1. 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] mm: swap write failure fixup · 6ddab3b9
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Currently we can silently drop data if the write to swap failed.  It
      usually doesn't result in data-corruption because on page-in the process
      will receive SIGBUS (assuming write-failure implies read-failure).
      
      This assumption might or might not be valid.
      
      This patch will avoid the page being discarded after a failed write.  But
      will print a warning the sysadmin _should_ take to heart, if a lot of swap
      space becomes un-writeable, OOM is not far off.
      
      Tested by making the write fail 'randomly' once every 50 writes or so.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: printk warning fix]
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6ddab3b9
  2. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 30 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • H
      [PATCH] mm: split page table lock · 4c21e2f2
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      Christoph Lameter demonstrated very poor scalability on the SGI 512-way, with
      a many-threaded application which concurrently initializes different parts of
      a large anonymous area.
      
      This patch corrects that, by using a separate spinlock per page table page, to
      guard the page table entries in that page, instead of using the mm's single
      page_table_lock.  (But even then, page_table_lock is still used to guard page
      table allocation, and anon_vma allocation.)
      
      In this implementation, the spinlock is tucked inside the struct page of the
      page table page: with a BUILD_BUG_ON in case it overflows - which it would in
      the case of 32-bit PA-RISC with spinlock debugging enabled.
      
      Splitting the lock is not quite for free: another cacheline access.  Ideally,
      I suppose we would use split ptlock only for multi-threaded processes on
      multi-cpu machines; but deciding that dynamically would have its own costs.
      So for now enable it by config, at some number of cpus - since the Kconfig
      language doesn't support inequalities, let preprocessor compare that with
      NR_CPUS.  But I don't think it's worth being user-configurable: for good
      testing of both split and unsplit configs, split now at 4 cpus, and perhaps
      change that to 8 later.
      
      There is a benefit even for singly threaded processes: kswapd can be attacking
      one part of the mm while another part is busy faulting.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4c21e2f2
  4. 09 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  5. 26 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  6. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4