- 02 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
Every time a new input device that is capable of one of the rfkill EV_SW events (currently only SW_RFKILL_ALL) is connected to rfkill-input, we must check the states of the input EV_SW switches and take action. Otherwise, we will ignore the initial switch state. We also need to re-check the states of the EV_SW switches after a device that was under an exclusive grab is released back to us, since we got no input events from that device while it was grabbed. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
The current naming of rfkill_state causes a lot of confusion: not only the "kill" in rfkill suggests negative logic, but also the fact that rfkill cannot turn anything on (it can just force something off or stop forcing something off) is often forgotten. Rename RFKILL_STATE_OFF to RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked and will not operate; state can be changed by a toggle_radio request), and RFKILL_STATE_ON to RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED (transmitter is not blocked, and may operate). Also, add a new third state, RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked and will not operate; state cannot be changed through a toggle_radio request), which is used by drivers to indicate a wireless transmiter was blocked by a hardware rfkill line that accepts no overrides. Keep the old names as #defines, but document them as deprecated. This way, drivers can be converted to the new names *and* verified to actually use rfkill correctly one by one. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
SW_RFKILL_ALL is the "emergency power-off all radios" input event. It must be handled, and must always do the same thing as far as the rfkill system is concerned: all transmitters are to go *immediately* offline. For safety, do NOT allow userspace to override EV_SW SW_RFKILL_ALL OFF. As long as rfkill-input is loaded, that event will *always* be processed, and it will *always* force all rfkill switches to disable all wireless transmitters, regardless of user_claim attribute or anything else. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Fabien Crespel 提交于
The whole current_state thing seems completely useless and a source of problems in rfkill-input, since state comparison is already done in rfkill, and rfkill-input is more than likely to become out of sync with the real state. Signed-off-by: NFabien Crespel <fabien@crespel.net> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Unfortunately, instead of adding a generic Wireless WAN type, a technology- specific type (WiMAX) was added. That's useless for other WWAN devices, such as EDGE, UMTS, X-RTT and other such radios. Add a WWAN rfkill type for generic wireless WAN devices. No keys are added as most devices really want to use KEY_WLAN for WWAN control (in a cycle of none, WLAN, WWAN, WLAN+WWAN) and need no specific keycode added. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Iñaky Pérez-González <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Teach rfkill-input how to handle SW_RFKILL_ALL events (new name for the SW_RADIO event). SW_RFKILL_ALL is an absolute enable-or-disable command that is tied to all radios in a system. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Iñaky Pérez-González 提交于
Teach rfkill about wimax radios. Had to define a KEY_WIMAX as a 'key for disabling only wimax radios', as other radio technologies have. This makes sense as hardware has specific keys for disabling specific radios. The RFKILL enabling part is, otherwise, a copy and paste of any other radio technology. Signed-off-by: NInaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
get rid of input BIT* duplicate defines use newly global defined macros for input layer. Also remove includes of input.h from non-input sources only for BIT macro definiton. Define the macro temporarily in local manner, all those local definitons will be removed further in this patchset (to not break bisecting). BIT macro will be globally defined (1<<x) Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Cc: <dtor@mail.ru> Acked-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: <perex@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: <vernux@us.ibm.com> Cc: <malattia@linux.it> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
rfkill_switch_all shouldn't be called by drivers directly, instead they should send a signal over the input device. To prevent confusion for driver developers, move the function into a rfkill private header. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
This patch will add support for UWB keys to rfkill, support for this has been requested by Inaky. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
-
- 15 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Subject: [patch] net/input: fix net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c bug on 64-bit systems this recent commit: commit cf4328cd Author: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Date: Mon May 7 00:34:20 2007 -0700 [NET]: rfkill: add support for input key to control wireless radio added this 64-bit bug: .... unsigned int flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&task->lock, flags); .... irq 'flags' must be unsigned long, not unsigned int. The -rt tree has strict checks about this on 64-bit so this triggered a build failure. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
The RF kill patch that provides infrastructure for implementing switches controlling radio states on various network and other cards. [dtor@insightbb.com: address review comments] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanups, build fixes] Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-