1. 30 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t · 34845636
      Andreas Schwab 提交于
      Commit 2a95ea6c ("procfs: do not overflow get_{idle,iowait}_time
      for nohz") did not take into account that one some architectures jiffies
      and cputime use different units.
      
      This causes get_idle_time() to return numbers in the wrong units, making
      the idle time fields in /proc/stat wrong.
      
      Instead of converting the usec value returned by
      get_cpu_{idle,iowait}_time_us to units of jiffies, use the new function
      usecs_to_cputime64 to convert it to the correct unit of cputime64_t.
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>
      Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      34845636
  2. 15 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 03 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 03 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 04 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      taskstats scaled time cleanup · 06b8e878
      Michael Neuling 提交于
      This moves the ability to scale cputime into generic code.  This allows us
      to fix the issue in kernel/timer.c (noticed by Balbir) where we could only
      add an unscaled value to the scaled utime/stime.
      
      This adds a cputime_to_scaled function.  As before, the POWERPC version
      does the scaling based on the last SPURR/PURR ratio calculated.  The
      generic and s390 (only other arch to implement asm/cputime.h) versions are
      both NOPs.
      
      Also moves the SPURR and PURR snapshots closer.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
      Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      06b8e878
  8. 06 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 24 2月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Implement accurate task and CPU time accounting · c6622f63
      Paul Mackerras 提交于
      This implements accurate task and cpu time accounting for 64-bit
      powerpc kernels.  Instead of accounting a whole jiffy of time to a
      task on a timer interrupt because that task happened to be running at
      the time, we now account time in units of timebase ticks according to
      the actual time spent by the task in user mode and kernel mode.  We
      also count the time spent processing hardware and software interrupts
      accurately.  This is conditional on CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING.  If
      that is not set, we do tick-based approximate accounting as before.
      
      To get this accurate information, we read either the PURR (processor
      utilization of resources register) on POWER5 machines, or the timebase
      on other machines on
      
      * each entry to the kernel from usermode
      * each exit to usermode
      * transitions between process context, hard irq context and soft irq
        context in kernel mode
      * context switches.
      
      On POWER5 systems with shared-processor logical partitioning we also
      read both the PURR and the timebase at each timer interrupt and
      context switch in order to determine how much time has been taken by
      the hypervisor to run other partitions ("steal" time).  Unfortunately,
      since we need values of the PURR on both threads at the same time to
      accurately calculate the steal time, and since we can only calculate
      steal time on a per-core basis, the apportioning of the steal time
      between idle time (time which we ceded to the hypervisor in the idle
      loop) and actual stolen time is somewhat approximate at the moment.
      
      This is all based quite heavily on what s390 does, and it uses the
      generic interfaces that were added by the s390 developers,
      i.e. account_system_time(), account_user_time(), etc.
      
      This patch doesn't add any new interfaces between the kernel and
      userspace, and doesn't change the units in which time is reported to
      userspace by things such as /proc/stat, /proc/<pid>/stat, getrusage(),
      times(), etc.  Internally the various task and cpu times are stored in
      timebase units, but they are converted to USER_HZ units (1/100th of a
      second) when reported to userspace.  Some precision is therefore lost
      but there should not be any accumulating error, since the internal
      accumulation is at full precision.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      c6622f63
  10. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交