Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 2月, 2014 4 次提交
    • T
      bridge: Change local fdb entries whenever mac address of bridge device changes · a4b816d8
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      Vlan code may need fdb change when changing mac address of bridge device
even if it is caused by the mac address changing of a bridge port.

Example configuration:
  ip link set eth0 address 12:34:56:78:90:ab
  ip link set eth1 address aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
  brctl addif br0 eth0
  brctl addif br0 eth1 # br0 will have mac address 12:34:56:78:90:ab
  bridge vlan add dev br0 vid 10 self
  bridge vlan add dev eth0 vid 10
We will have fdb entry such that f->dst == NULL, f->vlan_id == 10 and
f->addr == 12:34:56:78:90:ab at this time.
Next, change the mac address of eth0 to greater value.
  ip link set eth0 address ee:ff:12:34:56:78
Then, mac address of br0 will be recalculated and set to aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff.
However, an entry aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff will not be created and we will be not
able to communicate using br0 on vlan 10.

Address this issue by deleting and adding local entries whenever
changing the mac address of the bridge device.

If there already exists an entry that has the same address, for example,
in case that br_fdb_changeaddr() has already inserted it,
br_fdb_change_mac_address() will simply fail to insert it and no
duplicated entry will be made, as it was.

This approach also needs br_add_if() to call br_fdb_insert() before
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id() so that we don't create an entry whose
dst == NULL in this function to preserve previous behavior.

Note that this is a slight change in behavior where the bridge device can
receive the traffic to the new address before calling
br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id() in br_add_if().
However, it is not a problem because we have already the address on the
new port and such a way to insert new one before recalculating bridge id
is taken in br_device_event() as well.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a4b816d8
    • T
      bridge: Fix the way to find old local fdb entries in br_fdb_change_mac_address · a3ebb7ef
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      We have been always failed to delete the old entry at
br_fdb_change_mac_address() because br_set_mac_address() updates
dev->dev_addr before calling br_fdb_change_mac_address() and
br_fdb_change_mac_address() uses dev->dev_addr to find the old entry.

That update of dev_addr is completely unnecessary because the same work
is done in br_stp_change_bridge_id() which is called right away after
calling br_fdb_change_mac_address().
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a3ebb7ef
    • T
      bridge: Fix the way to insert new local fdb entries in br_fdb_changeaddr · 2836882f
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      Since commit bc9a25d2 ("bridge: Add vlan support for local fdb entries"),
br_fdb_changeaddr() has inserted a new local fdb entry only if it can
find old one. But if we have two ports where they have the same address
or user has deleted a local entry, there will be no entry for one of the
ports.

Example of problematic case:
  ip link set eth0 address aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
  ip link set eth1 address aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
  brctl addif br0 eth0
  brctl addif br0 eth1 # eth1 will not have a local entry due to dup.
  ip link set eth1 address 12:34:56:78:90:ab
Then, the new entry for the address 12:34:56:78:90:ab will not be
created, and the bridge device will not be able to communicate.

Insert new entries regardless of whether we can find old entries or not.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2836882f
    • T
      bridge: Fix the way to find old local fdb entries in br_fdb_changeaddr · a5642ab4
      由 Toshiaki Makita 提交于 
      br_fdb_changeaddr() assumes that there is at most one local entry per port
per vlan. It used to be true, but since commit 36fd2b63 ("bridge: allow
creating/deleting fdb entries via netlink"), it has not been so.
Therefore, the function might fail to search a correct previous address
to be deleted and delete an arbitrary local entry if user has added local
entries manually.

Example of problematic case:
  ip link set eth0 address ee:ff:12:34:56:78
  brctl addif br0 eth0
  bridge fdb add 12:34:56:78:90:ab dev eth0 master
  ip link set eth0 address aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
Then, the address 12:34:56:78:90:ab might be deleted instead of
ee:ff:12:34:56:78, the original mac address of eth0.

Address this issue by introducing a new flag, added_by_user, to struct
net_bridge_fdb_entry.

Note that br_fdb_delete_by_port() has to set added_by_user to 0 in cases
like:
  ip link set eth0 address 12:34:56:78:90:ab
  ip link set eth1 address aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
  brctl addif br0 eth0
  bridge fdb add aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff dev eth0 master
  brctl addif br0 eth1
  brctl delif br0 eth0
In this case, kernel should delete the user-added entry aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff,
but it also should have been added by "brctl addif br0 eth1" originally,
so we don't delete it and treat it a new kernel-created entry.
Signed-off-by: NToshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a5642ab4
  3. 10 2月, 2014 22 次提交
  5. 08 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 07 2月, 2014 11 次提交