- 27 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
The Montgomery Multiply, Montgomery Square, and Multiple-Precision Multiply instructions work by loading a combination of the floating point and multiple register windows worth of integer registers with the inputs. These values are 64-bit. But for 32-bit userland processes we only save the low 32-bits of each integer register during a register spill. This is because the register window save area is in the user stack and has a fixed layout. Therefore, the only way to use these instruction in 32-bit mode is to perform the following sequence: 1) Load the top-32bits of a choosen integer register with a sentinel, say "-1". This will be in the outer-most register window. The idea is that we're trying to see if the outer-most register window gets spilled, and thus the 64-bit values were truncated. 2) Load all the inputs for the montmul/montsqr/mpmul instruction, down to the inner-most register window. 3) Execute the opcode. 4) Traverse back up to the outer-most register window. 5) Check the sentinel, if it's still "-1" store the results. Otherwise retry the entire sequence. This retry is extremely troublesome. If you're just unlucky and an interrupt or other trap happens, it'll push that outer-most window to the stack and clear the sentinel when we restore it. We could retry forever and never make forward progress if interrupts arrive at a fast enough rate (consider perf events as one example). So we have do limited retries and fallback to software which is extremely non-deterministic. Luckily it's very straightforward to provide a mechanism to let 32-bit applications use a 64-bit stack. Stacks in 64-bit mode are biased by 2047 bytes, which means that the lowest bit is set in the actual %sp register value. So if we see bit zero set in a 32-bit application's stack we treat it like a 64-bit stack. Runtime detection of such a facility is tricky, and cumbersome at best. For example, just trying to use a biased stack and seeing if it works is hard to recover from (the signal handler will need to use an alt stack, plus something along the lines of longjmp). Therefore, we add a system call to report a bitmask of arch specific features like this in a cheap and less hairy way. With help from Andy Polyakov. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Disintegrate asm/system.h for Sparc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
-
- 31 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the resulting interrupt do the wakeup. For the various event classes: - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from the PMI-tail (ARM etc.) - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context. - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot perform wakeups, and hence need 0. As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented). The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a bunch of conditionals in fast paths. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 08 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Semicolons are not necessary after switch/while/for/if braces so remove them. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This mirrors commit 196f02bf (powerpc: perf_event: Add alignment-faults and emulation-faults software events) Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roel Kluin 提交于
`>>' has a higher precedence than `?' so src2 evaluated to either 16 or 0 dependent on the bits set in rs2. Signed-off-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
o Move all files from sparc64/kernel/ to sparc/kernel - rename as appropriate o Update sparc/Makefile to the changes o Update sparc/kernel/Makefile to include the sparc64 files NOTE: This commit changes link order on sparc64! Link order had to change for either of sparc32 and sparc64. And assuming sparc64 see more testing than sparc32 change link order on sparc64 where issues will be caught faster. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Hong H. Pham 提交于
Copy the FPU state to the task's thread_info->fpregs for the VIS emulation functions to access. Signed-off-by: NHong H. Pham <hong.pham@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Myers 提交于
This patch fixes some bugs in VIS emulation that cause the GCC test failure FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/pdist-3.c execution test for both 32-bit and 64-bit testing on hardware lacking these instructions. The emulation code for the pdist instruction uses RS1(insn) for both source registers rs1 and rs2, which is obviously wrong and leads to the instruction doing nothing (the observed problem), and further inspection of the code shows that RS1 uses a shift of 24 and RD a shift of 25, which clearly cannot both be right; examining SPARC documentation indicates the correct shift for RS1 is 14. This patch fixes the bug if single-stepping over the affected instruction in the debugger, but not if the testcase is run standalone. For that, Wind River has another patch I hope they will send as a followup to this patch submission. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
1) edge8 tables should be static 2) add vis_emul() extern decl. to asm/visasm.h Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
To add this logic, put the VIS instruction check at the vis_emul() call site instead of inside of vis_emul(). Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Niagara does not implement some of the VIS instructions in hardware, so we have to emulate them. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-