TXWI writing is exactly the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb, so
make it common code.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Update channel initialization for the RF3052 chipset.
According to the Ralink drivers, the rt3x array must be
used for this chipset, rather then the rt2x array.

Furthermore RF3052 supports the 5GHz band, extend
the rt3x array with the 5GHz channels, and use them
for the RF3052 chip.
Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The SIFS value is a constant and doesn't need to be updated on erp changes.
Furthermore the code used 10us for both, the OFDM SIFS and CCK SIFS time
which broke CTS protected 11g connections (see patch "rt2x00: rt2800: update
initial SIFS values" for details).
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Currently the CCK and OFDM SIFS value is set to 32us. This value is neither
used by the Ralink driver nor specified in 802.11.

Instead of using 10us for CCK SIFS (as defined in 802.11) use 16us like in the
Ralink drivers. And indeed using a SIFS value of 10us breaks connectivity with
11g + CTS protected connections. Add a comment to the code why we don't use 10us
for CCK SIFS value.

The OFDM SIFS value is set to 16us (as defined in 802.11 and also used by the
Ralink drivers).
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Inspection of the Ralink vendor driver shows that the TX_BAND_CFG register
and BBP register 3 are about HT40- indication, not about HT40+ indication.
Inverse the meaning of these fields in the code.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

PCI specific code has been remove quite some time ago.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Update the rfcsr and bbp init code for SoC devices to match with the
latest Ralink driver.

To have better control over which values are used for the register
initialization create a new function rt2800_is_305x_soc which checks
for SoC interface type, the correct RT chipset and the correct RF
chipset. This is based on the assumption that all rt305x SoC devices
use a rt2872 and rf3020/rf3021/rf3022.

In case an unknown RF chipset is found on a SoC device with a rt2872
don't treat it as rt305x and just print a message.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Remove redundant check for RT2872.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Restore the rfcsr initialization for RT305x SoC devices which was removed
by "rt2x00: Finish rt3070 support in rt2800 register initialization.".

This fixes the rx path on SoC devices.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Get closer to what the ralink driver does by setting the rf register 13
to tx_power2 during channel switch.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Disable HT40 support for now as it causes rx problems with HT40 capable
11n APs (when mac80211 enables HT40, rx is completely disfunctional).

Once the rt2800 HT code is capable of using HT40 we should enable the
flag again.

I only tested this patch with a rt305x SoC device, nevertheless the
patch disables HT40 also on PCI and USB rt2800 devices.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3390 vendor driver.

Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3090 vendor driver.

Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3070 vendor driver.

With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was
incomplete.
Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink
vendor driver.

With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the
Ralink vendor driver.
This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 /
RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't
mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more
meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these
chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more
revision numbers rather than version numbers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the
Ralink vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink
vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based
on the RF chipset that is used.
Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account,
thereby greatly simplifying the check.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2872 needs the same rf register setup as rt3070 and rt3090, hence
use rt2800_config_channel_rt3x instead of rt2800_config_channel_rt2x.
This change allows me to actually switch channels and hence scan all
configured channels on the RT305x SoC platform (which uses a rt2872)
here.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NLuis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In all drivers ensure that auto wakeup is disabled before waking up the device.
This is needed to prevent connection stability issues and problems in waking up
the device.

Based upon a patch from Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The recent rt2800 devices are no longer really identified by their PCI
ID's, but rather by the contents of their CSR0 register. Also for the
other chipsets is the contents of this CSR0 register important.
Change the chipset determination logic to be more aligned with the rt2800
model.
Preparation for the support of rt3070 / rt3090 based devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Don't set the RT chipset for a device from within the generic PCI/SOC code,
but rather from the individual drivers, so that individual drivers have
more control over what RT chipset is set.
Preparation for chip handling updates for rt2800 devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Introduce the SoC interface type to detect SoC devices, instead of having
them mimic being PCI devices.
This allows for easier detection of SoC devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

get_tx_stats() will be removed from mac80211.

Compile-tested only.
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It is only used within the rt2800lib module itself.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The rt2800pci_wait_wpdma_ready and rt2800usb_wait_wpdma_ready functions are
exactly the same, so unify them into rt200lib.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The RF3052 chipset is now also being integrated onto USB devices, so
allow the RF chipset and don't treat it as PCI/SOC only.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2800_blink_set uses an illegal value to set the LED_CFG_G_LED_MODE
field of the LED_CFG register. This field is only 2 bits large, so
should be initialized with value that fits. Use default value from
the vendor driver.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Let each of them take a struct rt2x00_dev pointer as argument instead of
a mixture of struct rt2x00_chip and struct rt2x00_dev pointers.
Preparation for further clean ups in the rt2x00 chip handling, especially
for rt2800 devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2800lib currently checks whether RT2800USB is enabled in the configuration.
Strictly speaking this is not necessary, it only needs to know whether the
generic rt2x00usb library functions are available. Therefore check for
RT2X00_LIB_USB instead.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

I noticed yesterday, because Jeff had noticed
a speed regression, cf. bug
http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2138
that the SM PS settings for peers were wrong.
Instead of overwriting the SM PS settings with
the local bits, we need to keep the remote bits.

The bug was part of the original HT code from
over two years ago, but unfortunately nobody
noticed that it makes no sense -- we shouldn't
be overwriting the peer's setting with our own
but rather keep it intact when masking the peer
capabilities with our own.

While fixing that, I noticed that the masking of
capabilities is completely useless for most of
the bits, so also fix those other bits.

Finally, I also noticed that PSMP_SUPPORT no
longer exists in the final 802.11n version, so
also remove that.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

We've had many reports of rt61pci failures with powersaving enabled.
Therefore, as a stop-gap measure, disable powersaving of the rt61pci
until we have found a proper solution.
Also disable powersaving on rt2800pci as it most probably will show
the same problem.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

sizeof(iv16) and sizeof(iv32) are the sizes of pointers.  Change them to
the size of the copied data.

Furthermore, iveiv_entry is a local structure that has just been
initialized and is not visible outside this function.  Thus, there would
seem to be no point to copy data into it.  The order of the arguments is
thus changed to copy the data into the parameters, which are provided as
pointers, suggesting in this case that they should be used to return values.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds the first problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression *x;
expression f;
type T;
@@

*f(...,(T)x,...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2800lib incorrectly detected whether RT2800USB was enabled because
it didn't account for a modularized RT2800USB driver.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Set the value of extra_tx_headroom in a central place, rather than in each
of the drivers. This is preparatory for taking alignment space into account
in the TX headroom requested by rt2x00.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

RT chipsets are unique across both PCI and USB busses, and don't overlap.
Therefore there is no need to test for bus type when only checking for
chipset type. Remove the redundant checks.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Some RT28xx/RT30xx devices don't support 802.11n, when they are combined with
the RF2020 chipset. Ensure that HT is disabled for these devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>