1. 13 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness · 5fbd036b
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Stepan found:
      
      CPU0		CPUn
      
      _cpu_up()
        __cpu_up()
      
      		boostrap()
      		  notify_cpu_starting()
      		  set_cpu_online()
      		  while (!cpu_active())
      		    cpu_relax()
      
      <PREEMPT-out>
      
      smp_call_function(.wait=1)
        /* we find cpu_online() is true */
        arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask()
      
        /* wait-forever-more */
      
      <PREEMPT-in>
      		  local_irq_enable()
      
        cpu_notify(CPU_ONLINE)
          sched_cpu_active()
            set_cpu_active()
      
      Now the purpose of cpu_active is mostly with bringing down a cpu, where
      we mark it !active to avoid the load-balancer from moving tasks to it
      while we tear down the cpu. This is required because we only update the
      sched_domain tree after we brought the cpu-down. And this is needed so
      that some tasks can still run while we bring it down, we just don't want
      new tasks to appear.
      
      On cpu-up however the sched_domain tree doesn't yet include the new cpu,
      so its invisible to the load-balancer, regardless of the active state.
      So instead of setting the active state after we boot the new cpu (and
      consequently having to wait for it before enabling interrupts) set the
      cpu active before we set it online and avoid the whole mess.
      Reported-by: NStepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323965362.18942.71.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      5fbd036b
  2. 01 3月, 2012 6 次提交
  3. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      sched/events: Revert trace_sched_stat_sleeptime() · 8c79a045
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Commit 1ac9bc69 ("sched/tracing: Add a new tracepoint for sleeptime")
      added a new sched:sched_stat_sleeptime tracepoint.
      
      It's broken: the first sample we get on a task might be bad because
      of a stale sleep_start value that wasn't reset at the last task switch
      because the tracepoint was not active.
      
      It also breaks the existing schedstat samples due to the side
      effects of:
      
      -               se->statistics.sleep_start = 0;
      ...
      -               se->statistics.block_start = 0;
      
      Nor do I see means to fix it without adding overhead to the scheduler
      fast path, which I'm not willing to for the sake of redundant
      instrumentation.
      
      Most importantly, sleep time information can already be constructed
      by tracing context switches and wakeups, and taking the timestamp
      difference between the schedule-out, the wakeup and the schedule-in.
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Andrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-pc4c9qhl8q6vg3bs4j6k0rbd@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8c79a045
  4. 27 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 10 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 24 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 23 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 21 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 16 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 07 12月, 2011 4 次提交
  11. 06 12月, 2011 6 次提交
  12. 17 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 16 11月, 2011 3 次提交
  14. 14 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  15. 06 10月, 2011 5 次提交
  16. 04 10月, 2011 1 次提交