1. 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead · b8bd759a
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
      invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
      unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
      by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
      invocations of it to do nothing.
      
      For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
      acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it.  Additionally, rearrange the
      code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
      acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      b8bd759a
  2. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 03 1月, 2013 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument · 0cd6ac52
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
      succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
      the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
      this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
      too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
      acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
      one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
      handle).
      
      For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
      whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
      its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
      anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
      useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
      executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
      
      Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
      existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
      acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
      argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
      use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
      needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      0cd6ac52
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used · 636458de
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
      redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
      necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
      lines of code (Linus will like that).
      
      Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
      its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
      note to self to take care of that later).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      636458de
  4. 22 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 16 11月, 2012 6 次提交
  6. 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  9. 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Major update for acpi_get_object_info external interface · 15b8dd53
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface.
      Changes include:
       - Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings
       - Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.)
       - Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object
       - Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge
       - Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO.
      These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface.
      See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details.
      
      Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      15b8dd53
  11. 03 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  12. 26 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 08 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 11 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 24 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  18. 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  19. 13 2月, 2007 3 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: delete extra #defines in /drivers/acpi/ drivers · 7cda93e0
      Len Brown 提交于
      Cosmetic only.
      
      Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME
      were invoked 0 or 1 times.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      7cda93e0
    • L
      ACPI: fix acpi_driver.name usage · c2b6705b
      Len Brown 提交于
      It was erroneously used as a description rather than a name.
      
      ie. turn this:
      
      lenb@se7525gp2:/sys> ls bus/acpi/drivers
      ACPI AC Adapter Driver  ACPI Embedded Controller Driver  ACPI Power Resource Driver
      ACPI Battery Driver     ACPI Fan Driver                  ACPI Processor Driver
      ACPI Button Driver      ACPI PCI Interrupt Link Driver   ACPI Thermal Zone Driver
      ACPI container driver   ACPI PCI Root Bridge Driver      hpet
      
      into this:
      
      lenb@se7525gp2:~> ls /sys/bus/acpi/drivers
      ac  battery  button  container  ec  fan  hpet  pci_link  pci_root  power  processor  thermal
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      c2b6705b
    • L
      ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() use · f52fd66d
      Len Brown 提交于
      cosmetic only
      
      Make "module name" actually match the file name.
      Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
      Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      f52fd66d
  20. 21 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 21 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  22. 14 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  24. 16 8月, 2006 1 次提交
    • Y
      ACPI: memory hotplug: remove useless message at boot time · 07dd4855
      Yasunori Goto 提交于
      This is to remove noisy useless message at boot.  The message is a ton of
      "ACPI Exception (acpi_memory-0492): AE_ERROR, handle is no memory device"
      
      In my emulation, number of memory devices are not so many (only 6), but,
      this messages are displayed 114 times.
      
      It is showed by acpi_memory_register_notify_handler() which is called by
      acpi_walk_namespace().
      
      acpi_walk_namespace() parses all of ACPI's namespace and execute
      acpi_memory_register_notify_handler().  So, it is called for all of the
      device which is defined in namespace.  If the parsing device is not memory,
      acpi_memhotplug ignores it due to "no match" and will parse next device.
      This is normal route, not an exception.
      Signed-off-by: NYasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      07dd4855
  25. 06 8月, 2006 2 次提交
  26. 30 6月, 2006 3 次提交