in iwlwifi: move setting up fw parameters

Meenakshi moved code up to configure the transport layer, but this
code read the sku before it was set (from the EEPROM). This killed
P2P.
Only the ucode_flags are needed to configure the transport layer, not
the sku which _must_ be set after the EEPROM is read.

We need to reconfigure the transport in case the EEPROM disabled PAN
support. This is not the nicest thing to do, but we have no choice.
Document that we are allowed to configure the transport several times
before start_fw, but not after.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The command queue number is required by the transport
layer, but it can be determined only by the op mode.
Move this parameter to the dvm op mode, and configure
the transport layer using an API.
Signed-off-by: NMeenakshi Venkataraman <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

I missed a couple of status bits in my refactoring changes.  This
fixes the ones I missed.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It's not needed anywhere but during init.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Continue splitting the status bits between transport and op_mode.
All but a few are separated.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Gather parameters required to configure the
transport layer before invoking the transport
configuration API.

Change-Id: I5b39da284af6d9b5432a08911b4e1173a4d7207d
Signed-off-by: NMeenakshi Venkataraman <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Introduce the iwl_trans_config struct which contains
state variables that only the op mode can determine,
but which the transport layer needs to know.
Signed-off-by: NMeenakshi Venkataraman <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There were a few missing occurences when we get PASSIVE_NO_RX
notification.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Otherwise we are not able to run more than one device per driver:

[   24.743045] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache iwl_dev_cmd
[   24.743051] Pid: 3165, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 3.3.0-rc2-wl+ #5
[   24.743054] Call Trace:
[   24.743066]  [<ffffffff811717d5>] kmem_cache_create+0x655/0x700
[   24.743101]  [<ffffffffa03b9f8b>] iwl_alive_notify+0x1cb/0x1f0 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743111]  [<ffffffffa03ba442>] iwl_load_ucode_wait_alive+0x1b2/0x220 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743142]  [<ffffffffa03ba893>] iwl_run_init_ucode+0x73/0x100 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743152]  [<ffffffffa03b8fa1>] __iwl_up+0x81/0x220 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743161]  [<ffffffffa03b91c0>] iwlagn_mac_start+0x80/0x190 [iwlwifi]
[   24.743188]  [<ffffffffa03307b3>] ieee80211_do_open+0x293/0x770 [mac80211]
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

wmb(), rmb() are not needed when writel(), readl() are used as
accessors for MMIO. We use them indirectly via iowrite32(),
ioread32().

What is needed mmiowb(), for synchronizing writes coming from
different CPUs on PCIe bridge (see in patch comments). This
fortunately is not needed on x86, where mmiowb() is just
defined as compiler barrier. As iwlwifi devices are most likely
not used on anything other than x86, this is not so important
fix.
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Before we write to the device registers always check if
iwl_grap_nic_access() was successful.

On the way change return type of grab_nic_access() to bool, and add
likely()/unlikely() statement.
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's no need to have operations for
these as they simply depend on whether
the device has built-in bluetooth, so
just duplicate the information already
there (whether bt_params is present or
not).
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The PASSIVE_NO_RX workaround currently crosses
through the op_mode and transport layers, which
is a bit odd. This also isn't necessary, if the
transport simply reports when queues are full
(or no longer full) the op_mode can keep track
of this state, and report to mac80211 only what
*it* thinks is appropriate. What is appropriate
can then be based on whether queues should be
stopped to wait for RX or not.

This significantly simplifies the transport API,
it no longer needs to expose anything to stop a
queue, nor to wake "any" queue, this can all be
handled in the upper layer completely.

Also simplify the handling to not be dependent
on the context, that makes little sense as the
queues are shared and both contexts have to be
on the same channel anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The function never uses the priv argument as it
only fills in the passed data, so remove the
argument.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Finally nothing needs to access priv
from shared any more, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The nic_config sets uCode dependent register
bits, so it must be virtual in the op_mode.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The transport doesn't really need to know as
we can enforce it in the command wrapper.
Move the ucode_owner variable into priv and
do all enforcing there.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The hardware config ht_params shouldn't be modified,
so copy the use_rts_for_aggregation parameter into
hw_params and use/modify it there.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The base_params shouldn't be writable, so keep
a copy of this in priv that can be modified.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This is a hardware parameter, so it shouldn't
be configurable by the user. Users can disable
aggregation (which is the only thing affected)
with 11n_disable.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

When the command queue is full, the transport
will return -ENOSPC, but the reaction to that
depends on the op_mode. Virtualize that, the
DVM op_mode checks for CT-kill and restarts
the hardware otherwise.

We may be able to get rid of this callback by
putting the behaviour check into the wrapper
but that needs more careful evaluation.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Tracing used the priv pointer as an identifier,
which has the problem that we don't have it in
all code, and also some people say no pointers
should be "leaked" to userspace.

Use the device name instead, it is more useful
anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's no need to copy shadow_reg_enable into
hw_params since it is a pure hardware parameter
that will never change, we can access it from
the config directly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Now the mutex no longer needs to be
shared, so move it into iwl_priv.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add wrappers to send commands from the DVM
op-mode (which essentially consists of the
current driver). This will allow us to move
specific sanity checks there.

Also, this removes iwl_trans_send_cmd_pdu()
since that can now be taken care of in the
DVM-specific wrapper.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This file was recently introduced, but then
directly abused -- it contained private data
that shouldn't have been used by anything
but the implementation of firmware requests
and some very core code. Now that it is no
longer accessed by any code but the code in
iwl-drv.c, we can dissolve it.

Also rename the iwl_nic struct to iwl_drv to
better reflect where and how it is used.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Through the driver, struct iwl_fw will
store the firmware. Split this out into
a separate file, iwl-fw.h, and make all
other code use it. To do this, also move
the log pointers into it, and remove the
knowledge of "nic" from everything.

Now the op_mode has a fw pointer, and
(unfortunately) for now the shared data
also needs to keep one for the transport
to access dump the error log -- I think
that will move later.

Since I wanted to constify the firmware
pointers, some more changes were needed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

uCode loading belongs to the op_mode, as it
is dependent on various things there and the
commands sent during it are specific to it.
Move the prototypes to iwl-agn.h to indicate
this. To make this possible, also move all
the calibration handling (which is op_mode
dependent after all).
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This doesn't belong into the op_mode, it has
to be in the drv stop flow instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This shouldn't be in the op_mode, as it
will later be switchable at runtime.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

With the new WoWLAN flow into the transport
there no longer is a need for this to be
shared, so move it into priv.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It's not really a good idea to write to the
global static configuration. Use the valid
TX/RX antenna information only from the HW
params struct except in the case where the
values from the config are used to override
the values from the EEPROM.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's no SKU override, we always just use
it from EEPROM. As such, we can remove it
from the config and use it in hw_param only.
Since iwl_eeprom_check_sku() really needs
to fill it in also rename that to
iwl_eeprom_init_hw_params().
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's no reason to set EXIT_PENDING when we
start removing the module, as mac80211 will
cleanly shut down the device in this case.
Additionally, there's no point in rejecting
commands to the device when we're cleaning up
as that only leads to unwanted errors from
mac80211 being printed, such as
  failed to remove key (...) from hardware (-16)
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Some data doesn't need protection, some of the
lock places are simply useless, and some data
can be protected with the mutex instead. Thus
the shared lock can be removed by making those
changes.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The statistics are currently only half-heartedly
locked against concurrent reading & modification
so introduce a lock to really protect them.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Now that the transport has its own locking,
there's no need to have the sta_lock in the
shared data. Also, it can be a BH lock as
it's not used from IRQ handlers.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's only one place using this function, so
move it where it's needed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

No one needs it any more
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

This is temporary, but at least we can now throw the bus away
and move the iwl_pci_{probe,remove} functions.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>