1. 01 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  2. 03 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • B
      Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+" · c4ae25ec
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      This reverts commit 03752f5b.
      
      This revert requires a bit of explanation on how I understand things
      work. Internally the architects/designers decide how the stolen encoding
      works. We put it in a doc. BIOS writers take these docs and implement
      it. Driver writers read the doc too, and read the value left by the BIOS
      writers, and then we make magic.
      
      The failing here is that in the docs we had[1] contained two different
      definitions for this register for Gen7. (We have both a PCI register,
      and an MMIO, and each of these were different). At the time [2] of
      03752f5b, we asked the architects what the correct value should be; but
      that doesn't match the reality (BIOS) unfortunately.
      
      So on all machines I can get my hands on, this revert is the right thing
      to do. I've also worked with the product group to confirm that they
      agree this revert is what we should do. People using HW made my "people"
      who both write their own BIOS, and have access to our docs (Apple?).
      Investigations are still ongoing about whether we need to add a list
      of machines needing special handling, but this patch should be the
      right thing for pretty much everyone.
      
      [1] The docs are still wrong on this one. Now instead of two registers with
      two definitions, we have one register with BOTH definitions, progress?
      [2] The open source PRMs have the "wrong" definitions in chapter Volume
      1 part6, section 1.1.12.
      
      This digging was inspired by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      [danvet: Augment the patch saying that it's still a bit unclear
      whether there are any machines out there with "wrong" firmware and
      whether we need to add a list to handle them specially.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c4ae25ec
  4. 06 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 27 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Z
      drm/i915: correct the calculation of first_pd_entry_in_global_pt · 43b27290
      Zhang, Xiong Y 提交于
      When ppgtt is enabled, dev_priv->gtt.total has excluded the gtt space
      occupied by ppgtt table in i915_gem_init_global_gtt() function. So the
      calculation of first_pd_entry_in_global_pt doesn't need to subtract
      I915_PPGTT_PD_ENTRIES again. Or else PPGTT directory table will be
      destroyed by global gtt allocation.
      
      This regression has been introduced in
      
      commit a54c0c27
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Thu Jan 24 14:45:00 2013 -0800
      
          drm/i915: remove intel_gtt structure
      
      The breakage is pretty subtile since the old gtt_total_entries
      included the pde range, whereas the new on did not.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang<xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>
      [danvet: Add regression citation and cc: stable. Thanks to Chris for
      correcting my wrong guess about which commit broke things.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      43b27290
  6. 22 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  7. 18 4月, 2013 13 次提交
  8. 28 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 23 3月, 2013 3 次提交
  10. 07 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 15 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 31 1月, 2013 8 次提交
  13. 20 1月, 2013 2 次提交
    • B
      drm/i915: Needs_dmar, not · 8d2e6308
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The reasoning behind our code taking two paths depending upon whether or
      not we may have been configured for IOMMU isn't clear to me. It should
      always be safe to use the pci mapping functions as they are designed to
      abstract the decision we were handling in i915.
      
      Aside from simpler code, removing another member for the intel_gtt
      struct is a nice motivation.
      
      I ran this by Chris, and he wasn't concerned about the extra kzalloc,
      and memory references vs. page_to_phys calculation in the case without
      IOMMU.
      
      v2: Update commit message
      
      v3: Remove needs_dmar addition from Zhenyu upstream
      
      This reverts (and then other stuff)
      commit 20652097
      Author: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
      Date:   Thu Dec 13 23:47:47 2012 +0800
      
          drm/i915: Fix missed needs_dmar setting
      
      Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> (v2)
      Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: Squash in follow-up fix to remove the bogus hunk which
      deleted the dma_mask configuration for gen6+.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      8d2e6308
    • B
      drm/i915: Remove scratch page from shared · 9c61a32d
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      We already had a mapping in both (minus the phys_addr in AGP).
      Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      9c61a32d