... if you revert a commit, revert the fixups elsewhere that had been
triggered by it.  Such as 8c56250f
(lockdep, UML: fix compilation when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is not set).
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Long-term we want to split system.h and include barriers part from
underlying target; for now copy that part to sysdep.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Hiroshi Shimamoto reported:

> > !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT mode of build for future work, it can be
> > restored via a simple revert.
>
> Hi, it seems that this patch breaks uml build.
>
> kernel/printk.c: In function 'vprintk':
> kernel/printk.c:674: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'raw_local_irq_save' kernel/printk.c:772: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'raw_local_irq_restore'

With the patch bellow it compiles (make ARCH=um with a x86 host), but I'm
really out of my league on this one...
Reported-by: NHiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!