1. 06 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      hung_task: fix the broken rcu_lock_break() logic · 6027ce49
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks()->rcu_lock_break() introduced by
      "softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task" commit ce9dbe24 looks
      absolutely wrong.
      
      	- rcu_lock_break() does put_task_struct(). If the task has exited
      	  it is not safe to even read its ->state, nothing protects this
      	  task_struct.
      
      	- The TASK_DEAD checks are wrong too. Contrary to the comment, we
      	  can't use it to check if the task was unhashed. It can be unhashed
      	  without TASK_DEAD, or it can be valid with TASK_DEAD.
      
      	  For example, an autoreaping task can do release_task(current)
      	  long before it sets TASK_DEAD in do_exit().
      
      	  Or, a zombie task can have ->state == TASK_DEAD but release_task()
      	  was not called, and in this case we must not break the loop.
      
      Change this code to check pid_alive() instead, and do this before we drop
      the reference to the task_struct.
      
      Note: while_each_thread() under rcu_read_lock() is not really safe, it can
      livelock.  This will be fixed later, but fortunately in this case the
      "max_count" logic saves us anyway.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
      Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6027ce49
  2. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 31 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 28 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 17 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  6. 27 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 24 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 09 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 06 2月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 19 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 16 1月, 2009 1 次提交