- 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This will be later used by powerpc THP support. In powerpc we want to use pgtable for storing the hash index values. So instead of adding them to mm_context list, we would like to store them in the second half of pmd Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 25 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
As reported by Dave Kleikamp, when we emit cross calls to do batched TLB flush processing we have a race because we do not synchronize on the sibling cpus completing the cross call. So meanwhile the TLB batch can be reset (tb->tlb_nr set to zero, etc.) and either flushes are missed or flushes will flush the wrong addresses. Fix this by using generic infrastructure to synchonize on the completion of the cross call. This first required getting the flush_tlb_pending() call out from switch_to() which operates with locks held and interrupts disabled. The problem is that smp_call_function_many() cannot be invoked with IRQs disabled and this is explicitly checked for with WARN_ON_ONCE(). We get the batch processing outside of locked IRQ disabled sections by using some ideas from the powerpc port. Namely, we only batch inside of arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode() calls. If we're not in such a region, we flush TLBs synchronously. 1) Get rid of xcall_flush_tlb_pending and per-cpu type implementations. 2) Do TLB batch cross calls instead via: smp_call_function_many() tlb_pending_func() __flush_tlb_pending() 3) Batch only in lazy mmu sequences: a) Add 'active' member to struct tlb_batch b) Define __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE c) Set 'active' in arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() d) Run batch and clear 'active' in arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() e) Check 'active' in tlb_batch_add_one() and do a synchronous flush if it's clear. 4) Add infrastructure for synchronous TLB page flushes. a) Implement __flush_tlb_page and per-cpu variants, patch as needed. b) Likewise for xcall_flush_tlb_page. c) Implement smp_flush_tlb_page() to invoke the cross-call. d) Wire up global_flush_tlb_page() to the right routine based upon CONFIG_SMP 5) It turns out that singleton batches are very common, 2 out of every 3 batch flushes have only a single entry in them. The batch flush waiting is very expensive, both because of the poll on sibling cpu completeion, as well as because passing the tlb batch pointer to the sibling cpus invokes a shared memory dereference. Therefore, in flush_tlb_pending(), if there is only one entry in the batch perform a completely asynchronous global_flush_tlb_page() instead. Reported-by: NDave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NDave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
If our first THP installation for an MM is via the set_pmd_at() done during khugepaged's collapsing we'll end up in tsb_grow() trying to do a GFP_KERNEL allocation with several locks held. Simply using GFP_ATOMIC in this situation is not the best option because we really can't have this fail, so we'd really like to keep this an order 0 GFP_KERNEL allocation if possible. Also, doing the TSB allocation from khugepaged is a really bad idea because we'll allocate it potentially from the wrong NUMA node in that context. So what we do is defer the hugepage TSB allocation until the first TLB miss we take on a hugepage. This is slightly tricky because we have to handle two unusual cases: 1) Taking the first hugepage TLB miss in the window trap handler. We'll call the winfix_trampoline when that is detected. 2) An initial TSB allocation via TLB miss races with a hugetlb fault on another cpu running the same MM. We handle this by unconditionally loading the TSB we see into the current cpu even if it's non-NULL at hugetlb_setup time. Reported-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@ut.ee> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Miller 提交于
This is relatively easy since PMD's now cover exactly 4MB of memory. Our PMD entries are 32-bits each, so we use a special encoding. The lowest bit, PMD_ISHUGE, determines the interpretation. This is possible because sparc64's page tables are purely software entities so we can use whatever encoding scheme we want. We just have to make the TLB miss assembler page table walkers aware of the layout. set_pmd_at() works much like set_pte_at() but it has to operate in two page from a table of non-huge PTEs, so we have to queue up TLB flushes based upon what mappings are valid in the PTE table. In the second regime we are going from huge-page to non-huge-page, and in that case we need only queue up a single TLB flush to push out the huge page mapping. We still have 5 bits remaining in the huge PMD encoding so we can very likely support any new pieces of THP state tracking that might get added in the future. With lots of help from Johannes Weiner. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Rework the sparc mmu_gather usage to conform to the new world order :-) Sparc mmu_gather does two things: - tracks vaddrs to unhash - tracks pages to free Split these two things like powerpc has done and keep the vaddrs in per-cpu data structures and flush them on context switch. The remaining bits can then use the generic mmu_gather. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
- move all sparc64/mm/ files to arch/sparc/mm/ - commonly named files are named _64.c - add files to sparc/mm/Makefile preserving link order - delete now unused sparc64/mm/Makefile - sparc64 now finds mm/ in sparc Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This was just needed to work around an ancient gcc bug that we don't care about any more. It was also causing a sparse warnings: arch/sparc64/mm/tlb.c:22:52: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Noticed by Andrew Morton. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported by Mariusz Kozlowski. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
A context switch will force a call to flush_tlb_pending() (via switch_to()), so if we test tlb_nr to be non-zero, then sleep, it would become zero and later back at the original context we'll pass zero down into the TLB flushing code which should never see a nr argument of zero. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 3月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
It is totally wasted work, since we have no D-cache aliasing issues on sun4v. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
We now use the TSB hardware assist features of the UltraSPARC MMUs. SMP is currently knowingly broken, we need to find another place to store the per-cpu base pointers. We hid them away in the TSB base register, and that obviously will not work any more :-) Another known broken case is non-8KB base page size. Also noticed that flush_tlb_all() is not referenced anywhere, only the internal __flush_tlb_all() (local cpu only) is used by the sparc64 port, so we can get rid of flush_tlb_all(). The kernel gets it's own 8KB TSB (swapper_tsb) and each address space gets it's own private 8K TSB. Later we can add code to dynamically increase the size of per-process TSB as the RSS grows. An 8KB TSB is good enough for up to about a 4MB RSS, after which the TSB starts to incur many capacity and conflict misses. We even accumulate OBP translations into the kernel TSB. Another area for refinement is large page size support. We could use a secondary address space TSB to handle those. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 10月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
zap_pte_range has been counting the pages it frees in tlb->freed, then tlb_finish_mmu has used that to update the mm's rss. That got stranger when I added anon_rss, yet updated it by a different route; and stranger when rss and anon_rss became mm_counters with special access macros. And it would no longer be viable if we're relying on page_table_lock to stabilize the mm_counter, but calling tlb_finish_mmu outside that lock. Remove the mmu_gather's freed field, let tlb_finish_mmu stick to its own business, just decrement the rss mm_counter in zap_pte_range (yes, there was some point to batching the update, and a subsequent patch restores that). And forget the anal paranoia of first reading the counter to avoid going negative - if rss does go negative, just fix that bug. Remove the mmu_gather's flushes and avoided_flushes from arm and arm26: no use was being made of them. But arm26 alone was actually using the freed, in the way some others use need_flush: give it a need_flush. arm26 seems to prefer spaces to tabs here: respect that. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
tlb_is_full_mm? What does that mean? The TLB is full? No, it means that the mm's last user has gone and the whole mm is being torn down. And it's an inline function because sparc64 uses a different (slightly better) "tlb_frozen" name for the flag others call "fullmm". And now the ptep_get_and_clear_full macro used in zap_pte_range refers directly to tlb->fullmm, which would be wrong for sparc64. Rather than correct that, I'd prefer to scrap tlb_is_full_mm altogether, and change sparc64 to just use the same poor name as everyone else - is that okay? Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-