Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 大约 4 年

通知 14
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 31 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 23 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  7. 14 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      vfat: fix 'sync' mount deadlock due to BKL->lock_super conversion · 5f22ca9b
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      There was another FAT BKL conversion deadlock reported by Bart
Trojanowski due to the BKL being used as a recursive lock by FAT, which
was missed because it only triggers with 'sync' (or 'dirsync') mounts.

The recursion worked for the BKL, but after the conversion to lock_super
(which uses a mutex), it just deadlocks.

Thanks to Bart for debugging this and testing the fix.  The lock
debugging information from the original report:

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  2.6.27-rc3-bisect-00448-ga7f5aaf3 #16
  ---------------------------------------------
  mv/4020 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20

  other info that might help us debug this:
  3 locks held by mv/4020:
   #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9/1){--..}, at: [<c01b2336>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x140
   #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01b0954>] vfs_unlink+0x84/0x110
   #2:  (&type->s_lock_key#9){--..}, at: [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20

  stack backtrace:
  Pid: 4020, comm: mv Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-bisect-00448-ga7f5aaf3 #16
   [<c014e694>] validate_chain+0x984/0xea0
   [<c0108d70>] ? native_sched_clock+0x0/0xf0
   [<c014ee9c>] __lock_acquire+0x2ec/0x9b0
   [<c014f5cf>] lock_acquire+0x6f/0x90
   [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
   [<c044e5fd>] mutex_lock_nested+0xad/0x300
   [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
   [<c01a90fe>] ? lock_super+0x1e/0x20
   [<c01a90fe>] lock_super+0x1e/0x20
   [<f8b3a700>] fat_write_inode+0x60/0x2b0 [fat]
   [<c0450878>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x80
   [<f8b3a953>] ? fat_sync_inode+0x3/0x20 [fat]
   [<f8b3a962>] fat_sync_inode+0x12/0x20 [fat]
   [<f8b37c7e>] fat_remove_entries+0xbe/0x120 [fat]
   [<f8b422ef>] vfat_unlink+0x5f/0x90 [vfat]
   [<f8b42290>] ? vfat_unlink+0x0/0x90 [vfat]
   [<c01b0968>] vfs_unlink+0x98/0x110
   [<c01b2400>] do_unlinkat+0x130/0x140
   [<c016a8f5>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x105/0x150
   [<c01b253b>] sys_unlinkat+0x3b/0x40
   [<c01040d3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x3f
   =======================

where the deadlock is due to the nesting of lock_super from vfat_unlink
to fat_write_inode:

 - do_unlinkat
   - vfs_unlink
     - vfat_unlink
       * lock_super
       - fat_remove_entries
         - fat_sync_inode
           - fat_write_inode
             * lock_super

and the fix is to simply remove the use of lock_super() in fat_write_inode.

The lock_super() there had been just an automatic conversion of the
kernel lock to the superblock lock, but no locking was actually needed
there, since the code in fat_write_inode already protected all relevant
accesses with a spinlock (sbi->inode_hash_lock to be exact).  The only
code inside the BKL (and thus the superblock lock) was accesses tp local
variables or calls to functions that have long been SMP-safe (i.e.
sb_bread, mark_buffe_dirty and brlese).

Bart reports:
 "Looks good.  I ran 10 parallel processes creating 1M files truncating
  them, writing to them again and then deleting them.  This patch fixes
  the issue I ran into.

  Signed-off-by: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>"
Reported-and-tested-by: NBart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5f22ca9b
  13. 03 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 27 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 26 7月, 2008 6 次提交
  19. 03 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 21 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      Replace BKL with superblock lock in fat/msdos/vfat · 8f593427
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This replaces the use of the BKL in the FAT family of filesystems with the
existing superblock lock instead.

The code already appears to do mostly proper locking with its own private
spinlocks (and mutexes), but while the BKL could possibly have been
dropped entirely, converting it to use the superblock lock (which is just
a regular mutex) is the conservative thing to do.

As a per-filesystem mutex, it not only won't have any of the possible
latency issues related to the BKL, but the lock is obviously private to
the particular filesystem instance and will thus not cause problems for
entirely unrelated users like the BKL can.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      8f593427
  23. 13 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 28 4月, 2008 10 次提交
  31. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 09 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 08 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  37. 07 2月, 2008 2 次提交
    • V
      FAT: Fix printk format strings · b4cf9c34
      由 Vegard Nossum 提交于 
      This makes sure printk format strings contain no more than a single line.
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
[the message was tweaked.]
Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b4cf9c34
    • J
      fs/fat/: refine chmod checks · 19c561a6
      由 Jan Engelhardt 提交于 
      Prohibit mode changes in non-quiet mode that cannot be stored reliably with
the on-disk format.

Suppose a vfat filesystem is mounted with umask=0 and [not-quiet].  Then
all files will have mode 0777.  Trying to change the owner will fail,
because fat does not know about owners or groups.  chmod 0770, on the other
hand, will succeed, even though fat does not know about the permission
triplet [user/group/other].

So this patch changes fat's not-quiet behavior so that only UNIX modes are
accepted that can be mapped lossless between the fat disk format and the
local system.  There is only one attribute, and that is the readonly
attribute, which is mapped to the UNIX write permission bit(s).  chmod 0555
is therefore valid (taking away the +w bits <=> setting the readonly
attribute).  Since chmod 0775 and chmod 0755 is an ambiguous case as to
whether to set or clear the readonly bit, these modes are also denied.

In quiet mode, chmod and chown will continue to "succeed" as they did
before, meaning that a subsequent stat() will temporarily return the new
mode as long as the inode is not reread from disk, and chown will silently
do nothing, not even return the new uid/gid in stat().
Signed-off-by: NJan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      19c561a6
  39. 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  41. 22 10月, 2007 2 次提交