1. 30 3月, 2013 2 次提交
    • C
      SUNRPC: Introduce rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor() · 9568c5e9
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      A SECINFO reply may contain flavors whose kernel module is not
      yet loaded by the client's kernel.  A new RPC client API, called
      rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor(), is introduced to do proper checking
      for support of a security flavor.
      
      When this API is invoked, the RPC client now tries to load the
      module for each flavor first before performing the "is this
      supported?" check.  This means if a module is available on the
      client, but has not been loaded yet, it will be loaded and
      registered automatically when the SECINFO reply is processed.
      
      The new API can take a full GSS tuple (OID, QoP, and service).
      Previously only the OID and service were considered.
      
      nfs_find_best_sec() is updated to verify all flavors requested in a
      SECINFO reply, including AUTH_NULL and AUTH_UNIX.  Previously these
      two flavors were simply assumed to be supported without consulting
      the RPC client.
      
      Note that the replaced version of nfs_find_best_sec() can return
      RPC_AUTH_MAXFLAVOR if the server returns a recognized OID but an
      unsupported "service" value.  nfs_find_best_sec() now returns
      RPC_AUTH_UNIX in this case.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      9568c5e9
    • C
      SUNRPC: Define rpcsec_gss_info structure · fb15b26f
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      The NFSv4 SECINFO procedure returns a list of security flavors.  Any
      GSS flavor also has a GSS tuple containing an OID, a quality-of-
      protection value, and a service value, which specifies a particular
      GSS pseudoflavor.
      
      For simplicity and efficiency, I'd like to return each GSS tuple
      from the NFSv4 SECINFO XDR decoder and pass it straight into the RPC
      client.
      
      Define a data structure that is visible to both the NFS client and
      the RPC client.  Take structure and field names from the relevant
      standards to avoid confusion.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      fb15b26f
  2. 17 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      SUNRPC: Add rpcauth_list_flavors() · 6a1a1e34
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      The gss_mech_list_pseudoflavors() function provides a list of
      currently registered GSS pseudoflavors.  This list does not include
      any non-GSS flavors that have been registered with the RPC client.
      nfs4_find_root_sec() currently adds these extra flavors by hand.
      
      Instead, nfs4_find_root_sec() should be looking at the set of flavors
      that have been explicitly registered via rpcauth_register().  And,
      other areas of code will soon need the same kind of list that
      contains all flavors the kernel currently knows about (see below).
      
      Rather than cloning the open-coded logic in nfs4_find_root_sec() to
      those new places, introduce a generic RPC function that generates a
      full list of registered auth flavors and pseudoflavors.
      
      A new rpc_authops method is added that lists a flavor's
      pseudoflavors, if it has any.  I encountered an interesting module
      loader loop when I tried to get the RPC client to invoke
      gss_mech_list_pseudoflavors() by name.
      
      This patch is a pre-requisite for server trunking discovery, and a
      pre-requisite for fixing up the in-kernel mount client to do better
      automatic security flavor selection.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      6a1a1e34
  3. 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 15 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  5. 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 11 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  8. 04 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 27 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 19 10月, 2005 2 次提交
  11. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4