- 11 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
When compiling with icc, <linux/compiler-gcc.h> ends up included because the icc environment defines __GNUC__. Thus, we neither need nor want to have this macro defined in both compiler-gcc.h and compiler-intel.h, and the fact that they are inconsistent just makes the compiler spew warnings. Reported-by: NSunil K. Pandey <sunil.k.pandey@intel.com> Cc: Kevin B. Smith <kevin.b.smith@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-0mbwou1zt7pafij09b897lg3@git.kernel.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Since GCC 4.4, there have been __builtin_bswap32() and __builtin_bswap16() intrinsics. A __builtin_bswap16() came a little later (4.6 for PowerPC, 48 for other platforms). By using these instead of the inline assembler that most architectures have in their __arch_swabXX() macros, we let the compiler see what's actually happening. The resulting code should be at least as good, and much *better* in the cases where it can be combined with a nearby load or store, using a load-and-byteswap or store-and-byteswap instruction (e.g. lwbrx/stwbrx on PowerPC, movbe on Atom). When GCC is sufficiently recent *and* the architecture opts in to using the intrinsics by setting CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP, they will be used in preference to the __arch_swabXX() macros. An architecture which does not set ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP will continue to use its own hand-crafted macros. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Replace worthless comments with actual preprocessor errors when including the wrong versions of the compiler.h files. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: make it work] Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 5月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
We can use a gcc extension to ensure that ARRAY_SIZE() is handed an array, not a pointer. This is especially important when code is changed from a fixed array to a pointer. I assume the Intel compiler doesn't support __builtin_types_compatible_p. [jdike@addtoit.com: uml: update UML definition of ARRAY_SIZE] Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
Introduce a macro for suppressing gcc from generating a warning about a probable uninitialized state of a variable. Example: - spinlock_t *ptl; + spinlock_t *uninitialized_var(ptl); Not a happy solution, but those warnings are obnoxious. - Using the usual pointlessly-set-it-to-zero approach wastes several bytes of text. - Using a macro means we can (hopefully) do something else if gcc changes cause the `x = x' hack to stop working - Using a macro means that people who are worried about hiding true bugs can easily turn it off. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-