1. 15 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() · 4918e1f8
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that
      if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child
      drivers generally have to do that too because of the parent usage
      counter manipulations necessary to get the correct state of the parent
      during system-wide transitions to the working state (system resume).
      However, that limitation turns out to be artificial, so remove it.
      
      Namely, pm_runtime_force_suspend() only needs to update the children
      counter of its parent (if there's is a parent) when the device can
      stay in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition, as
      that counter is correct already otherwise.  Now, if the parent's
      children counter is not updated, it is not necessary to increment
      the parent's usage counter in that case any more, as long as the
      children counters of devices are checked along with their usage
      counters in order to decide whether or not the devices may be left
      in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition.
      
      Accordingly, modify pm_runtime_force_suspend() to only call
      pm_runtime_set_suspended() for devices whose usage and children
      counters are at the "no references" level (the runtime PM status
      of the device needs to be updated to "suspended" anyway in case
      this function is called once again for the same device during the
      transition under way), drop the parent usage counter incrementation
      from it and update pm_runtime_force_resume() to compensate for these
      changes.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      4918e1f8
  2. 04 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 17 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / runtime: Drop children check from __pm_runtime_set_status() · f8817f61
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The check for "active" children in __pm_runtime_set_status(), when
      trying to set the parent device status to "suspended", doesn't
      really make sense, because in fact it is not invalid to set the
      status of a device with runtime PM disabled to "suspended" in any
      case.  It is invalid to enable runtime PM for a device with its
      status set to "suspended" while its child_count reference counter
      is nonzero, but the check in __pm_runtime_set_status() doesn't
      really cover that situation.
      
      For this reason, drop the children check from __pm_runtime_set_status()
      and add a check against child_count reference counters of "suspended"
      devices to pm_runtime_enable().
      
      Fixes: a8636c89 (PM / Runtime: Don't allow to suspend a device with an active child)
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: NJohan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
      f8817f61
  4. 08 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 01 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  6. 25 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns... · 6aa7de05
      Mark Rutland 提交于
      locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()
      
      Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the
      coccinelle script shown below and apply its output.
      
      For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
      preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
      former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
      ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in
      churn.
      
      However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to
      correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write
      accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining
      ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following
      coccinelle script:
      
      ----
      // Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and
      // WRITE_ONCE()
      
      // $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch
      
      virtual patch
      
      @ depends on patch @
      expression E1, E2;
      @@
      
      - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
      + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)
      
      @ depends on patch @
      expression E;
      @@
      
      - ACCESS_ONCE(E)
      + READ_ONCE(E)
      ----
      Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: davem@davemloft.net
      Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
      Cc: shuah@kernel.org
      Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
      Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
      Cc: tj@kernel.org
      Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
      Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6aa7de05
  7. 24 10月, 2017 2 次提交
    • R
      PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS · 0cc2b4e5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The special value of 0 for device resume latency PM QoS means
      "no restriction", but there are two problems with that.
      
      First, device resume latency PM QoS requests with 0 as the
      value are always put in front of requests with positive
      values in the priority lists used internally by the PM QoS
      framework, causing 0 to be chosen as an effective constraint
      value.  However, that 0 is then interpreted as "no restriction"
      effectively overriding the other requests with specific
      restrictions which is incorrect.
      
      Second, the users of device resume latency PM QoS have no
      way to specify that *any* resume latency at all should be
      avoided, which is an artificial limitation in general.
      
      To address these issues, modify device resume latency PM QoS to
      use S32_MAX as the "no constraint" value and 0 as the "no
      latency at all" one and rework its users (the cpuidle menu
      governor, the genpd QoS governor and the runtime PM framework)
      to follow these changes.
      
      Also add a special "n/a" value to the corresponding user space I/F
      to allow user space to indicate that it cannot accept any resume
      latencies at all for the given device.
      
      Fixes: 85dc0b8a (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints)
      Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197323Reported-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
      Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      0cc2b4e5
    • K
      PM / core: Convert timers to use timer_setup() · 96428e98
      Kees Cook 提交于
      In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
      all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
      to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Removes test of .data field, since
      that will be going away.
      Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      96428e98
  8. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 04 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / runtime: Avoid false-positive warnings from might_sleep_if() · a9306a63
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The might_sleep_if() assertions in __pm_runtime_idle(),
      __pm_runtime_suspend() and __pm_runtime_resume() may generate
      false-positive warnings in some situations.  For example, that
      happens if a nested pm_runtime_get_sync()/pm_runtime_put() pair
      is executed with disabled interrupts within an outer
      pm_runtime_get_sync()/pm_runtime_put() section for the same device.
      [Generally, pm_runtime_get_sync() may sleep, so it should not be
      called with disabled interrupts, but in this particular case the
      previous pm_runtime_get_sync() guarantees that the device will not
      be suspended, so the inner pm_runtime_get_sync() will return
      immediately after incrementing the device's usage counter.]
      
      That started to happen in the i915 driver in 4.10-rc, leading to
      the following splat:
      
       BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1032
       in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1500, name: Xorg
       1 lock held by Xorg/1500:
        #0:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
        [<ffffffffa0680c13>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x43/0x140 [i915]
       CPU: 0 PID: 1500 Comm: Xorg Not tainted
       Call Trace:
        dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
        ___might_sleep+0x196/0x260
        __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0
        __pm_runtime_resume+0x7a/0x90
        intel_runtime_pm_get+0x25/0x90 [i915]
        aliasing_gtt_bind_vma+0xaa/0xf0 [i915]
        i915_vma_bind+0xaf/0x1e0 [i915]
        i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_entry+0x513/0x6f0 [i915]
        i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_vma.isra.34+0x188/0x250 [i915]
        ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
        ? i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma.isra.31+0x152/0x1f0 [i915]
        ? i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve.isra.32+0x372/0x3a0 [i915]
        i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.38+0xa70/0x1a40 [i915]
        ? __might_fault+0x4e/0xb0
        i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xc5/0x260 [i915]
        ? __might_fault+0x4e/0xb0
        drm_ioctl+0x206/0x450 [drm]
        ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x340/0x340 [i915]
        ? __fget+0x5/0x200
        do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x6f0
        ? __fget+0x111/0x200
        ? __fget+0x5/0x200
        SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
        entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
      
      even though the code triggering it is correct.
      
      Unfortunately, the might_sleep_if() assertions in question are
      too coarse-grained to cover such cases correctly, so make them
      a bit less sensitive in order to avoid the false-positives.
      Reported-and-tested-by: NSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      a9306a63
  10. 07 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspend · bed57030
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      I noticed some wakeirq flakeyness with consumer drivers not using
      autosuspend. For drivers not using autosuspend, the wakeirq may never
      get unmasked in rpm_suspend() because of irq desc->depth.
      
      We are configuring dedicated wakeirqs to start with IRQ_NOAUTOEN as we
      naturally don't want them running until rpm_suspend() is called.
      
      However, when a consumer driver initially calls pm_runtime_get(), we
      now wrongly start with disable_irq_nosync() call on the dedicated
      wakeirq that is disabled to start with.
      
      This causes desc->depth to toggle between 1 and 2 instead of the usual
      0 and 1. This can prevent enable_irq() from unmasking the wakeirq as
      that only happens at desc->depth 1.
      
      This does not necessarily show up with drivers using autosuspend as
      there is time for disable_irq_nosync() before rpm_suspend() gets called
      after the autosuspend timeout.
      
      Let's fix the issue by adding wirq->status that lazily gets set on
      the first rpm_suspend(). We also need PM runtime core private functions
      for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check()
      so we can enable the dedicated wakeirq on the first rpm_suspend().
      
      While at it, let's also fix the comments for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq()
      and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). Those can still be used by the consumer
      drivers as needed because the IRQ core manages the interrupt usecount
      for us.
      
      Fixes: 4990d4fe (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling)
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bed57030
  11. 19 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 09 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 01 11月, 2016 2 次提交
    • R
      PM / runtime: Optimize the use of device links · baa8809f
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      If the device has no links to suppliers that should be used for
      runtime PM (links with DEVICE_LINK_PM_RUNTIME set), there is no
      reason to walk the list of suppliers for that device during
      runtime suspend and resume.
      
      Add a simple mechanism to detect that case and possibly avoid the
      extra unnecessary overhead.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      baa8809f
    • R
      PM / runtime: Use device links · 21d5c57b
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify the runtime PM framework to use device links to ensure that
      supplier devices will not be suspended if any of their consumer
      devices are active.
      
      The idea is to reference count suppliers on the consumer's resume
      and drop references to them on its suspend.  The information on
      whether or not the supplier has been reference counted by the
      consumer's (runtime) resume is stored in a new field (rpm_active)
      in the link object for each link.
      
      It may be necessary to clean up those references when the
      supplier is unbinding and that's why the links whose status is
      DEVICE_LINK_SUPPLIER_UNBIND are skipped by the runtime suspend
      and resume code.
      
      The above means that if the consumer device is probed in the
      runtime-active state, the supplier has to be resumed and reference
      counted by device_link_add() so the code works as expected on its
      (runtime) suspend.  There is a new flag, DEVICE_LINK_RPM_ACTIVE,
      to tell device_link_add() about that (in which case the caller
      is responsible for making sure that the consumer really will
      be runtime-active when runtime PM is enabled for it).
      
      The other new link flag, DEVICE_LINK_PM_RUNTIME, tells the core
      whether or not the link should be used for runtime PM at all.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      21d5c57b
  14. 21 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  15. 16 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • P
      PM / runtime: Use _rcuidle for runtime suspend tracepoints · 77893577
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      Further testing with false negatives suppressed by commit 293e2421
      ("rcu: Remove superfluous versions of rcu_read_lock_sched_held()")
      identified a few more unprotected uses of RCU from the idle loop.
      Because RCU actively ignores idle-loop code (for energy-efficiency
      reasons, among other things), using RCU from the idle loop can result
      in too-short grace periods, in turn resulting in arbitrary misbehavior.
      
      The affected function is rpm_suspend().
      
      The resulting lockdep-RCU splat is as follows:
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Warning from omap3
      
      ===============================
      [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
      4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1112 Not tainted
      -------------------------------
      include/trace/events/rpm.h:63 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
      rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
      RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
      1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
       #0:  (&(&dev->power.lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c052ee24>] __pm_runtime_suspend+0x54/0x84
      
      stack backtrace:
      CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1112
      Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
      [<c0110308>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
      [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack) from [<c047fec8>] (dump_stack+0xb0/0xe4)
      [<c047fec8>] (dump_stack) from [<c052d7b4>] (rpm_suspend+0x604/0x7e4)
      [<c052d7b4>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c052ee34>] (__pm_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x84)
      [<c052ee34>] (__pm_runtime_suspend) from [<c04bf3bc>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle+0x5c/0x70)
      [<c04bf3bc>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle) from [<c01255e8>] (omap_sram_idle+0x140/0x244)
      [<c01255e8>] (omap_sram_idle) from [<c0126b48>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm+0xfc/0x1ec)
      [<c0126b48>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm) from [<c0601db8>] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x80/0x3d4)
      [<c0601db8>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0183c74>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x198/0x3a0)
      [<c0183c74>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel+0x354/0x3c8)
      [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel) from [<8000807c>] (0x8000807c)
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Reported-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
      [ rjw: Subject ]
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      77893577
  16. 31 8月, 2016 2 次提交
    • P
      PM / runtime: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_idle() use from idle · d7737ce9
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      This commit appends a few _rcuidle suffixes to fix the following
      RCU-used-from-idle bug:
      
      > ===============================
      > [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
      > 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1116 Not tainted
      > -------------------------------
      > include/trace/events/rpm.h:95 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
      >
      > other info that might help us debug this:
      >
      >
      > RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
      > rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
      > RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
      > 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
      >  #0:  (&(&dev->power.lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c052cc2c>] __rpm_callback+0x58/0x60
      >
      > stack backtrace:
      > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1116
      > Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
      > [<c0110290>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
      > [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack) from [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack+0xb0/0xe4)
      > [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack) from [<c052d5d0>] (rpm_suspend+0x580/0x768)
      > [<c052d5d0>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c052ec58>] (__pm_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x84)
      > [<c052ec58>] (__pm_runtime_suspend) from [<c04bf25c>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle+0x5c/0x70)
      > [<c04bf25c>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle) from [<c0125568>] (omap_sram_idle+0x140/0x244)
      > [<c0125568>] (omap_sram_idle) from [<c01269dc>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm+0xfc/0x1ec)
      > [<c01269dc>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm) from [<c0601bdc>] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x80/0x3d4)
      > [<c0601bdc>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0183b08>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x198/0x3a0)
      > [<c0183b08>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel+0x354/0x3c8)
      > [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel) from [<8000807c>] (0x8000807c)
      
      In the immortal words of Steven Rostedt, "*Whack* *Whack* *Whack*!!!"
      Reported-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
      WhACKED-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d7737ce9
    • P
      PM / runtime: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_resume() to be called from idle · d44c950e
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      This commit applies another _rcuidle suffix to fix an RCU use from
      idle.
      
      > ===============================
      > [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
      > 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1122 Not tainted
      > -------------------------------
      > include/trace/events/rpm.h:69 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
      >
      > other info that might help us debug this:
      >
      >
      > RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
      > rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
      > RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
      > 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
      >  #0:  (&(&dev->power.lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<c052e3dc>] __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x64
      >
      > stack backtrace:
      > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1122
      > Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
      > [<c0110290>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
      > [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack) from [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack+0xb0/0xe4)
      > [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack) from [<c052e178>] (rpm_resume+0x5cc/0x7f4)
      > [<c052e178>] (rpm_resume) from [<c052e3ec>] (__pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x64)
      > [<c052e3ec>] (__pm_runtime_resume) from [<c04bf2c4>] (omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle+0x54/0x68)
      > [<c04bf2c4>] (omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle) from [<c01269dc>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm+0xfc/0x1ec)
      > [<c01269dc>] (omap3_enter_idle_bm) from [<c060198c>] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x80/0x3d4)
      > [<c060198c>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c0183b08>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x198/0x3a0)
      > [<c0183b08>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel+0x354/0x3c8)
      > [<c0b00c0c>] (start_kernel) from [<8000807c>] (0x8000807c)
      Reported-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d44c950e
  17. 02 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  18. 28 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 16 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 22 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 21 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  22. 30 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • U
      PM / runtime: Re-init runtime PM states at probe error and driver unbind · 5de85b9d
      Ulf Hansson 提交于
      There are two common expectations among several subsystems/drivers that
      deploys runtime PM support, but which isn't met by the driver core.
      
      Expectation 1)
      At ->probe() the subsystem/driver expects the runtime PM status of the
      device to be RPM_SUSPENDED, which is the initial status being assigned at
      device registration.
      
      This expectation is especially common among some of those subsystems/
      drivers that manages devices with an attached PM domain, as those requires
      the ->runtime_resume() callback at the PM domain level to be invoked
      during ->probe().
      
      Moreover these subsystems/drivers entirely relies on runtime PM resources
      being managed at the PM domain level, thus don't implement their own set
      of runtime PM callbacks.
      
      These are two scenarios that suffers from this unmet expectation.
      
      i) A failed ->probe() sequence requests probe deferral:
      
      ->probe()
        ...
        pm_runtime_enable()
        pm_runtime_get_sync()
        ...
      
      err:
        pm_runtime_put()
        pm_runtime_disable()
        ...
      
      As there are no guarantees that such sequence turns the runtime PM status
      of the device into RPM_SUSPENDED, the re-trying ->probe() may start with
      the status in RPM_ACTIVE.
      
      In such case the runtime PM core won't invoke the ->runtime_resume()
      callback because of a pm_runtime_get_sync(), as it considers the device to
      be already runtime resumed.
      
      ii) A driver re-bind sequence:
      
      At driver unbind, the subsystem/driver's >remove() callback invokes a
      sequence of runtime PM APIs, to undo actions during ->probe() and to put
      the device into low power state.
      
      ->remove()
        ...
        pm_runtime_put()
        pm_runtime_disable()
        ...
      
      Similar as in the failing ->probe() case, this sequence don't guarantee
      the runtime PM status of the device to turn into RPM_SUSPENDED.
      
      Trying to re-bind the driver thus causes the same issue as when re-trying
      ->probe(), in the probe deferral scenario.
      
      Expectation 2)
      Drivers that invokes the pm_runtime_irq_safe() API during ->probe(),
      triggers the runtime PM core to increase the usage count for the device's
      parent and permanently make it runtime resumed.
      
      The usage count is only dropped at device removal, which also allows it to
      be runtime suspended again.
      
      A re-trying ->probe() repeats the call to pm_runtime_irq_safe() and thus
      once more triggers the usage count of the device's parent to be increased.
      
      This leads to not only an imbalance issue of the usage count of the
      device's parent, but also to keep it runtime resumed permanently even if
      ->probe() fails.
      
      To address these issues, let's change the policy of the driver core to
      meet these expectations. More precisely, at ->probe() failures and driver
      unbind, restore the initial states of runtime PM.
      
      Although to still allow subsystem's to control PM for devices that doesn't
      ->probe() successfully, don't restore the initial states unless runtime PM
      is disabled.
      Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      5de85b9d
  23. 20 5月, 2015 2 次提交
    • T
      PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling · 4990d4fe
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
      quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
      by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.
      
      And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
      in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
      adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
      device PM runtime to wake up the device.
      
      This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
      are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.
      
      For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
      boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
      functions:
      
      	...
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
      	...
      	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
      		enable_irq_wake(irq);
      	...
      	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
      		disable_irq_wake(irq);
      	...
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
      	...
      
      We can replace it with just the following init and exit
      time code:
      
      	...
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
      	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
      	...
      	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
      	...
      
      And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:
      
      	...
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
      	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
      	...
      	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
      	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
      	...
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4990d4fe
    • T
      PM / Runtime: Update last_busy in rpm_resume · 56f487c7
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      If we don't update last_busy in rpm_resume, devices can go back
      to sleep immediately after resume. This happens at least in
      cases where the device has been powered off and does not have
      any interrupt pending until there's something in the FIFO.
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      56f487c7
  24. 04 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 06 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  26. 12 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 02 3月, 2014 2 次提交
    • U
      PM: Add pm_runtime_suspend|resume_force functions · 37f20416
      Ulf Hansson 提交于
      This patch provides two new runtime PM helper functions which intend to
      be used from system suspend/resume callbacks, to make sure devices are
      put into low power state during system suspend and brought back to full
      power at system resume.
      
      The prerequisite is to have all levels of a device's runtime PM
      callbacks to be defined through the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS macro, which
      means these are available for CONFIG_PM.
      
      By using the new runtime PM helper functions especially the two
      scenarios below will be addressed.
      
      1) The PM core prevents .runtime_suspend callbacks from being invoked
      during system suspend. That means even for a runtime PM centric
      subsystem and driver, the device needs to be put into low power state
      from a system suspend callback. Otherwise it may very well be left in
      full power state (runtime resumed) while the system is suspended. By
      using the new helper functions, we make sure to walk the hierarchy of
      a device's power domain, subsystem and driver.
      
      2) Subsystems and drivers need to cope with all the combinations of
      CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME. The two new helper functions
      smothly addresses this.
      Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      37f20416
    • U
      PM / runtime: Fetch runtime PM callbacks using a macro · 5f59df79
      Ulf Hansson 提交于
      While fetching the proper runtime PM callback, we walk the hierarchy of
      device's power domains, subsystems and drivers.
      
      This is common for rpm_suspend(), rpm_idle() and rpm_resume(). Let's
      clean up the code by using a macro that handles this.
      Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      5f59df79
  28. 16 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 04 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  30. 12 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 24 2月, 2013 2 次提交
    • M
      pm / runtime: force memory allocation with no I/O during Runtime PM callbcack · db88175f
      Ming Lei 提交于
      Apply the introduced memalloc_noio_save() and memalloc_noio_restore() to
      force memory allocation with no I/O during runtime_resume/runtime_suspend
      callback on device with the flag of 'memalloc_noio' set.
      Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: David Decotigny <david.decotigny@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@suse.com>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      db88175f
    • M
      pm / runtime: introduce pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio() · e823407f
      Ming Lei 提交于
      Introduce the flag memalloc_noio in 'struct dev_pm_info' to help PM core
      to teach mm not allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL flag for avoiding
      probable deadlock.
      
      As explained in the comment, any GFP_KERNEL allocation inside
      runtime_resume() or runtime_suspend() on any one of device in the path
      from one block or network device to the root device in the device tree
      may cause deadlock, the introduced pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio() sets
      or clears the flag on device in the path recursively.
      Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@suse.com>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: David Decotigny <david.decotigny@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e823407f
  32. 23 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • K
      PM / Runtime: let rpm_resume() succeed if RPM_ACTIVE, even when disabled, v2 · 6f3c77b0
      Kevin Hilman 提交于
      There are several drivers where the return value of
      pm_runtime_get_sync() is used to decide whether or not it is safe to
      access hardware and that don't provide .suspend() callbacks for system
      suspend (but may use late/noirq callbacks.)  If such a driver happens
      to call pm_runtime_get_sync() during system suspend, after the core
      has disabled runtime PM, it will get the error code and will decide
      that the hardware should not be accessed, although this may be a wrong
      conclusion, depending on the state of the device when runtime PM was
      disabled.
      
      Drivers might work around this problem by using a test like:
      
         ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
         if (!ret || (ret == -EACCES && driver_private_data(dev)->suspended)) {
            /* access hardware */
         }
      
      where driver_private_data(dev)->suspended is a flag set by the
      driver's .suspend() method (that would have to be added for this
      purpose).  However, that potentially would need to be done by multiple
      drivers which means quite a lot of duplicated code and bloat.
      
      To avoid that we can use the observation that the core sets
      dev->power.is_suspended before disabling runtime PM and use that
      instead of the driver's private flag.  Still, potentially many drivers
      would need to repeat that same check in quite a few places, so it's
      better to let the core do it.
      
      Then we can be a bit smarter and check whether or not runtime PM was
      disabled by the core only (disable_depth == 1) or by someone else in
      addition to the core (disable_depth > 1).  In the former case
      rpm_resume() can return 1 if the runtime PM status is RPM_ACTIVE,
      because it means the device was active when the core disabled runtime
      PM.  In the latter case it should still return -EACCES, because it
      isn't clear why runtime PM has been disabled.
      
      Tested on AM3730/Beagle-xM where a wakeup IRQ firing during the late
      suspend phase triggers runtime PM activity in the I2C driver since the
      wakeup IRQ is on an I2C-connected PMIC.
      
      [rjw: Modified whitespace to follow the file's convention.]
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      6f3c77b0
  33. 04 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      PM: Do not use the syscore flag for runtime PM · feb70af0
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The syscore device PM flag used to mark the devices (belonging to
      PM domains) that should never be turned off, except for the system
      core (syscore) suspend/hibernation and resume stages, need not be
      accessed by the runtime PM core functions, because all of the devices
      it is set for need to be marked as "irq safe" anyway and are
      protected from being turned off by runtime PM by ensuring that their
      usage counters are always set.
      
      For this reason, make the syscore flag system-wide PM-specific
      and simplify the code used for manipulating it, because it need not
      acquire the device's power.lock any more.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      feb70af0