1. 28 1月, 2017 20 次提交
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename update_e820() to e820__update_table() · 6464d294
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      update_e820() should have 'e820' as a prefix as most of the other E820
      functions have - but it's also a bit unclear about its purpose, as
      it's unclear what is updated - the whole table, or an entry?
      
      Also, the name does not express that it's a trivial wrapper
      around sanitize_e820_table() that also prints out the resulting
      table.
      
      So rename it to e820__update_table_print(). This also makes it
      harmonize with the e820__update_table_firmware() function which
      has a very similar purpose.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6464d294
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename early_reserve_e820() to e820__memblock_alloc() and document it · 5da217ca
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      early_reserve_e820() is an early hack for kexec that does a limited fixup of the
      mptable and passes it to the kexec kernel as if it was the real thing.
      
      For this it needs to allocate memory - but no memory allocator is available yet
      beyond the memblock allocator, so early_reserve_e820() is really a wrapper
      around memblock_alloc() plus a hack to update the e820_table_firmware entries.
      
      The name 'reserve' is really a bit of a misnomer, as 'reserved' memory typically
      means memory completely inaccessible to the kernel - while here what we want to do
      is a special RAM allocation for our own purposes and insert that as RAM_RESERVED.
      
      Rename the function to e820__memblock_alloc_reserved() to better signal this dual
      purpose, plus document it better, which was omitted when it was merged. The barely
      comprehensible and cryptic comment:
      
        /*
         * pre allocated 4k and reserved it in memblock and e820_table_firmware
         */
        u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
      
      ... does not count as documentation, replace it with:
      
        /*
         * Allocate the requested number of bytes with the requsted alignment
         * and return (the physical address) to the caller. Also register this
         * range in the 'firmware' E820 table.
         *
         * This allows kexec to fake a new mptable, as if it came from the real
         * system.
         */
        u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5da217ca
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Clarify the role of finish_e820_parsing() and rename it to... · 9641bdaf
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      x86/boot/e820: Clarify the role of finish_e820_parsing() and rename it to e820__finish_early_params()
      
      finish_e820_parsing() is closely related to parse_early_params(), but the
      name does not tell us this clearly, so rename it to e820__finish_early_params().
      
      Also add a few comments to explain what the function does.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9641bdaf
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Move e820_reserve_setup_data() to e820.c · da92139b
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The e820_reserve_setup_data() is local to arch/x86/kernel/setup.c,
      but it is E820 functionality - so move it to e820.c to better
      isolate E820 functionality.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      da92139b
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename parse_e820_ext() to e820__memory_setup_extended() · 914053c0
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      parse_e820_ext() is very similar to e820__memory_setup_default(), both are
      taking bootloader provided data, add it to the E820 table and then
      pass it sanitize_e820_table().
      
      Rename it to e820__memory_setup_extended() to better signal their similar role.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      914053c0
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Move the memblock_find_dma_reserve() function and rename it to... · 4270fd8b
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      x86/boot/e820: Move the memblock_find_dma_reserve() function and rename it to memblock_set_dma_reserve()
      
      We introduced memblock_find_dma_reserve() in this commit:
      
         6f2a7536 x86, memblock: Use memblock_memory_size()/memblock_free_memory_size() to get correct dma_reserve
      
      But there's several problems with it:
      
       - The changelog is full of typos and is incomprehensible in general, and
         the comments in the code are not much better either.
      
       - The function was inexplicably placed into e820.c, while it has very
         little connection to the E820 table: when we call
         memblock_find_dma_reserve() then memblock is already set up and we
         are not using the E820 table anymore.
      
       - The function is a wrapper around set_dma_reserve(), but changed the 'set'
         name to 'find' - actively misleading about its primary purpose, which is
         still to set the DMA-reserve value.
      
       - The function is limited to 64-bit systems, but neither the changelog nor
         the comments explain why. The change would appear to be relevant to
         32-bit systems as well, as the ISA DMA zone is the first 16 MB of RAM.
      
      So address some of these problems:
      
       - Move it into arch/x86/mm/init.c, next to the other zone setup related
         functions.
      
       - Clean up the code flow and names of local variables a bit.
      
       - Rename it to memblock_set_dma_reserve()
      
       - Improve the comments.
      
      No change in functionality. Enabling it for 32-bit systems is left
      for a separate patch.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4270fd8b
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename memblock_x86_fill() to e820__memblock_setup() and improve the explanations · 4918e228
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So memblock_x86_fill() is another E820 code misnomer:
      
       - nothing in its name tells us that it's part of the E820 subsystem ...
      
       - The 'fill' wording is ambiguous and doesn't tell us whether it's a single
         entry or some process - while the _real_ purpose of the function is hidden,
         which is to do a complete setup of the (platform independent) memblock regions.
      
      So rename it accordingly, to e820__memblock_setup().
      
      Also translate this incomprehensible and misleading comment:
      
              /*
      	 * EFI may have more than 128 entries
      	 * We are safe to enable resizing, beause memblock_x86_fill()
      	 * is rather later for x86
      	 */
              memblock_allow_resize();
      
      The worst aspect of this comment isn't even the sloppy typos, but that it
      casually mentions a '128' number with no explanation, which makes one lead
      to the assumption that this is related to the well-known limit of a maximum
      of 128 E820 entries passed via legacy bootloaders.
      
      But no, the _real_ meaning of 128 here is that of the memblock subsystem,
      which too happens to have a 128 entries limit for very early memblock
      regions (which is unrelated to E820), via INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS ...
      
      So change the comment to a more comprehensible version:
      
              /*
               * The bootstrap memblock region count maximum is 128 entries
               * (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS), but EFI might pass us more E820 entries
               * than that - so allow memblock resizing.
               *
               * This is safe, because this call happens pretty late during x86 setup,
               * so we know about reserved memory regions already. (This is important
               * so that memblock resizing does no stomp over reserved areas.)
               */
              memblock_allow_resize();
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4918e228
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename e820_table_saved to e820_table_firmware and improve the description · 544a0f47
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So the 'e820_table_saved' is a bit of a misnomer that hides its real purpose.
      
      At first sight the name suggests that it's some sort save/restore mechanism,
      as this is how we typically name such facilities in the kernel.
      
      But that is not so, e820_table_saved is the original firmware version of the
      e820 table, not modified by the kernel. This table is displayed in the
      /sys/firmware/memmap file, and it's also used by the hibernation code to
      calculate a physical memory layout MD5 fingerprint checksum which is
      invariant of the kernel.
      
      So rename it to 'e820_table_firmware' and update all the comments to better
      describe the main e820 data strutures.
      
      Also rename:
      
        'initial_e820_table_saved'  =>  'e820_table_firmware_init'
        'e820_update_range_saved'   =>  'e820_update_range_firmware'
      
      ... to better match the new nomenclature.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      544a0f47
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename default_machine_specific_memory_setup() to e820__memory_setup_default() · 103e2063
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The default_machine_specific_memory_setup() is a mouthful and despite the
      many words it doesn't actually tell us clearly what it does.
      
      The function is the x86 legacy memory layout setup code, based on
      E820-formatted memory layout information passed by the bootloader
      via the boot_params.
      
      Rename it to e820__memory_setup_default() to better signal its purpose.
      
      Also rename the related higher level function to be consistent with
      this new naming:
      
          setup_memory_map() => e820__memory_setup()
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      103e2063
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename everything to e820_table · 61a50101
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      61a50101
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename 'e820_map' variables to 'e820_array' · acd4c048
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      In line with the rename to 'struct e820_array', harmonize the naming of common e820
      table variable names as well:
      
       e820          =>  e820_array
       e820_saved    =>  e820_array_saved
       e820_map      =>  e820_array
       initial_e820  =>  e820_array_init
      
      This makes the variable names more consistent  and easier to grep for.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      acd4c048
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Remove e820_mark_nosave_regions() definition uglies · e79d74d0
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The e820_mark_nosave_regions definition has a number of ugly #ifdef
      conditions that unnecessarily uglify both the header and the
      e820.c file.
      
      Make this function unconditional: most distro kernels have hibernation
      enabled. If LTO functionality is added in the future it will be able
      to eliminate unused functions without uglifying the source code.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      e79d74d0
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Remove unnecessary #include <linux/ioport.h> from asm/e820/api.h · 9de94dbb
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      There's a completely unnecessary inclusion of linux/ioport.h near
      the end of the asm/e820/api.h file.
      
      Remove it and fix up unrelated code that learned to rely on this
      spurious inclusion of a generic header.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9de94dbb
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Rename the basic e820 data types to 'struct e820_entry' and 'struct e820_array' · 8ec67d97
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The 'e820entry' and 'e820map' names have various annoyances:
      
       - the missing underscore departs from the usual kernel style
         and makes the code look weird,
      
       - in the past I kept confusing the 'map' with the 'entry', because
         a 'map' is ambiguous in that regard,
      
       - it's not really clear from the 'e820map' that this is a regular
         C array.
      
      Rename them to 'struct e820_entry' and 'struct e820_array' accordingly.
      
      ( Leave the legacy UAPI header alone but do the rename in the bootparam.h
        and e820/types.h file - outside tools relying on these defines should
        either adjust their code, or should use the legacy header, or should
        create their private copies for the definitions. )
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      8ec67d97
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Move HIGH_MEMORY define to asm/e820/types.h · 308bee69
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The HIGH_MEMORY define was in the API header, while it conceptually
      belongs to the other physical memory ranges in the e820/types.h
      header.
      
      Move it there - and also convert the 1MB address to hexa, so that
      it lines up more nicely with the other memory address values.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      308bee69
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Remove unnecessary __ASSEMBLY__ guard · 993f4b77
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      asm/e820/api.h had a spurious __ASSEMBLY__ guard - but the
      API header is not included in any assembly files. Remove it.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      993f4b77
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Clean up asm/e820/api.h · 0f856508
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Do a number of easy cleanups:
      
       - remove spurious linebreaks
      
       - remove spurious whitespace differences and inconsistent tabulation
      
       - remove unused and ugly 'struct setup_data;' pre-declaration
      
       - make all exported functionality 'extern' consistently
      
       - deobfuscate the (s,e) parameters of is_ISA_range(): (start, end)
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      0f856508
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Clean up the E820_X_MAX definition · 7b6e4ba3
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      E820_X_MAX is defined in a somewhat messy fashion:
      
       - there's a pretty pointless looking #ifndef __KERNEL__ define that
         makes no sense in the non-UAPI header anymore,
      
       - part of it is defined in api.h, which is not for type definitions,
      
       - plus it's defined in two headers and the main explanation is in the
         header where we don't have the real definition.
      
      So move it into a single place in e820/types.h and get rid of the
      !__KERNEL__ case altogether. Drop the smaller comment - the larger
      one explains it just fine.
      
      Note that the zeropage does not use E820_X_MAX, it uses the legacy
      128 entries definition.
      
      No change in functionality.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      7b6e4ba3
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Move asm/e820.h to asm/e820/api.h · 66441bd3
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      In line with asm/e820/types.h, move the e820 API declarations to
      asm/e820/api.h and update all usage sites.
      
      This is just a mechanical, obviously correct move & replace patch,
      there will be subsequent changes to clean up the code and to make
      better use of the new header organization.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      66441bd3
    • I
      x86/boot/e820: Introduce arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h · 70a9d818
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      First baby steps towards saner e820 headers: create an exact copy of
      arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/e820.h and use it from the asm/e820.h file.
      
      No other changes - this is done to decouple the code from UAPI headers,
      plus to make sure that subsequent modifications to the file can be more
      clearly seen.
      
      The plan is to keep the old UAPI header in place but the kernel won't
      use it anymore - and after some time we'll try to remove it. (User-space
      tools better have local copies of headers anyway, instead of relying
      on kernel headers.)
      
      This gives the kernel the freedom to reorganize the e820 code.
      
      Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
      Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      70a9d818
  2. 28 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 09 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 21 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 15 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • V
      mm: move memtest under mm · 4a20799d
      Vladimir Murzin 提交于
      Memtest is a simple feature which fills the memory with a given set of
      patterns and validates memory contents, if bad memory regions is detected
      it reserves them via memblock API.  Since memblock API is widely used by
      other architectures this feature can be enabled outside of x86 world.
      
      This patch set promotes memtest to live under generic mm umbrella and
      enables memtest feature for arm/arm64.
      
      It was reported that this patch set was useful for tracking down an issue
      with some errant DMA on an arm64 platform.
      
      This patch (of 6):
      
      There is nothing platform dependent in the core memtest code, so other
      platforms might benefit from this feature too.
      
      [linux@roeck-us.net: MEMTEST depends on MEMBLOCK]
      Signed-off-by: NVladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
      Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Tested-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4a20799d
  6. 14 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 15 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 13 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 09 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed address is invalid · e8c71062
      Matt Fleming 提交于
      If we encounter an efi_memory_desc_t without EFI_MEMORY_WB set
      in ->attribute we currently call set_memory_uc(), which in turn
      calls __pa() on a potentially ioremap'd address.
      
      On CONFIG_X86_32 this is invalid, resulting in the following
      oops on some machines:
      
        BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at f7f22280
        IP: [<c10257b9>] reserve_ram_pages_type+0x89/0x210
        [...]
      
        Call Trace:
         [<c104f8ca>] ? page_is_ram+0x1a/0x40
         [<c1025aff>] reserve_memtype+0xdf/0x2f0
         [<c1024dc9>] set_memory_uc+0x49/0xa0
         [<c19334d0>] efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x1c2/0x3aa
         [<c19216d4>] start_kernel+0x291/0x2f2
         [<c19211c7>] ? loglevel+0x1b/0x1b
         [<c19210bf>] i386_start_kernel+0xbf/0xc8
      
      A better approach to this problem is to map the memory region
      with the correct attributes from the start, instead of modifying
      it after the fact. The uncached case can be handled by
      ioremap_nocache() and the cached by ioremap_cache().
      
      Despite first impressions, it's not possible to use
      ioremap_cache() to map all cached memory regions on
      CONFIG_X86_64 because EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA regions really
      don't like being mapped into the vmalloc space, as detailed in
      the following bug report,
      
      	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748516
      
      Therefore, we need to ensure that any EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
      regions are covered by the direct kernel mapping table on
      CONFIG_X86_64. To accomplish this we now map E820_RESERVED_EFI
      regions via the direct kernel mapping with the initial call to
      init_memory_mapping() in setup_arch(), whereas previously these
      regions wouldn't be mapped if they were after the last E820_RAM
      region until efi_ioremap() was called. Doing it this way allows
      us to delete efi_ioremap() completely.
      Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
      Cc: Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1321621751-3650-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e8c71062
  10. 15 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 24 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 18 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 28 8月, 2010 3 次提交
    • Y
      x86, memblock: Use memblock_memory_size()/memblock_free_memory_size() to get correct dma_reserve · 6f2a7536
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      memblock_memory_size() will return memory size in memblock.memory.region.
      memblock_free_memory_size() will return free memory size in memblock.memory.region.
      
      So We can get exact reseved size in specified range.
      
      Set the size right after initmem_init(), because later bootmem API will
      get area above 16M. (except some fallback).
      
      Later after we remove the bootmem, We could call that just before paging_init().
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      6f2a7536
    • Y
      x86: Remove not used early_res code · a587d2da
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      and some functions in e820.c that are not used anymore
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      a587d2da
    • Y
      x86: Use memblock to replace early_res · 72d7c3b3
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
      2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
      3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
      4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
      5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
         replace them all
      6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
      7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
         so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
         -- corruption_check and mptable_update
      
      -v2: Move reserve_brk() early
          Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
          that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
          memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
          memblock.memory.region array.
          and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
          So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
      -v3: Move find_smp_config early
          To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
          in right place.
      -v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
          memblock.reserved already..
          use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
      -v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
          active_region for 32bit does include high pages
          need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
      -v6: Use current_limit instead
      -v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
      -v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
      -v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline
      Suggested-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Suggested-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      72d7c3b3
  14. 20 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 13 2月, 2010 3 次提交
  17. 01 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • H
      x86, mm: Correct the implementation of is_untracked_pat_range() · ccef0864
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      The semantics the PAT code expect of is_untracked_pat_range() is "is
      this range completely contained inside the untracked region."  This
      means that checkin 8a271389 was
      technically wrong, because the implementation needlessly confusing.
      
      The sane interface is for it to take a semiclosed range like just
      about everything else (as evidenced by the sheer number of "- 1"'s
      removed by that patch) so change the actual implementation to match.
      Reported-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>
      ccef0864