1. 31 1月, 2007 1 次提交
  2. 12 1月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] NFS: Fix race in nfs_release_page() · e3db7691
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
          NFS: Fix race in nfs_release_page()
      
          invalidate_inode_pages2() may find the dirty bit has been set on a page
          owing to the fact that the page may still be mapped after it was locked.
          Only after the call to unmap_mapping_range() are we sure that the page
          can no longer be dirtied.
          In order to fix this, NFS has hooked the releasepage() method and tries
          to write the page out between the call to unmap_mapping_range() and the
          call to remove_mapping(). This, however leads to deadlocks in the page
          reclaim code, where the page may be locked without holding a reference
          to the inode or dentry.
      
          Fix is to add a new address_space_operation, launder_page(), which will
          attempt to write out a dirty page without releasing the page lock.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      
          Also, the bare SetPageDirty() can skew all sort of accounting leading to
          other nasties.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: cleanup]
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e3db7691
  3. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 06 12月, 2006 5 次提交
  5. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 23 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  7. 25 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      [PATCH] vfs: add lock owner argument to flush operation · 75e1fcc0
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      Pass the POSIX lock owner ID to the flush operation.
      
      This is useful for filesystems which don't want to store any locking state
      in inode->i_flock but want to handle locking/unlocking POSIX locks
      internally.  FUSE is one such filesystem but I think it possible that some
      network filesystems would need this also.
      
      Also add a flag to indicate that a POSIX locking request was generated by
      close(), so filesystems using the above feature won't send an extra locking
      request in this case.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      75e1fcc0
  10. 09 6月, 2006 2 次提交
  11. 20 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  12. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 27 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 21 3月, 2006 5 次提交
  15. 23 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  16. 20 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  17. 28 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  18. 19 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  19. 18 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  20. 19 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  21. 23 6月, 2005 3 次提交
  22. 14 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  23. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4