- 05 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
This reverts commit fa18484d. We need the restart trampoline back so that we can revert a related problematic patch 6b5c8045 ("arm: new way of handling ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK"). Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 22 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 25 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
The signal restarting code was placed on the user stack when OABI compatibility is enabled. Unfortunately, with an EABI NX executable, this results in an attempt to run code from the non-executable stack, which segfaults the application. Fix this by placing the code in the vectors page, along side the signal return code, and directing the application to that code. Reported-by: Nsaeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nsaeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 27 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hyok S. Choi 提交于
The high page vector (0xFFFF0000) does not supported in nommu mode. This patch allows the vectors to be 0x00000000 or the begining of DRAM in nommu mode. Signed-off-by: NHyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Patch from Nicolas Pitre The signal return path consists of user code provided by the kernel. Since a syscall is used, it has to be updated to work with EABI. Noticed by Daniel Jacobowitz. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Move the signal return code into the vector page instead of placing it on the user mode stack, which will allow us to avoid flushing the instruction cache on signals, as well as eventually allowing non-exec stack. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-