1. 21 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • L
      x86, 64-bit: Clean up user address masking · 9063c61f
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      The discussion about using "access_ok()" in get_user_pages_fast() (see
      commit 7f818906: "x86: don't use
      'access_ok()' as a range check in get_user_pages_fast()" for details and
      end result), made us notice that x86-64 was really being very sloppy
      about virtual address checking.
      
      So be way more careful and straightforward about masking x86-64 virtual
      addresses:
      
       - All the VIRTUAL_MASK* variants now cover half of the address
         space, it's not like we can use the full mask on a signed
         integer, and the larger mask just invites mistakes when
         applying it to either half of the 48-bit address space.
      
       - /proc/kcore's kc_offset_to_vaddr() becomes a lot more
         obvious when it transforms a file offset into a
         (kernel-half) virtual address.
      
       - Unify/simplify the 32-bit and 64-bit USER_DS definition to
         be based on TASK_SIZE_MAX.
      
      This cleanup and more careful/obvious user virtual address checking also
      uncovered a buglet in the x86-64 implementation of strnlen_user(): it
      would do an "access_ok()" check on the whole potential area, even if the
      string itself was much shorter, and thus return an error even for valid
      strings. Our sloppy checking had hidden this.
      
      So this fixes 'strnlen_user()' to do this properly, the same way we
      already handled user strings in 'strncpy_from_user()'.  Namely by just
      checking the first byte, and then relying on fault handling for the
      rest.  That always works, since we impose a guard page that cannot be
      mapped at the end of the user space address space (and even if we
      didn't, we'd have the address space hole).
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9063c61f
  2. 21 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      x86: use early clobbers in usercopy*.c · e0a96129
      Andi Kleen 提交于
      Impact: fix rare (but currently harmless) miscompile with certain configs and gcc versions
      
      Hugh Dickins noticed that strncpy_from_user() was miscompiled
      in some circumstances with gcc 4.3.
      
      Thanks to Hugh's excellent analysis it was easy to track down.
      
      Hugh writes:
      
      > Try building an x86_64 defconfig 2.6.29-rc1 kernel tree,
      > except not quite defconfig, switch CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
      > and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY off (because it expands a
      > might_fault() there, which hides the issue): using a
      > gcc 4.3.2 (I've checked both openSUSE 11.1 and Fedora 10).
      >
      > It generates the following:
      >
      > 0000000000000000 <__strncpy_from_user>:
      >    0:   48 89 d1                mov    %rdx,%rcx
      >    3:   48 85 c9                test   %rcx,%rcx
      >    6:   74 0e                   je     16 <__strncpy_from_user+0x16>
      >    8:   ac                      lods   %ds:(%rsi),%al
      >    9:   aa                      stos   %al,%es:(%rdi)
      >    a:   84 c0                   test   %al,%al
      >    c:   74 05                   je     13 <__strncpy_from_user+0x13>
      >    e:   48 ff c9                dec    %rcx
      >   11:   75 f5                   jne    8 <__strncpy_from_user+0x8>
      >   13:   48 29 c9                sub    %rcx,%rcx
      >   16:   48 89 c8                mov    %rcx,%rax
      >   19:   c3                      retq
      >
      > Observe that "sub %rcx,%rcx; mov %rcx,%rax", whereas gcc 4.2.1
      > (and many other configs) say "sub %rcx,%rdx; mov %rdx,%rax".
      > Isn't it returning 0 when it ought to be returning strlen?
      
      The asm constraints for the strncpy_from_user() result were missing an
      early clobber, which tells gcc that the last output arguments
      are written before all input arguments are read.
      
      Also add more early clobbers in the rest of the file and fix 32-bit
      usercopy.c in the same way.
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      [ since this API is rarely used and no in-kernel user relies on a 'len'
        return value (they only rely on negative return values) this miscompile
        was never noticed in the field. But it's worth fixing it nevertheless. ]
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e0a96129
  3. 11 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths · c10d38dd
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      copy_to/from_user and all its variants (except the atomic ones) can take a
      page fault and perform non-trivial work like taking mmap_sem and entering
      the filesyste/pagecache.
      
      Unfortunately, this often escapes lockdep because a common pattern is to
      use it to read in some arguments just set up from userspace, or write data
      back to a hot buffer. In those cases, it will be unlikely for page reclaim
      to get a window in to cause copy_*_user to fault.
      
      With the new might_lock primitives, add some annotations to x86. I don't
      know if I caught all possible faulting points (it's a bit of a maze, and I
      didn't really look at 32-bit). But this is a starting point.
      
      Boots and runs OK so far.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c10d38dd
  5. 09 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 04 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
  8. 27 6月, 2006 2 次提交
  9. 12 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4