- 23 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2009 39 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
With this commit, extent tree operations are divorced from inodes and rely on ocfs2_caching_info. Phew! Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We only allow unwritten extents on data, so the toplevel ocfs2_mark_extent_written() can use an inode all it wants. But the subfunction isn't even using the inode argument. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Don't use a struct inode anymore. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It already has an extent_tree. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more generic btree function that is isolated from struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function that doesn't need a struct inode to pass to its children. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function down, no inode in the entire insert-extent chain. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_insert_extent() wants to insert a record into the extent map if it's an inode data extent. But since many btrees can call that function, let's make it an op on ocfs2_extent_tree. Other tree types can leave it empty. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It's not using it, so remove it from the parameter list. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It already has an ocfs2_extent_tree and doesn't need the inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We don't want struct inode in generic btree operations. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Don't pass the inode in. We don't want it around for generic btree operations. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
They aren't using it, so remove it from their parameter lists. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Another on the way to generic btree functions. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Give it an ocfs2_extent_tree and it is happy. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_remove_extent() wants to truncate the extent map if it's truncating an inode data extent. But since many btrees can call that function, let's make it an op on ocfs2_extent_tree. Other tree types can leave it empty. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It's not using it anymore. Remove it from the parameter list. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_grow_branch() not really using it other than to pass it to the subfunctions ocfs2_shift_tree_depth(), ocfs2_find_branch_target(), and ocfs2_add_branch(). The first two weren't it either, so they drop the argument. ocfs2_add_branch() only passed it to ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_branch(), which drops the inode argument and uses the ocfs2_extent_tree as well. ocfs2_append_rec_to_path() can be take an ocfs2_extent_tree instead of the inode. The function ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records() goes along for the ride. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It's not using it, so remove it from the parameter list. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Drop it from the parameters - they already have ocfs2_extent_list. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It already gets ocfs2_extent_tree, so we can just use that. This chains to the same modification for ocfs2_remove_rightmost_path() and ocfs2_rotate_rightmost_leaf_left(). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It already has struct ocfs2_extent_tree, which has the caching info. So we don't need to pass it struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
It already has struct ocfs2_extent_tree, which has the caching info. So we don't need to pass it struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Pass in the extent tree, which is all we need. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We don't need struct inode in ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() anymore. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We can get to the inode from the caching information. Other parent types don't need it. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Get rid of the inode argument. Use extent_tree instead. This means a few more functions have to pass an extent_tree around. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Pass the ocfs2_extent_list down through ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() and get rid of struct inode in ocfs2_rotate_subtree_root_right(). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Completely unused argument. Get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_unlink_path() doesn't need struct inode, so let's pass it struct ocfs2_extent_tree. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Pass struct ocfs2_extent_tree into ocfs2_create_new_meta_bhs(). It no longer needs struct inode or ocfs2_super. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_find_path and ocfs2_find_leaf() walk our btrees, reading extent blocks. They need struct ocfs2_caching_info for that, but not struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
extent blocks belong to btrees on more than just inodes, so we want to pass the ocfs2_caching_info structure directly to ocfs2_read_extent_block(). A number of places in alloc.c can now drop struct inode from their argument list. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
What do we cache? Metadata blocks. What are most of our non-inode metadata blocks? Extent blocks for our btrees. struct ocfs2_extent_tree is the main structure for managing those. So let's store the associated ocfs2_caching_info there. This means that ocfs2_et_root_journal_access() doesn't need struct inode anymore, and any place that has an et can refer to et->et_ci instead of INODE_CACHE(inode). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The next step in divorcing metadata I/O management from struct inode is to pass struct ocfs2_caching_info to the journal functions. Thus the journal locks a metadata cache with the cache io_lock function. It also can compare ci_last_trans and ci_created_trans directly. This is a large patch because of all the places we change ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, inode, ...) to ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), ...). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Similar ip_last_trans, ip_created_trans tracks the creation of a journal managed inode. This specifically tracks what transaction created the inode. This is so the code can know if the inode has ever been written to disk. This behavior is desirable for any journal managed object. We move it to struct ocfs2_caching_info as ci_created_trans so that any object using ocfs2_caching_info can rely on this behavior. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We have the read side of metadata caching isolated to struct ocfs2_caching_info, now we need the write side. This means the journal functions. The journal only does a couple of things with struct inode. This change moves the ip_last_trans field onto struct ocfs2_caching_info as ci_last_trans. This field tells the journal whether a pending journal flush is required. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We are really passing the inode into the ocfs2_read/write_blocks() functions to get at the metadata cache. This commit passes the cache directly into the metadata block functions, divorcing them from the inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We don't really want to cart around too many new fields on the ocfs2_caching_info structure. So let's wrap all our access of the parent object in a set of operations. One pointer on caching_info, and more flexibility to boot. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-