1. 24 11月, 2017 4 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Add a timeout for detecting lost ACKs/lost DATA · bd1fdf8c
      David Howells 提交于
      Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that
      has the request-ack flag set.  This allows us to detect if we don't get an
      ACK in response to the latest flagged packet.
      
      The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within
      2*RTT of the transmission.
      
      If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out
      the state of the other side.  If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner,
      we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that
      instead.
      
      If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what
      we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA
      packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have
      been lost and retransmit immediately.
      
      Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and
      speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set.  It should result in
      either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the
      a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      bd1fdf8c
    • D
      rxrpc: Don't transmit DELAY ACKs immediately on proposal · 8637abaa
      David Howells 提交于
      Don't transmit a DELAY ACK immediately on proposal when the Rx window is
      rotated, but rather defer it to the work function.  This means that we have
      a chance to queue/consume more received packets before we actually send the
      DELAY ACK, or even cancel it entirely, thereby reducing the number of
      packets transmitted.
      
      We do, however, want to continue sending other types of packet immediately,
      particularly REQUESTED ACKs, as they may be used for RTT calculation by the
      other side.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      8637abaa
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix call timeouts · a158bdd3
      David Howells 提交于
      Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from
      userspace.  By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three
      timeouts:
      
       (1) "Normal timeout"
      
           This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any
           packets from the peer in a while.  It is measured from the last time
           we received any packet on that call.  This is not reset by any
           connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets).
      
           If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate
           PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal
           timeout so is to keep both sides alive.  This is set at 1/6 of normal
           timeout.
      
       (2) "Idle timeout"
      
           This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop
           receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data.  It is
           measured from the last time we received a DATA packet.
      
       (3) "Hard timeout"
      
           This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that
           call.  It should not be specified by default.  Some operations (such
           as volume transfer) take a long time.
      
      Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a
      control message:
      
      	RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS
      
      The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need
      be given:
      
      	u32 hard_timeout;	/* sec from first packet */
      	u32 idle_timeout;	/* msec from packet Rx */
      	u32 normal_timeout;	/* msec from data Rx */
      
      This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a
      call.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      a158bdd3
    • D
      rxrpc: Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client call · 3136ef49
      David Howells 提交于
      Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client call by deferring it to the
      connection processor.  This allows it to be skipped if we can send the next
      call instead, the first DATA packet of which will implicitly ack this call.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      3136ef49
  2. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Lock around calling a kernel service Rx notification · 20acbd9a
      David Howells 提交于
      Place a spinlock around the invocation of call->notify_rx() for a kernel
      service call and lock again when ending the call and replace the
      notification pointer with a pointer to a dummy function.
      
      This is required because it's possible for rxrpc_notify_socket() to be
      called after the call has been ended by the kernel service if called from
      the asynchronous work function rxrpc_process_call().
      
      However, rxrpc_notify_socket() currently only holds the RCU read lock when
      invoking ->notify_rx(), which means that the afs_call struct would need to
      be disposed of by call_rcu() rather than by kfree().
      
      But we shouldn't see any notifications from a call after calling
      rxrpc_kernel_end_call(), so a lock is required in rxrpc code.
      
      Without this, we may see the call wait queue as having a corrupt spinlock:
      
          BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/0:2/1612
          general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
          ...
          Workqueue: krxrpcd rxrpc_process_call
          task: ffff88040b83c400 task.stack: ffff88040adfc000
          RIP: 0010:spin_bug+0x161/0x18f
          RSP: 0018:ffff88040adffcc0 EFLAGS: 00010002
          RAX: 0000000000000032 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: ffffffff81ab16cf
          RDX: ffff88041fa14c01 RSI: ffff88041fa0ccb8 RDI: ffff88041fa0ccb8
          RBP: ffff88040adffcd8 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 00000000ffffffff
          R10: ffff88040adffc60 R11: 000000000000022c R12: ffff88040aca2208
          R13: ffffffff81a58114 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
          ....
          Call Trace:
           do_raw_spin_lock+0x1d/0x89
           _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x49
           ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7
           __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7
           ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a
           __wake_up+0xe/0x10
           afs_wake_up_call_waiter+0x11b/0x122 [kafs]
           rxrpc_notify_socket+0x12b/0x258
           rxrpc_process_call+0x18e/0x7d0
           process_one_work+0x298/0x4de
           ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280
           worker_thread+0x1d1/0x2ae
           ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280
           kthread+0x12c/0x134
           ? kthread_create_on_node+0x3a/0x3a
           ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
      
      In this case, note the corrupt data in EBX.  The address of the offending
      afs_call is in R12, plus the offset to the spinlock.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      20acbd9a
  3. 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Separate the connection's protocol service ID from the lookup ID · 68d6d1ae
      David Howells 提交于
      Keep the rxrpc_connection struct's idea of the service ID that is exposed
      in the protocol separate from the service ID that's used as a lookup key.
      
      This allows the protocol service ID on a client connection to get upgraded
      without making the connection unfindable for other client calls that also
      would like to use the upgraded connection.
      
      The connection's actual service ID is then returned through recvmsg() by
      way of msg_name.
      
      Whilst we're at it, we get rid of the last_service_id field from each
      channel.  The service ID is per-connection, not per-call and an entire
      connection is upgraded in one go.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      68d6d1ae
  5. 06 4月, 2017 2 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Trace protocol errors in received packets · fb46f6ee
      David Howells 提交于
      Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received
      packets.  The following changes are made:
      
       (1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a
           call and mark the call aborted.  This is wrapped by
           rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace.
      
       (2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error
           generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter.
      
       (3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually
           managed to abort the call.
      
      Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries
      to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though
      it's not technically a receive event.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      fb46f6ee
    • D
      rxrpc: Use negative error codes in rxrpc_call struct · 3a92789a
      David Howells 提交于
      Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what
      the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent.  We only
      turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      3a92789a
  6. 08 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 02 3月, 2017 2 次提交
    • I
      sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from... · 174cd4b1
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from <linux/sched.h> into <linux/sched/signal.h>
      
      Fix up affected files that include this signal functionality via sched.h.
      Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      174cd4b1
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg · 540b1c48
      David Howells 提交于
      All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised
      by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind,
      rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem:
      
       (1) If a number of calls on the same socket are in the process of
           connection to the same peer, a maximum of four concurrent live calls
           are permitted before further calls need to wait for a slot.
      
       (2) If a call is waiting for a slot, it is deep inside sendmsg() or
           rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() and the entry function is holding the socket
           lock.
      
       (3) sendmsg() and recvmsg() or the in-kernel equivalents are prevented
           from servicing the other calls as they need to take the socket lock to
           do so.
      
       (4) The socket is stuck until a call is aborted and makes its slot
           available to the waiter.
      
      Fix this by:
      
       (1) Provide each call with a mutex ('user_mutex') that arbitrates access
           by the users of rxrpc separately for each specific call.
      
       (2) Make rxrpc_sendmsg() and rxrpc_recvmsg() unlock the socket as soon as
           they've got a call and taken its mutex.
      
           Note that I'm returning EWOULDBLOCK from recvmsg() if MSG_DONTWAIT is
           set but someone else has the lock.  Should I instead only return
           EWOULDBLOCK if there's nothing currently to be done on a socket, and
           sleep in this particular instance because there is something to be
           done, but we appear to be blocked by the interrupt handler doing its
           ping?
      
       (3) Make rxrpc_new_client_call() unlock the socket after allocating a new
           call, locking its user mutex and adding it to the socket's call tree.
           The call is returned locked so that sendmsg() can add data to it
           immediately.
      
           From the moment the call is in the socket tree, it is subject to
           access by sendmsg() and recvmsg() - even if it isn't connected yet.
      
       (4) Lock new service calls in the UDP data_ready handler (in
           rxrpc_new_incoming_call()) because they may already be in the socket's
           tree and the data_ready handler makes them live immediately if a user
           ID has already been preassigned.
      
           Note that the new call is locked before any notifications are sent
           that it is live, so doing mutex_trylock() *ought* to always succeed.
           Userspace is prevented from doing sendmsg() on calls that are in a
           too-early state in rxrpc_do_sendmsg().
      
       (5) Make rxrpc_new_incoming_call() return the call with the user mutex
           held so that a ping can be scheduled immediately under it.
      
           Note that it might be worth moving the ping call into
           rxrpc_new_incoming_call() and then we can drop the mutex there.
      
       (6) Make rxrpc_accept_call() take the lock on the call it is accepting and
           release the socket after adding the call to the socket's tree.  This
           is slightly tricky as we've dequeued the call by that point and have
           to requeue it.
      
           Note that requeuing emits a trace event.
      
       (7) Make rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() take the
           new mutex immediately and don't bother with the socket mutex at all.
      
      This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some
      extent parallelisable.
      
      Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the
      socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in
      other calls because we're waiting for the allocator.
      
      We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within
      the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()).
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      540b1c48
  8. 27 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Kernel calls get stuck in recvmsg · d7e15835
      David Howells 提交于
      Calls made through the in-kernel interface can end up getting stuck because
      of a missed variable update in a loop in rxrpc_recvmsg_data().  The problem
      is like this:
      
       (1) A new packet comes in and doesn't cause a notification to be given to
           the client as there's still another packet in the ring - the
           assumption being that if the client will keep drawing off data until
           the ring is empty.
      
       (2) The client is in rxrpc_recvmsg_data(), inside the big while loop that
           iterates through the packets.  This copies the window pointers into
           variables rather than using the information in the call struct
           because:
      
           (a) MSG_PEEK might be in effect;
      
           (b) we need a barrier after reading call->rx_top to pair with the
           	 barrier in the softirq routine that loads the buffer.
      
       (3) The reading of call->rx_top is done outside of the loop, and top is
           never updated whilst we're in the loop.  This means that even through
           there's a new packet available, we don't see it and may return -EFAULT
           to the caller - who will happily return to the scheduler and await the
           next notification.
      
       (4) No further notifications are forthcoming until there's an abort as the
           ring isn't empty.
      
      The fix is to move the read of call->rx_top inside the loop - but it needs
      to be done before the condition is checked.
      Reported-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d7e15835
  9. 06 10月, 2016 4 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Need to produce an ACK for service op if op takes a long time · 9749fd2b
      David Howells 提交于
      We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we
      start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected.
      This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its
      resources.
      
      To make this work:
      
       (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to
           the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel
           the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet
           of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase).
      
       (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding
           call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function
           out.
      
       (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      9749fd2b
    • D
      rxrpc: Return negative error code to kernel service · cf69207a
      David Howells 提交于
      In rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(), when we return the error number incurred by a
      failed call, we must negate it before returning it as it's stored as
      positive (that's what we have to pass back to userspace).
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      cf69207a
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix loss of PING RESPONSE ACK production due to PING ACKs · a5af7e1f
      David Howells 提交于
      Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so
      that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE
      ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be
      scheduling transmission of at the same time.
      
      If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting
      for it and refuse to proceed otherwise.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      a5af7e1f
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix warning by splitting rxrpc_send_call_packet() · 26cb02aa
      David Howells 提交于
      Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more
      complicated) from ABORT generation.  This simplifies the code a bit and
      fixes the following warning:
      
      In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0:
      net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet':
      net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
      net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here
      net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
      Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      26cb02aa
  10. 30 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 25 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  12. 23 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 17 9月, 2016 7 次提交
  14. 14 9月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix prealloc refcounting · 3432a757
      David Howells 提交于
      The preallocated call buffer holds a ref on the calls within that buffer.
      The ref was being released in the wrong place - it worked okay for incoming
      calls to the AFS cache manager service, but doesn't work right for incoming
      calls to a userspace service.
      
      Instead of releasing an extra ref service calls in rxrpc_release_call(),
      the ref needs to be released during the acceptance/rejectance process.  To
      this end:
      
       (1) The prealloc ref is now normally released during
           rxrpc_new_incoming_call().
      
       (2) For preallocated kernel API calls, the kernel API's ref needs to be
           released when the call is discarded on socket close.
      
       (3) We shouldn't take a second ref in rxrpc_accept_call().
      
       (4) rxrpc_recvmsg_new_call() needs to get a ref of its own when it adds
           the call to the to_be_accepted socket queue.
      
      In doing (4) above, we would prefer not to put the call's refcount down to
      0 as that entails doing cleanup in softirq context, but it's unlikely as
      there are several refs held elsewhere, at least one of which must be put by
      someone in process context calling rxrpc_release_call().  However, it's not
      a problem if we do have to do that.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      3432a757
    • D
      rxrpc: Requeue call for recvmsg if more data · 33b603fd
      David Howells 提交于
      rxrpc_recvmsg() needs to make sure that the call it has just been
      processing gets requeued for further attention if the buffer has been
      filled and there's more data to be consumed.  The softirq producer only
      queues the call and wakes the socket if it fills the first slot in the
      window, so userspace might end up sleeping forever otherwise, despite there
      being data available.
      
      This is not a problem provided the userspace buffer is big enough or it
      empties the buffer completely before more data comes in.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      33b603fd
  15. 08 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code · 248f219c
      David Howells 提交于
      Rewrite the data and ack handling code such that:
      
       (1) Parsing of received ACK and ABORT packets and the distribution and the
           filing of DATA packets happens entirely within the data_ready context
           called from the UDP socket.  This allows us to process and discard ACK
           and ABORT packets much more quickly (they're no longer stashed on a
           queue for a background thread to process).
      
       (2) We avoid calling skb_clone(), pskb_pull() and pskb_trim().  We instead
           keep track of the offset and length of the content of each packet in
           the sk_buff metadata.  This means we don't do any allocation in the
           receive path.
      
       (3) Jumbo DATA packet parsing is now done in data_ready context.  Rather
           than cloning the packet once for each subpacket and pulling/trimming
           it, we file the packet multiple times with an annotation for each
           indicating which subpacket is there.  From that we can directly
           calculate the offset and length.
      
       (4) A call's receive queue can be accessed without taking locks (memory
           barriers do have to be used, though).
      
       (5) Incoming calls are set up from preallocated resources and immediately
           made live.  They can than have packets queued upon them and ACKs
           generated.  If insufficient resources exist, DATA packet #1 is given a
           BUSY reply and other DATA packets are discarded).
      
       (6) sk_buffs no longer take a ref on their parent call.
      
      To make this work, the following changes are made:
      
       (1) Each call's receive buffer is now a circular buffer of sk_buff
           pointers (rxtx_buffer) rather than a number of sk_buff_heads spread
           between the call and the socket.  This permits each sk_buff to be in
           the buffer multiple times.  The receive buffer is reused for the
           transmit buffer.
      
       (2) A circular buffer of annotations (rxtx_annotations) is kept parallel
           to the data buffer.  Transmission phase annotations indicate whether a
           buffered packet has been ACK'd or not and whether it needs
           retransmission.
      
           Receive phase annotations indicate whether a slot holds a whole packet
           or a jumbo subpacket and, if the latter, which subpacket.  They also
           note whether the packet has been decrypted in place.
      
       (3) DATA packet window tracking is much simplified.  Each phase has just
           two numbers representing the window (rx_hard_ack/rx_top and
           tx_hard_ack/tx_top).
      
           The hard_ack number is the sequence number before base of the window,
           representing the last packet the other side says it has consumed.
           hard_ack starts from 0 and the first packet is sequence number 1.
      
           The top number is the sequence number of the highest-numbered packet
           residing in the buffer.  Packets between hard_ack+1 and top are
           soft-ACK'd to indicate they've been received, but not yet consumed.
      
           Four macros, before(), before_eq(), after() and after_eq() are added
           to compare sequence numbers within the window.  This allows for the
           top of the window to wrap when the hard-ack sequence number gets close
           to the limit.
      
           Two flags, RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST and RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, are added also
           to indicate when rx_top and tx_top point at the packets with the
           LAST_PACKET bit set, indicating the end of the phase.
      
       (4) Calls are queued on the socket 'receive queue' rather than packets.
           This means that we don't need have to invent dummy packets to queue to
           indicate abnormal/terminal states and we don't have to keep metadata
           packets (such as ABORTs) around
      
       (5) The offset and length of a (sub)packet's content are now passed to
           the verify_packet security op.  This is currently expected to decrypt
           the packet in place and validate it.
      
           However, there's now nowhere to store the revised offset and length of
           the actual data within the decrypted blob (there may be a header and
           padding to skip) because an sk_buff may represent multiple packets, so
           a locate_data security op is added to retrieve these details from the
           sk_buff content when needed.
      
       (6) recvmsg() now has to handle jumbo subpackets, where each subpacket is
           individually secured and needs to be individually decrypted.  The code
           to do this is broken out into rxrpc_recvmsg_data() and shared with the
           kernel API.  It now iterates over the call's receive buffer rather
           than walking the socket receive queue.
      
      Additional changes:
      
       (1) The timers are condensed to a single timer that is set for the soonest
           of three timeouts (delayed ACK generation, DATA retransmission and
           call lifespan).
      
       (2) Transmission of ACK and ABORT packets is effected immediately from
           process-context socket ops/kernel API calls that cause them instead of
           them being punted off to a background work item.  The data_ready
           handler still has to defer to the background, though.
      
       (3) A shutdown op is added to the AF_RXRPC socket so that the AFS
           filesystem can shut down the socket and flush its own work items
           before closing the socket to deal with any in-progress service calls.
      
      Future additional changes that will need to be considered:
      
       (1) Make sure that a call doesn't hog the front of the queue by receiving
           data from the network as fast as userspace is consuming it to the
           exclusion of other calls.
      
       (2) Transmit delayed ACKs from within recvmsg() when we've consumed
           sufficiently more packets to avoid the background work item needing to
           run.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      248f219c
  16. 07 9月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Calls shouldn't hold socket refs · 8d94aa38
      David Howells 提交于
      rxrpc calls shouldn't hold refs on the sock struct.  This was done so that
      the socket wouldn't go away whilst the call was in progress, such that the
      call could reach the socket's queues.
      
      However, we can mark the socket as requiring an RCU release and rely on the
      RCU read lock.
      
      To make this work, we do:
      
       (1) rxrpc_release_call() removes the call's call user ID.  This is now
           only called from socket operations and not from the call processor:
      
      	rxrpc_accept_call() / rxrpc_kernel_accept_call()
      	rxrpc_reject_call() / rxrpc_kernel_reject_call()
      	rxrpc_kernel_end_call()
      	rxrpc_release_calls_on_socket()
      	rxrpc_recvmsg()
      
           Though it is also called in the cleanup path of
           rxrpc_accept_incoming_call() before we assign a user ID.
      
       (2) Pass the socket pointer into rxrpc_release_call() rather than getting
           it from the call so that we can get rid of uninitialised calls.
      
       (3) Fix call processor queueing to pass a ref to the work queue and to
           release that ref at the end of the processor function (or to pass it
           back to the work queue if we have to requeue).
      
       (4) Skip out of the call processor function asap if the call is complete
           and don't requeue it if the call is complete.
      
       (5) Clean up the call immediately that the refcount reaches 0 rather than
           trying to defer it.  Actual deallocation is deferred to RCU, however.
      
       (6) Don't hold socket refs for allocated calls.
      
       (7) Use the RCU read lock when queueing a message on a socket and treat
           the call's socket pointer according to RCU rules and check it for
           NULL.
      
           We also need to use the RCU read lock when viewing a call through
           procfs.
      
       (8) Transmit the final ACK/ABORT to a client call in rxrpc_release_call()
           if this hasn't been done yet so that we can then disconnect the call.
           Once the call is disconnected, it won't have any access to the
           connection struct and the UDP socket for the call work processor to be
           able to send the ACK.  Terminal retransmission will be handled by the
           connection processor.
      
       (9) Release all calls immediately on the closing of a socket rather than
           trying to defer this.  Incomplete calls will be aborted.
      
      The call refcount model is much simplified.  Refs are held on the call by:
      
       (1) A socket's user ID tree.
      
       (2) A socket's incoming call secureq and acceptq.
      
       (3) A kernel service that has a call in progress.
      
       (4) A queued call work processor.  We have to take care to put any call
           that we failed to queue.
      
       (5) sk_buffs on a socket's receive queue.  A future patch will get rid of
           this.
      
      Whilst we're at it, we can do:
      
       (1) Get rid of the RXRPC_CALL_EV_RELEASE event.  Release is now done
           entirely from the socket routines and never from the call's processor.
      
       (2) Get rid of the RXRPC_CALL_DEAD state.  Calls now end in the
           RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE state.
      
       (3) Get rid of the rxrpc_call::destroyer work item.  Calls are now torn
           down when their refcount reaches 0 and then handed over to RCU for
           final cleanup.
      
       (4) Get rid of the rxrpc_call::deadspan timer.  Calls are cleaned up
           immediately they're finished with and don't hang around.
           Post-completion retransmission is handled by the connection processor
           once the call is disconnected.
      
       (5) Get rid of the dead call expiry setting as there's no longer a timer
           to set.
      
       (6) rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() can just check that the call list is empty.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      8d94aa38
    • D
      rxrpc: Improve the call tracking tracepoint · fff72429
      David Howells 提交于
      Improve the call tracking tracepoint by showing more differentiation
      between some of the put and get events, including:
      
        (1) Getting and putting refs for the socket call user ID tree.
      
        (2) Getting and putting refs for queueing and failing to queue the call
            processor work item.
      
      Note that these aren't necessarily used in this patch, but will be taken
      advantage of in future patches.
      
      An enum is added for the event subtype numbers rather than coding them
      directly as decimal numbers and a table of 3-letter strings is provided
      rather than a sequence of ?: operators.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      fff72429
  17. 02 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Don't expose skbs to in-kernel users [ver #2] · d001648e
      David Howells 提交于
      Don't expose skbs to in-kernel users, such as the AFS filesystem, but
      instead provide a notification hook the indicates that a call needs
      attention and another that indicates that there's a new call to be
      collected.
      
      This makes the following possibilities more achievable:
      
       (1) Call refcounting can be made simpler if skbs don't hold refs to calls.
      
       (2) skbs referring to non-data events will be able to be freed much sooner
           rather than being queued for AFS to pick up as rxrpc_kernel_recv_data
           will be able to consult the call state.
      
       (3) We can shortcut the receive phase when a call is remotely aborted
           because we don't have to go through all the packets to get to the one
           cancelling the operation.
      
       (4) It makes it easier to do encryption/decryption directly between AFS's
           buffers and sk_buffs.
      
       (5) Encryption/decryption can more easily be done in the AFS's thread
           contexts - usually that of the userspace process that issued a syscall
           - rather than in one of rxrpc's background threads on a workqueue.
      
       (6) AFS will be able to wait synchronously on a call inside AF_RXRPC.
      
      To make this work, the following interface function has been added:
      
           int rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(
      		struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
      		void *buffer, size_t bufsize, size_t *_offset,
      		bool want_more, u32 *_abort_code);
      
      This is the recvmsg equivalent.  It allows the caller to find out about the
      state of a specific call and to transfer received data into a buffer
      piecemeal.
      
      afs_extract_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() now do all the extraction
      logic between them.  They don't wait synchronously yet because the socket
      lock needs to be dealt with.
      
      Five interface functions have been removed:
      
      	rxrpc_kernel_is_data_last()
          	rxrpc_kernel_get_abort_code()
          	rxrpc_kernel_get_error_number()
          	rxrpc_kernel_free_skb()
          	rxrpc_kernel_data_consumed()
      
      As a temporary hack, sk_buffs going to an in-kernel call are queued on the
      rxrpc_call struct (->knlrecv_queue) rather than being handed over to the
      in-kernel user.  To process the queue internally, a temporary function,
      temp_deliver_data() has been added.  This will be replaced with common code
      between the rxrpc_recvmsg() path and the kernel_rxrpc_recv_data() path in a
      future patch.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d001648e
  18. 30 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 23 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 06 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix races between skb free, ACK generation and replying · 372ee163
      David Howells 提交于
      Inside the kafs filesystem it is possible to occasionally have a call
      processed and terminated before we've had a chance to check whether we need
      to clean up the rx queue for that call because afs_send_simple_reply() ends
      the call when it is done, but this is done in a workqueue item that might
      happen to run to completion before afs_deliver_to_call() completes.
      
      Further, it is possible for rxrpc_kernel_send_data() to be called to send a
      reply before the last request-phase data skb is released.  The rxrpc skb
      destructor is where the ACK processing is done and the call state is
      advanced upon release of the last skb.  ACK generation is also deferred to
      a work item because it's possible that the skb destructor is not called in
      a context where kernel_sendmsg() can be invoked.
      
      To this end, the following changes are made:
      
       (1) kernel_rxrpc_data_consumed() is added.  This should be called whenever
           an skb is emptied so as to crank the ACK and call states.  This does
           not release the skb, however.  kernel_rxrpc_free_skb() must now be
           called to achieve that.  These together replace
           rxrpc_kernel_data_delivered().
      
       (2) kernel_rxrpc_data_consumed() is wrapped by afs_data_consumed().
      
           This makes afs_deliver_to_call() easier to work as the skb can simply
           be discarded unconditionally here without trying to work out what the
           return value of the ->deliver() function means.
      
           The ->deliver() functions can, via afs_data_complete(),
           afs_transfer_reply() and afs_extract_data() mark that an skb has been
           consumed (thereby cranking the state) without the need to
           conditionally free the skb to make sure the state is correct on an
           incoming call for when the call processor tries to send the reply.
      
       (3) rxrpc_recvmsg() now has to call kernel_rxrpc_data_consumed() when it
           has finished with a packet and MSG_PEEK isn't set.
      
       (4) rxrpc_packet_destructor() no longer calls rxrpc_hard_ACK_data().
      
           Because of this, we no longer need to clear the destructor and put the
           call before we free the skb in cases where we don't want the ACK/call
           state to be cranked.
      
       (5) The ->deliver() call-type callbacks are made to return -EAGAIN rather
           than 0 if they expect more data (afs_extract_data() returns -EAGAIN to
           the delivery function already), and the caller is now responsible for
           producing an abort if that was the last packet.
      
       (6) There are many bits of unmarshalling code where:
      
       		ret = afs_extract_data(call, skb, last, ...);
      		switch (ret) {
      		case 0:		break;
      		case -EAGAIN:	return 0;
      		default:	return ret;
      		}
      
           is to be found.  As -EAGAIN can now be passed back to the caller, we
           now just return if ret < 0:
      
       		ret = afs_extract_data(call, skb, last, ...);
      		if (ret < 0)
      			return ret;
      
       (7) Checks for trailing data and empty final data packets has been
           consolidated as afs_data_complete().  So:
      
      		if (skb->len > 0)
      			return -EBADMSG;
      		if (!last)
      			return 0;
      
           becomes:
      
      		ret = afs_data_complete(call, skb, last);
      		if (ret < 0)
      			return ret;
      
       (8) afs_transfer_reply() now checks the amount of data it has against the
           amount of data desired and the amount of data in the skb and returns
           an error to induce an abort if we don't get exactly what we want.
      
      Without these changes, the following oops can occasionally be observed,
      particularly if some printks are inserted into the delivery path:
      
      general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
      Modules linked in: kafs(E) af_rxrpc(E) [last unloaded: af_rxrpc]
      CPU: 0 PID: 1305 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G            E   4.7.0-fsdevel+ #1303
      Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014
      Workqueue: kafsd afs_async_workfn [kafs]
      task: ffff88040be041c0 ti: ffff88040c070000 task.ti: ffff88040c070000
      RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8108fd3c>]  [<ffffffff8108fd3c>] __lock_acquire+0xcf/0x15a1
      RSP: 0018:ffff88040c073bc0  EFLAGS: 00010002
      RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88040d29a710
      RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88040d29a710
      RBP: ffff88040c073c70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
      R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
      R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88040be041c0 R15: ffffffff814c928f
      FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88041fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      CR2: 00007fa4595f4750 CR3: 0000000001c14000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
      Stack:
       0000000000000006 000000000be04930 0000000000000000 ffff880400000000
       ffff880400000000 ffffffff8108f847 ffff88040be041c0 ffffffff81050446
       ffff8803fc08a920 ffff8803fc08a958 ffff88040be041c0 ffff88040c073c38
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8108f847>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5e/0x74
       [<ffffffff81050446>] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9b/0xa1
       [<ffffffff8108f9ca>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16d/0x189
       [<ffffffff810915f4>] lock_acquire+0x122/0x1b6
       [<ffffffff810915f4>] ? lock_acquire+0x122/0x1b6
       [<ffffffff814c928f>] ? skb_dequeue+0x18/0x61
       [<ffffffff81609dbf>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x35/0x49
       [<ffffffff814c928f>] ? skb_dequeue+0x18/0x61
       [<ffffffff814c928f>] skb_dequeue+0x18/0x61
       [<ffffffffa009aa92>] afs_deliver_to_call+0x344/0x39d [kafs]
       [<ffffffffa009ab37>] afs_process_async_call+0x4c/0xd5 [kafs]
       [<ffffffffa0099e9c>] afs_async_workfn+0xe/0x10 [kafs]
       [<ffffffff81063a3a>] process_one_work+0x29d/0x57c
       [<ffffffff81064ac2>] worker_thread+0x24a/0x385
       [<ffffffff81064878>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2d0/0x2d0
       [<ffffffff810696f5>] kthread+0xf3/0xfb
       [<ffffffff8160a6ff>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
       [<ffffffff81069602>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1cf/0x1cf
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      372ee163
  21. 22 6月, 2016 1 次提交