Skip to content

K
kernel_linux

OpenHarmony / kernel_linux
上一次同步 3 年多

通知 13
Star 8
Fork 2
K
kernel_linux
切换分支/标签
  1. 04 7月, 2013 10 次提交
  3. 30 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 28 6月, 2013 8 次提交
  7. 27 6月, 2013 18 次提交
  9. 26 6月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      mutex: Add w/w mutex slowpath debugging · 23010027
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      Injects EDEADLK conditions at pseudo-random interval, with
exponential backoff up to UINT_MAX (to ensure that every lock
operation still completes in a reasonable time).

This way we can test the wound slowpath even for ww mutex users
where contention is never expected, and the ww deadlock
avoidance algorithm is only needed for correctness against
malicious userspace. An example would be protecting kernel
modesetting properties, which thanks to single-threaded X isn't
really expected to contend, ever.

I've looked into using the CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
infrastructure, but decided against it for two reasons:

- EDEADLK handling is mandatory for ww mutex users and should
  never affect the outcome of a syscall. This is in contrast to -ENOMEM
  injection. So fine configurability isn't required.

- The fault injection framework only allows to set a simple
  probability for failure. Now the probability that a ww mutex acquire
  stage with N locks will never complete (due to too many injected
  EDEADLK backoffs) is zero. But the expected number of ww_mutex_lock
  operations for the completely uncontended case would be O(exp(N)).
  The per-acuiqire ctx exponential backoff solution choosen here only
  results in O(log N) overhead due to injection and so O(log N * N)
  lock operations. This way we can fail with high probability (and so
  have good test coverage even for fancy backoff and lock acquisition
  paths) without running into patalogical cases.

Note that EDEADLK will only ever be injected when we managed to
acquire the lock. This prevents any behaviour changes for users
which rely on the EALREADY semantics.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113117.4001.21681.stgit@patserSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      23010027
    • M
      mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks · 040a0a37
      由 Maarten Lankhorst 提交于 
      Wound/wait mutexes are used when other multiple lock
acquisitions of a similar type can be done in an arbitrary
order. The deadlock handling used here is called wait/wound in
the RDBMS literature: The older tasks waits until it can acquire
the contended lock. The younger tasks needs to back off and drop
all the locks it is currently holding, i.e. the younger task is
wounded.

For full documentation please read Documentation/ww-mutex-design.txt.

References: https://lwn.net/Articles/548909/Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C8038C.9000106@canonical.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      040a0a37