 task.

However it didn't quite work reliably, most of the time one cpu of the
second socket (6-11) would be idle and one cpu of the first socket
(0-5) would have two tasks on it.

The group_imb logic is supposed to deal with this and detect when a
particular group is imbalanced (like in our case, 0-2 are idle but 3-5
will have 4 tasks on it).

The detection phase needed a bit of a tweak as it was too weak and
required more than 2 avg weight tasks difference between idle and busy
cpus in the group which won't trigger for our test-case. So cure that
to be one or more avg task weight difference between cpus.

Once the detection phase worked, it was then defeated by the f_b_g()
tests trying to avoid ping-pongs. In particular, this_load >= max_load
triggered because the pulling cpu (the (first) idle cpu in on the
second socket, say 6) would find this_load to be 5 and max_load to be
4 (there'd be 5 tasks running on our socket and only 4 on the other
socket).
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      866ab43e
    • P
      sched: Clean up some f_b_g() comments · cc57aa8f
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The existing comment tends to grow state (as it already has), split it
up and place it near the actual tests.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      cc57aa8f
    • P
      sched: Clean up remnants of sd_idle · c186fafe
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      With the wholesale removal of the sd_idle SMT logic we can clean up
some more.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c186fafe
  11. 16 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 03 2月, 2011 4 次提交
    • M
      sched: Add yield_to(task, preempt) functionality · d95f4122
      由 Mike Galbraith 提交于 
      Currently only implemented for fair class tasks.

Add a yield_to_task method() to the fair scheduling class. allowing the
caller of yield_to() to accelerate another thread in it's thread group,
task group.

Implemented via a scheduler hint, using cfs_rq->next to encourage the
target being selected.  We can rely on pick_next_entity to keep things
fair, so noone can accelerate a thread that has already used its fair
share of CPU time.

This also means callers should only call yield_to when they really
mean it.  Calling it too often can result in the scheduler just
ignoring the hint.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20110201095051.4ddb7738@annuminas.surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d95f4122
    • R
      sched: Use a buddy to implement yield_task_fair() · ac53db59
      由 Rik van Riel 提交于 
      Use the buddy mechanism to implement yield_task_fair.  This
allows us to skip onto the next highest priority se at every
level in the CFS tree, unless doing so would introduce gross
unfairness in CPU time distribution.

We order the buddy selection in pick_next_entity to check
yield first, then last, then next.  We need next to be able
to override yield, because it is possible for the "next" and
"yield" task to be different processen in the same sub-tree
of the CFS tree.  When they are, we need to go into that
sub-tree regardless of the "yield" hint, and pick the correct
entity once we get to the right level.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20110201095103.3a79e92a@annuminas.surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ac53db59
    • R
      sched: Limit the scope of clear_buddies · 2c13c919
      由 Rik van Riel 提交于 
      The clear_buddies function does not seem to play well with the concept
of hierarchical runqueues.  In the following tree, task groups are
represented by 'G', tasks by 'T', next by 'n' and last by 'l'.

     (nl)
    /    \
   G(nl)  G
   / \     \
 T(l) T(n)  T

This situation can arise when a task is woken up T(n), and the previously
running task T(l) is marked last.

When clear_buddies is called from either T(l) or T(n), the next and last
buddies of the group G(nl) will be cleared.  This is not the desired
result, since we would like to be able to find the other type of buddy
in many cases.

This especially a worry when implementing yield_task_fair through the
buddy system.

The fix is simple: only clear the buddy type that the task itself
is indicated to be.  As an added bonus, we stop walking up the tree
when the buddy has already been cleared or pointed elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.coM>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20110201094837.6b0962a9@annuminas.surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      2c13c919
    • R
      sched: Check the right ->nr_running in yield_task_fair() · 725e7580
      由 Rik van Riel 提交于 
      With CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, each task_group has its own cfs_rq.
Yielding to a task from another cfs_rq may be worthwhile, since
a process calling yield typically cannot use the CPU right now.

Therefor, we want to check the per-cpu nr_running, not the
cgroup local one.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20110201094715.798c4f86@annuminas.surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      725e7580
  15. 26 1月, 2011 6 次提交
  17. 24 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 18 1月, 2011 2 次提交
  21. 19 12月, 2010 2 次提交
    • P
      sched: Fix interactivity bug by charging unaccounted run-time on entity re-weight · 19e5eebb
      由 Paul Turner 提交于 
      Mike Galbraith reported poor interactivity[*] when the new shares distribution
code was combined with autogroups.

The root cause turns out to be a mis-ordering of accounting accrued execution
time and shares updates.  Since update_curr() is issued hierarchically,
updating the parent entity weights to reflect child enqueue/dequeue results in
the parent's unaccounted execution time then being accrued (vs vruntime) at the
new weight as opposed to the weight present at accumulation.

While this doesn't have much effect on processes with timeslices that cross a
tick, it is particularly problematic for an interactive process (e.g. Xorg)
which incurs many (tiny) timeslices.  In this scenario almost all updates are
at dequeue which can result in significant fairness perturbation (especially if
it is the only thread, resulting in potential {tg->shares, MIN_SHARES}
transitions).

Correct this by ensuring unaccounted time is accumulated prior to manipulating
an entity's weight.

[*] http://xkcd.com/619/ is perversely Nostradamian here.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <20101216031038.159704378@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      19e5eebb
    • P
      sched: Move periodic share updates to entity_tick() · 43365bd7
      由 Paul Turner 提交于 
      Long running entities that do not block (dequeue) require periodic updates to
maintain accurate share values.  (Note: group entities with several threads are
quite likely to be non-blocking in many circumstances).

By virtue of being long-running however, we will see entity ticks (otherwise
the required update occurs in dequeue/put and we are done).  Thus we can move
the detection (and associated work) for these updates into the periodic path.

This restores the 'atomicity' of update_curr() with respect to accounting.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20101216031038.067028969@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      43365bd7
  23. 23 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  25. 18 11月, 2010 12 次提交
  27. 11 11月, 2010 2 次提交
    • P
      sched: Fix cross-sched-class wakeup preemption · 1e5a7405
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Instead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr()
implementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption
path.

This fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the
stop machine thread to run ...
Reported-by: NMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Tested-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1288891946.2039.31.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1e5a7405
    • S
      sched: Use group weight, idle cpu metrics to fix imbalances during idle · aae6d3dd
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      Currently we consider a sched domain to be well balanced when the imbalance
is less than the domain's imablance_pct. As the number of cores and threads
are increasing, current values of imbalance_pct (for example 25% for a
NUMA domain) are not enough to detect imbalances like:

a) On a WSM-EP system (two sockets, each having 6 cores and 12 logical threads),
24 cpu-hogging tasks get scheduled as 13 on one socket and 11 on another
socket. Leading to an idle HT cpu.

b) On a hypothetial 2 socket NHM-EX system (each socket having 8 cores and
16 logical threads), 16 cpu-hogging tasks can get scheduled as 9 on one
socket and 7 on another socket. Leaving one core in a socket idle
whereas in another socket we have a core having both its HT siblings busy.

While this issue can be fixed by decreasing the domain's imbalance_pct
(by making it a function of number of logical cpus in the domain), it
can potentially cause more task migrations across sched groups in an
overloaded case.

Fix this by using imbalance_pct only during newly_idle and busy
load balancing. And during idle load balancing, check if there
is an imbalance in number of idle cpu's across the busiest and this
sched_group or if the busiest group has more tasks than its weight that
the idle cpu in this_group can pull.
Reported-by: NNikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1284760952.2676.11.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      aae6d3dd